@billjings Cool! I think putting things like this into the type adds precision. Talk about the type, and you’ll have information about the why and the what.
@billjings Okay if the latter I’d say that they’re both just callbacks. Some languages make things clearer by forcing you to declare that a callback escapes scope or is a deferred thing or whatnot.
We got an air purifier during the wildfires so we could breathe easier indoors. It has a sensor and turns on as needed.
It turns on basically every time we cook.
Is cooking bad for us?
@billjings @griotspeak IMHO, common knowledge needs to extend beyond some horizon of temporality. If everyone knows that a one-off thing is going to happen on a date, then it is an incidental calendar event. It isn’t something persistent and pervasive, which is I think the operative concept here.
@billjings I think behavior at a rally like this is similar to how pseudo-spontaneous celebration occurs at a sporting event. Everyone is there for similar reasons and has an idea of what is supposed to occur. A collective conscience so to speak.
@billjings I actually don’t think this is a good example of common knowledge. Needing to see something in real time undermines the spirit at work in the idea of common knowledge.
@billjings “...Well, take a riot for example. You can't have an asynchronous riot, or a blindfolded riot. The whole reason a riot works is that everyone can see everyone else breaking the law together. That's common knowledge: the shared fact of the riot is what makes the riot possible.”