I don't presume to question that anyone's subjective experience of illness was unique TO THEM.
But when someone decides to publicly, and from a position of influence, call that illness 'covid' they are going beyond the personal and making a political statement that anyone is fully entitled to subject to analysis and question.
'Covid' was a massive state-sponsored LIE that brought suffering and death to millions of people.
It has no measurable objective reality.
Anyone with a large following who persistently denies this fact is doing a disservice to truth and to all those who suffered.
Since there is no evidence for a new and deadly coronavirus in 2020 there is no reason to chase after rumours of GoF - which have been largely planted in order to offer back door 'confirmation' that the pandemic was genuine.
It wasn't genuine. It was a lie. Which is the one thing that matters and the one thing the agenda-managers don't want you talking about
Good morning. Today, HUNDREDS of cardiologists across America, people who are supposed to be intelligent, will do the following 3 nonsensical things when they round on their hospitalized patients:
1. They will start loads of people over the age of 85 on a high dose STATIN medication. This despite a lack of any compelling evidence in this age group, and significant risk of side effects.
2. They will write in the chart that their patient should be on a “CARDIAC DIET”. This is basically a “low-fat” diet— which includes a huge amount of refined grains and processed foods (which are actually the main driver of cardiovascular disease nowadays).
3. They will obsess over limiting SALT intake and write this in their note. They will barely mention one word about SUGAR intake, which is BY FAR the number one reason for heart disease and underlying inflammation (excess carbohydrates/sugars drive, insulin resistance, and get converted into fatty acids via de novo lipogenesis).
None of the above happens because cardiologists are bad people. I’ve worked with many cardiologists over the years. This silliness happens because doctors basically regurgitate whatever their authority has been telling them for years. Literally like programmed robots. A complete lack of critical thinking, asking the right questions, and wanting to question dogma.
The above may sound harsh, but I assure you, it is 100% true. There is something very broken about medicine and the way that doctors in modern allopathic medicine just follow what is told to them.
Physicians should be independent thinkers and not blindly follow protocol.
The entirety of medicine is in need of a COMPLETE REBUILD from the bottom.
Because if it doesn’t, patients will never get the best care and right advice!
I am bewildered, and not very impressed, by the visceral, naked, irrational hatred spat out by some defenders of Jason Arday. If a Cambridge professor is accused of being an unqualified charlatan, the accusation might be racially motivated. On the other hand it might not, depending on the evidence. The correct question to ask is not, ”What is the colour of his skin” but “Is it in fact true that he is an unqualified charlatan?” Please examine the evidence before leaping to the assumption of racism.
As for the idea that journalists “piled in on him” and “hounded him to his death”, most attacks were against Cambridge University. Jason himself was widely regarded as an unfortunate victim of foolish promotion way beyond his ability to cope. In appointing him to a professorship for which he was manifestly unqualified – in ludicrously describing him as “the best in the world” – certain senior members of the university showed a level of patronising condescension towards black people that could fairly be described as racism, while at the same time making him tragically vulnerable to such attacks as came his way.
I asked Professor Angus Dalgleish (Professor of Oncology at St. George's University of London and one of the world's leading cancer immunologists) whether he believed the COVID vaccine was creating turbo cancers. He said yes, and that after reviewing over 400 publications on the subject the mechanisms are so numerous it's surprising there aren't more cases than we're already seeing.
He walked me through several of them. The vaccine suppresses T-cell response and switches the antibody system into a tolerant state, essentially converting the body into a condition similar to transplant readiness, where it won't reject a foreign organ and won't reject a cancer. It can integrate into the genome next to oncogenes. The Pfizer vaccine contains SV40, a known oncogene. It interferes with dozens of metabolic and signaling pathways that, when overstimulated, drive cancer and don't switch off.
The mechanism that concerns him most is the vaccine's ability to bind and silence tumor suppressor genes like p53 and BRCA. If someone already carries a natural mutation in one of those genes, their cancer arrives 20 or 30 years earlier than it otherwise would have. Interfere with more than two or three of these pathways simultaneously and you pull it forward even further, and when the cancer does arrive, the brakes are gone.
In nearly 40 years he said he's never seen anything like the presentations he's seeing now.
He said we should ban all mRNA vaccines, because they aren't vaccines, they're gene therapies, and giving them to children can interfere with their genome for the rest of their lives. He called allowing these products to go into young people, when we knew none of them were at risk of dying, criminal medical negligence and the crime of the century.
Why is Britain about to mandate the addition of a licensed medicine with the known side-effect of increasing miscarriages into the nation's flour? Folic acid is coming and the public are oblivious, says Dr Clare Craig.
https://t.co/CduDPLxZiU
Do you have UNDIAGNOSED B12 deficiency?
How would you know?
6% of vegans do
20% of those over 60 years old do
For these people too much folic acid is dangerous.
This is from the pernicious anaemia society's instagram.
Sign petition 👇
The unvaccinated were the most hated people on Earth. They lost their jobs. Friends and families disowned them. They were reported and arrested. Society treated them like lepers…and 7 years later…it turns out that they were right about everything…
Keep it simples folks.
Im not saying blood tests and investigations are never required, but more often than not, they aren't necessary.
Tests dont make you better.
They are useful in diagnosis, monitoring disease (progression), and in some cases treatment efficacy.
But again, let me repeat, tests and investigations do not make you better.
My prospective client didn't want to discuss how to deal with his condition.
All he was focused on were the tests.
This is why I cancelled the consultation. And he agreed I did the right thing when I explained the reasoning.
It's a shame he didn’t see the benefit in picking my brains. Regarding managing his condition, it would have been money far better spent.
But over the years, I've realised you can't help people who don't want to be helped.
Also, managing expectations is hugely important.
My colleagues often remarked how lucky I was to have great patients.
I told them it wasn't luck.
I chose who I worked with.....