@luke_winkie Nah, you are a faggot. Young Men were just protesting a party that said it was for them and backstabbed us at every turn.
I disagree with the strategy, but that's what happened.
@Jorge_Joe200@gruffdonaar@VenomFrenchPunk So? The Hyrule Historia timeline was not made by the developers, only one developer is listed as having worked on it, that being Aonuma who in an interview outright stated that he didn't work on it
Hyrule Historia is fan fiction, and fans using a previous timeline is no surpise.
@gonzatho000@TakVonTenebrae@ZeldaZealot Except they didn't make it, the devs never once touched the timeline. Hyrule Historia was made by people completely separate from the dev team, with only Aonuma being credited from the dev team, and Aonuma on interview outright said he didn't work on HH.
@Trynopoliss@Trevor_ShowALK@MightyGazelle1 Given that Hyrule's religion originally was just Christianity, that was then used as a basis to craft the new mythos for the games that we see today. Hylia probably does forbid it.
@Jorge_Joe200@gruffdonaar@VenomFrenchPunk Hyrule Historia created the timeline, this is an entirely different timeline and you equate it to the current modern timeline. That is dishonest.
@elzorrorebelde@Italian347 If you just want to play it with modding, higher FPS, and customization. Ship of Harkinian is based on the decompilation of OOT and is a PC port. You might try it.
@revenant_MMXX Jolyne was never meant to endure the stuff she had to, that was never what should have happened and the ending displays that perfectly. Her sacrifice for Emporio is what ultimately lets him win, and what frees her (and everyone else) from this fate that they never should have.
@revenant_MMXX :SPOILER WARNING FOR PART 6:
This is part of why I like her as a protagonist and why I think her ultimately losing her fight is great. Jolyne was never going to be able to win, she did the best she could but ultimately was Jotaro's weakness.
That's part of why the ending works.
@JohnMcReadyMBB@Italian347@Tulavera92 It kept the game sure, but it loses the fantastic designs of Oblivion's monster roster. Just go look up a comparison, or the omnipresent censorship in the game.
Still a good game (just as the OOT remake is), but under the original in quality.
@RoytaMustDie You have a Felix picture and therefore are not permitted to be retarded, ergo you would not be so stupid as to think "hardware limitations" somehow prevent an object from being static rather than dynamic.
@SilverHawk1997@CounterTyrannyX@ChristianHeiens however a foreign agent in his camp convinced him against taking such a risky action (when we now know, that it would have been a relatively safe operation where Mao would be present and likely captured).
The communist subversion ultimately set the world in its current state.
@SilverHawk1997@CounterTyrannyX@ChristianHeiens Funnily enough China would never have been a problem had it not been for Communist infiltration of the USA and Chiang kai-shek's inner circle.
For instance at one point during the Chinese civil war Chiang kai-shek had an opportunity to push the communist and capture Mao
@BulbminThe3rd@OctorokR semantic debate and instead go with the qualitative data and point. Because to argue semantics is to play someone else's game, and that is a game you cannot win.
Call it whatever you want, genetics greatly influence behavior, intelligence, appearance, and physical capabilities.
@BulbminThe3rd@OctorokR Sure maybe by a strict definition, but "bioessentialism" today includes all non-blank slate viewpoints. That's why many groups of people attack the concept of "evil races" in fantasy, they do so on the grounds of "bioessentialism" being wrong.
I just don't bother with the
@DiscordingTales@Zelda_Updates "or even WW" WW is literally only talked about because of YouTubers. TP stands up significantly better in terms of artstyle.
@UnburgerMod Didn't even know you were an Alicesoft fan (or had a twitter for that matter). With you being a fan I can rest easy if Rance X is butchered lol.
@Mofumofu_Ship2@UnburgerMod "it's fallacious when someone's authority is being used as a substitute for adequate evidence or reasoning", in otherwords you are saying it is fallacious at all times and don't realize it.
Unless you are saying that "adequate evidence or reasoning" suddenly become invalid when