@GregBaseman@Alokkumarzz Good point and they are. These prompts are especially useful for anyone without the experience to write the prompt in the first place.
Reading the prompt helps the user, in my opinion. It reveals gaps, terms, practices, and policy to the user.
Straightforward cross-platform user identification by Grok and Cursor rife with possibilities for abuse? Too bad it doesn’t appear to implement the more useful step of authenticating user accounts. https://t.co/W17tjdwePB
“Acquit if the law is unjust/ly applied” is exactly against the law. In a trial, the jury may only try questions of fact not law. A judge applies the law and approves jury instructions that are correct and agreeable/negotiated by opposing sides.
Dismantle DCFS 🚨
Jurors: Acquit if the law is unjust/ly applied ⚖️
"Underthrow" the government ��
Unrig elections by using proportional RCV & sortition. 🗳️
Learn more at https://t.co/qgObtKEnEk
“I was pulled away and surrounded by security. I was told not to move for five minutes.. It’s very concerning to go to that extent to shut down a very simple question about January 6th”
@batemanjason I’m a few episodes into the #smartless documentary, & even while I laugh & laugh, I think, if only he [ahem, you] took an alpha-galactosidase enzyme pill (#beano), L. reuteri, & Saccharomyces Boulardii 😭, he could relax without the gax. (Gas-X 🤷♂️ it had to rhyme)
@mikiebarb I love your work but it’s naive to think local news is worth paying for everywhere. Maybe it’s time for @nytimes to partner with prospective reporters, or highlight their freelanced work, in underserved areas so we can deliver reliable local coverage.
@AlexAndBooks_@goodreads Change the logo and UI. It’s poor design elements simultaneously make me sleepy and wonder whether Goodreads thinks books are, after all, just about the cover.
@sltrib Your premise is wrong so publicizing this is irresponsible. “The crowd is untruth.” Every person is an individual. Your false dichotomy is -unnecessary- disinformation.
@petestrzok@NicolleDWallace Thank you, that’s right. “A lawyer shall not permit a person who recommends, employs, or pays the lawyer to render legal services for another to direct or regulate the lawyer's professional judgment in rendering such legal services.” MRPC 5.4(c) (and see, MPRC 1.8(14))