The PM's decision to double the maximum penalty for social media giants is welcome, but consider the maths. For platforms turning over up to $290 billion a year, $99 million is a rounding error: the cost of doing business, not a deterrent. Canada's Safe Social Media Act, pegs penalties to a share of global revenue, up to 3%, or 5% for the most serious breaches. That is a fine a multinational actually feels. A flat $99 million is not.
Check out my latest article: Put the phone down and look up: what Spielberg's new film taught me — and what i can teach our kids https://t.co/ZnfNhb4SmM via @LinkedIn
Canada is moving to financially penalise social media companies that fail to protect children. Australia legislated an under-16 ban. Good. But legislation without real penalties for non-compliance is just a strongly worded letter. When the cost of ignoring the rules is lower than the cost of following them, companies ignore the rules. That's not cynicism, that's basic economics. We fine food companies for misleading labels. We prosecute manufacturers for unsafe products. The idea that platforms algorithmically serving harmful content to children should face lighter consequences is absurd. The Federal Government should look at Canada's model and adopt it. Our kids deserve at least that much.
@TheCybercop1@eSafetyOffice@Joe_Hildebrand #DigitalWellbeing #Australia #Parenting
@AnikaWells@AlboMP The @eSafetyOffice has always been very small and lean given its remit. The UK's OFCOM had double the Esafety commissions staff in 2023 before the powers around the Online safety act had even been enlivened. Their annual budget is now triple the Esafety commission and they do not have complaints and investigations schemes. Time to fund our Esafety commission properly. @TheCybercop1@3AWNeilMitchell@Joe_Hildebrand
Congratulations @tim_cook on your call with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Open dialogue between government and technology leaders is essential as we work to create a safer, healthier and more innovative digital future for young Australians. @Joe_Hildebrand@3AWNeilMitchell@TheCybercop1@eSafetyOffice
Is the Albanese Government's gambling crackdown protecting children — or protecting industry? Why Canberra’s Gambling “Reforms” Are a Capitulation — and What We Must Do About It https://t.co/HRjUqzlTol @3AWNeilMitchell@TimCostello@DavidPocock@Mon4Kooyong
So, Michael Jackson's movie has recorded the highest earnings for a musical in Australian cinema history, (HS 'Beat it, rivals: MJ back to No 1' 28/6). It is also one of the most morally evasive films to come out of Hollywood in years. It is technically stunning, emotionally manipulative, and built on a lie of omission so large you could moonwalk through it. This film is not just weak on its subject. It is deliberately constructed to make audiences feel before they can think. Nostalgia hits first. Sympathy follows. By the time any difficult question surfaces, the audience has been pre-loaded with enough emotion to dismiss it as betrayal. The harder questions have been silenced. What a disgrace. @3AWNeilMitchell@TheCybercop1
Melbourne Airport shouldn’t get a safe, forgettable name. Airport names signal identity. If we want substance over spectacle, choose Sir John Monash a visionary leader, engineer, and nation-builder. That’s the Melbourne we should show the world. @RossAndRussel