@grabert_de @moreno_vote13 Você fala como se ela fosse a única ou uma das poucas assassinadas políticas do país... E não que o Brasil é o campeão de assassinatos políticos, especialmente contra indígenas, mulheres, ambientalistas e negros/pretos.
@jacinto1rego@jonesmanoel_PE Ri e julga porque, como ao menos reconhece, nem sabe do que tá falando. Apreciar o sentido de algo requer um mínimo de conhecimento e de estudo. Você não tem nem um, nem o outro.
@PodcastF1Brasil @jonesmanoel_PE Vai estudar, a começar pelo que é ideologia, para parar de falar merda e passar vergonha.
Ó, te ajudo a começar: https://t.co/bmKLShdTSw
@ShrekKeplr The claim of the Science article stands. Even with said correction. And you are being evasive instead of addressing it.
Which further proves the point that the best, easiest single biggest thing ANYONE can do is to stop demanding climate catastrophes though animal consumption.
@ShrekKeplr It's closer to 60% than half, if your sourceless claim is valid. What's up with showing wholly?
Nevertheless your sentence is immaterial since it attempts a very emotional "poison the well" with sprinkles of "attacking the messenger" ("your virtue") fallacies, knit together.Weak
@waiterich (...), food prices get to expensive fast. So this idealization, although mathematically sound, doesn't pass the scrutiny of practical material reality.
And I said it myself that eliminating both variables are desired. They are just no on the same scale or plane for prioritization
@waiterich Sure, but this "if distance is very far" is a purely theoretical proposition. In reality distances can get very big, because the material reality of the world being finite and air range being limited (both for having low[er] absolute carrying capacity and for the cost of fuel),