De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

How do you currently track contamination events?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

Hi, I think I need some advice here,
How do you currently track contamination events?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@SpikeSpiegle007 Even more in special occasions🙄

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@SpikeSpiegle007 Of course, I spend much more in flowers or treats anyways for the same purpose

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@francomendezok Me refiero a que con el tráfico real que estás teniendo ahora, ¿ya hay algo que pensabas construir pero que el mensaje/landing te está diciendo “no vale la pena”?
A mí me pasa que validar así no solo confirma qué hacer, sino qué descartar antes de perder tiempo.

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@ammandotdev @theawesomedev_ Yeah It might be, but I think at the end we all need some validation for the market. Otherwise you risk building something only you deemed as truly unique

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@abrahamrivv Lanzar antes de perfecto siempre aclara la cabeza.

¿Qué feedback te gustaría validar primero en esta v1?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@paulocagi Este ritmo es el bueno, el hablar, ajustar, repetir.

¿Qué fue lo primero que cambiaste después de las encuestas?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@danclachar Totalmente. Validar duele menos que construir mal.

¿Qué error ves más seguido cuando la gente “valida” pero igual se equivoca?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@euw3ll Dilema clássico validação rápida versus boa escalabilidade

O que você aprendeu no Telegram mudou a forma como você aplicaria esse conhecimento na web?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@miguel_sanzkf Brutal esto. Validar en casa es señal purísima.

¿Hubo algo que pensabas que funcionaría y no cambió nada en ellas?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@PauBrown Esto es justo lo difícil de validar: soltar ideas preconcebidas.

¿Qué hipótesis fue la que más te sorprendió al descartarla?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@LanceKiddington This timeline feels realistic.

I believe that the 10-minute validation works best when it’s public + low risk.
Ask one sharp question, then iterate from replies.
What question would you start with?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@MehulFanawala Even small revenue changes behaviour, congrats on that.

I’ve noticed founders iterate way faster once they share progress publicly.

Are you planning to tweak the offer based on feedback?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@ThornhillMatt This hits.

People who actually validate seem to share ideas before they feel ready.
Quick test, adjust, repeat.

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@TheDomid @HeyYoGB This is underrated advice.
Validating the niche publicly keeps it reversible and fast.
I’ve seen people repost refinements instead of starting over.

Do you usually validate in threads or DMs?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@theawesomedev_ @ammandotdev I’ve noticed POCs work best when people share them early and tweak from feedback instead of going dark.

Are you planning to validate any POC publicly?

[De Oliveira Barrancos Alejandro José @Me585578]

@ginacostag_ This framework is solid.
One thing I’d add: make each test disposable.
Share, learn, iterate and no attachment.

Which step usually gives you the strongest signal?