🏴‍☠️Harold Dionne

Président de Mégalithe inc. Intéressé par la politique, la techno, la science. Retweet la plupart du temps les sujets qui m'accroche.

[Lewis Miles @Maga4liberty]

Why does the media give nonstop coverage to a 16-year-old reading from a script, but completely ignore a real climatologist with over 140 scientific papers who calls climate change a hoax? This is media manipulation. 😡🤡
#MediaBias

[TR6Guy @tr6_guy]

So 🇨🇦 you think you did the right thing electing a Central Banker in Mark Carney.

You fell right into the trap.

Watch this video that explains the system we are trapped into FOREVER.

[Johnny Midnight ⚡️ @its_The_Dr]

Interesting, Nicotine is actually very Beneficial for people.

[Joe Tippens @JoeTippen]

CHEMO HAS A 97% FAILURE RATE. Dr. Peter Glidden:

"Chemotherapeutic drugs are the only classification of drugs where the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut. So if your doctor prescribes chemo for you, here's how it goes. The doctor buys it from the pharmaceutical company for $5,000; he sells it to the patient for $12,000; insurance pays $9,000, and the doc pockets $4,000. The only reason chemotherapy is used is because doctors make money from it, period. It doesn't work 97% of the time."

[Joe Tippens @JoeTippen]

IVERMECTIN AND FENBENDAZOL END CANCER
🎯CONFIRMED: Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher states that complete remissions of stage IV cancers using antiparasitic drugs are already documented in peer-reviewed scientific literature.

According to him, hundreds of studies show that ivermectin and fenbendazole activate more than 12 different anticancer mechanisms and act against more than a dozen types of cancer.

Among the most impactful works cited by Hulscher is a case report published in Case Reports in Oncology.

There, three patients with metastatic stage IV cancer are described who achieved complete remission documented by imaging and tumor markers:

📌An 83-year-old woman with breast cancer that had metastasized to the liver, lungs, and bones. After treatment, the PET scan showed complete remission, and she has shown no recurrence in nearly three years.

📌A 75-year-old man with metastatic bone prostate cancer. His PSA dropped to undetectable levels, and the metastases disappeared completely.

📌A 63-year-old man with highly advanced BRAFV600+ melanoma. His circulating tumor DNA went from 123 to 0 in less than two months, with confirmed remission.

Additionally, a recent systematic review analyzed 26 studies with 36 real patients treated with ivermectin. No serious adverse effects were reported, and clinical improvements were observed even in cases of leukemias and lymphomas, many of them while continuing to receive conventional chemotherapy.

Alternative scientists explain that these drugs attack cancer in multiple ways: they destabilize microtubules, induce programmed apoptosis, block the mTOR pathway, cut off the glucose supply to tumor cells, inhibit the formation of new blood vessels, and eliminate cancer stem cells.

All this with medications that cost pennies and have been used in humans and animals for decades.

While conventional medicine invests billions in high-cost therapies, on social media thousands of patients are already sharing personal testimonials: tumors that shrink or disappear, markers that normalize, and surgeries that end up being canceled.

The question sweeping the world is whether this represents the greatest medical suppression in history or the most important discovery of the 21st century. The dissenting scientific community demands controlled clinical trials with urgency. For many terminal cancer patients, time has simply run out.

What do you think? Give it an RT and share this information before it disappears, as it could save many lives. Your friends or family fighting cancer need to read this today.

FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace:

"[Carbon dioxide] is the most important nutrient for all life on Earth, and without it this would be a dead planet."

"I am firmly of the belief that the future will show that this whole hysteria over climate change was a complete fabrication."

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Je crois qu'on ne mesure pas ce qu'Elon Musk est en train de construire avec X.

Tous les médias de l'histoire ont été couplés à une culture, une langue, une bulle géographique. Le Monde parle aux Français. Le NYT parle aux Américains. NHK parle aux Japonais. Chaque média filtre le réel à travers le prisme de sa culture locale.

X est en train de devenir le premier média de l'humanité. Pas d'un pays. De l'espèce.

Je le vis en temps réel. Mes posts en français se font RT par des Japonais, répondre par des Brésiliens, citer par des Américains. Des conversations qui n'auraient jamais existé il y a 5 ans. Un libertarien français qui débat avec un ingénieur de Tokyo et un entrepreneur de Sao Paulo sous le même tweet. Pas traduit par un éditeur. Traduit instantanément par l'IA, en un clic.

Les bulles de filtre culturelles sont en train d'exploser.

Et je pense qu'on sous-estime massivement les effets composés de ça.

Quand une idée peut traverser un océan en 3 secondes, quand un argument sourcé posté à Paris peut être vérifié par un économiste à Singapour et amplifié par un développeur à Austin dans la même heure, le coût de propagation d'une bonne idée tend vers zéro.

Et c'est catastrophique pour un type d'acteur très précis : les médias qui ont construit leur business model sur le monopole de l'information locale. Ceux qui pouvaient raconter n'importe quoi sur "ce qui se passe ailleurs" parce que personne ne pouvait vérifier.

Quand un journaliste français écrit que "le modèle américain ne marche pas", maintenant il y a 50 Américains dans les réponses avec des sources. Quand un éditorialiste dit que "le Danemark prouve que le socialisme fonctionne", il y a un Danois qui explique que le Danemark est 10e en liberté économique mondiale.

Le fact-checking n'est plus un département. C'est un effet réseau.

Les médias honnêtes n'ont rien à craindre de ça. Les médias qui vendaient une narration protégée par l'ignorance géographique de leur audience vont avoir un problème existentiel.

Parce qu'on ne peut plus mentir à l'échelle locale quand le monde entier regarde.

[Joe Rogan Podcast News @joeroganhq]

Ted Nugent to Joe Rogan: "If you really want to k*ll the most things, be a vegan."

[Johnny Midnight ⚡️ @its_The_Dr]

George Carlin Roasts the liberal Stupidity!

[Jasper Truth 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 @Jasper_Truth]

DID YOU GROW UP IN THE 70S? IT IS TRUE!

[🏴‍☠️Harold Dionne @Megalithe]

That's what I've been doing since 2018, all my health problems have disappeared, I feel like I'm 35 years old and I'm 56.

What Happens to Testosterone When Men Use Intermittent Fasting Long Term... https://t.co/7UArQmw1nw via @YouTube

[GorillaScience @WatchGorillaSci]

The Big Climate Lie - exposed. Dr Willie Soon looks at the science. @WillieSoon8 @Martin_Durkin @TomANelson @CuriosityonX

[NancyH @NancyH_60]

The perfect description of GenX - this is absolutely hilarious 🤣

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

The truth about "renewable" energy, electric vehicles and petroleum found its way into an episode of Landman. 🔥

[🏴‍☠️Harold Dionne @Megalithe]

How the times have truly changed https://t.co/AcTYdJVUtN via @YouTube

[John Ziegler @Zigmanfreud]

If you are longing for a simpler time that is now gone forever, this video will likely hit HARD…
🥲

[🏴‍☠️Harold Dionne @Megalithe]

The Greeks Built Perfect Physiques Without Eating — Here’s Their Secret https://t.co/WBdNNSxXOy via @YouTube

[Joe Rogan Podcast News @joeroganhq]

Do you guys fast?

[X Freeze @XFreeze]

Elon Musk: You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech

The side that is restricting freedom of speech you know, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world

They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That’s one of the signs that they’re the bad guys

In fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom

Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed