I'm not supposed to say this, but screw it. I’m not shutting up about it @YouTube
I played by every rule. Won a legal case (Case #3007912819) against YouTube 5 months ago. Did everything right.
But what's happening now? Honestly insulting.
Let's talk about STANDARDS
YouTube's STANDARDS for terminating a creator's channel:
❌ Standard of evidence: NONE
❌ Standard of decision-making: AI moderation
❌ Standard of explanation: Copy/paste policy header and vague policy link
❌ Standard of documentation: ZERO (creators see nothing)
❌ Standard for appeal review: Automated rejection in minutes
❌ Legal Standard: Violating EU Digital Services Act (Article 17(1)(e) and (4) of the DSA) by failing to provide evidence and reasons for termination.
❌ Standard for creator support: Automated responses with no clear answers. If you somehow reach a human, you can get banned for 30 days just for asking fair questions.
My STANDARDS for defending my channel and my rights as a creator for the last 13 months:
✅ Legal Standard: Won a legal case and followed the DSA to the letter
✅ Standard of documentation: Complete documentation of every detail and every step, showing editing timelines, scripts, voiceovers, research, sources, and even the channels that were stealing my scripts, literally everything
✅ Standard of evidence: Legal-grade evidence, a legal decision showing termination was wrong and my content is legit
✅ Standard of explanation: Justified every step in detail
✅ Standard of review: Endured a 6-month independent legal process while patiently defending my rights
✅ Standard of content: YouTube's own employee made a rare human review of my channel in June 2024 and found no violations, confirming I follow the community guidelines (months before termination happened)
➡️My STANDARDS: As high as they can go for one small creator.
➡️YouTube's STANDARDS: please drop in the comments how YOU would describe these standards. (I'd rather not share the word I have in mind...)
And here's the crazy part:
❗️I had to hold myself to impossibly high standards just to defend myself.
❗️I provided evidence YouTube never provided.
❗️I spent more than a year proving wrong what their AI decided in seconds.
❗️I won a legal case because that was the only way to fight back for me.
And YouTube??? YouTube still can't meet the basic standard of following a legal decision or showing what I violated.
YouTube operates with zero STANDARDS for itself.
But the system forces creators to meet impossible STANDARDS just to survive.
How is that fair to anyone?
I stood up for my channel with legal facts and professional rigor.
YouTube is responding with silence, ignorance, and automated replies/emails.
I have done my part. I proved my innocence.
@TeamYouTube Now please do your part. Please reinstate the channel.
🆘 I need your help: RT this and like
Please make them listen, so they can't pretend that nothing happened. It's time for answers!
#YouTubeAIWrongedCreators @YouTubeCreators@YouTubeInsider
Mreka punya "main core" atau "backbone" menu yg stabil
Pricing mereka juga tepat, dan banyak review customer yg memuji "kualitas" produk
Ingat: mayoritas warga kita suka
1. Pedes
2. Terjangkau
3. Menu banyak