“Inclusion” is a word I’m genuinely beginning to despise, it is used as a weapon to shut down legitimate boundaries. Exclusions exist for a reason
We exclude adults from children’s spaces. Drunk people from driving. Spectators from the field of play. Unqualified people from certain professions. And men from women’s single-sex spaces.
A boundary is not hatred. Privacy, dignity, safety and fairness depend on exclusion.
notice how ‘girls mature faster’ is never stated as a reason why girls should be given more positions of power and authority? It only works to hold girls to greater accountability than boys and to justify men’s attraction to them.
If a 13-year-old girl is “old enough to know what she was doing,” then the 25-year-old man who touched her is old enough to rot in prison. Your “boys will be boys” defense is just pedophile cosplay.
Returning your shopping cart might be one of the simplest tests of whether someone has consideration for other people.
Nobody's going to arrest you if you leave it in the middle of the parking lot. There's no reward for putting it back either.
You either take 30 seconds and do it because it's the decent thing to do, or you make it somebody else's problem.
It really is that simple. If you can't be bothered with a shopping cart, I don't trust you with bigger responsibilities either.
The patriarchy:
Male primogeniture protected in the GRA
Campaigns exclusively to protect men over women (protect the dolls/elect the dolls)
Drag Queens - mocking women for fun in the most demeaning and sexist way imaginable
Media surrounding protecting Women’s rights geared towards listening to men’s feelings about it
Males in female sports
Reframing women’s boundaries as ‘hate’, framing women challenging the patriarchy as ‘hateful’
Mostly profiling women who pretend to be men when they’re pregnant.
Ignoring decades of threatening behaviour towards women by men who cross dress
Changing women’s language to include males, thus removing the power for women to advocate for sex equality.
10 years ago we all understood that men with a crossdressing paraphilia have an even higher propensity to commit sexual crimes than other men.
There has been a very successful campaign to make us forget.
I know everybody’s still laughing at the Jason Arday story and wondering how on earth anyone could believe such absolute wild madness.
Well, can I just throw one word into the conversation?
Trans.
Jason Arday is a traditional con artist.
The same people who kissed his arse and believed he’d walked on the moon while helping deliver Queen Victoria's babies are the same people who believe Bob the Builder over there is a woman if he puts a dress on and says the magic words.
These two things are related.
The fact that people can look at Arday and recognise that they’ve been conned, but somehow can’t understand that men who claim to be women can also be con artists, is something I will never quite understand.
It’s the same inability to question the story they’re being sold. They become so invested in believing the narrative that they stop looking at what is actually in front of them.
So can we please have that conversation?
And can the brain-dead people who were fooled by Arday wake up and realise that if they were capable of being fooled that easily once, maybe just maybe they should start questioning some of the other things they’ve been told to believe?
Because the Arday story really should be a wake-up call.
You were fooled.
Now ask yourself why.
I am not stupid enough to believe that a man impersonating a woman by wearing women's clothes, seeking access to female-only spaces, occupational requirements and risk asessement, is doing it for reasons other than sexually deviant ones. Are you stupid enough to believe it?
A great way to see Van Gogh's "Starry Night" is to stare at the center of the spiral for 20 seconds and then look at the painting.
Why Starry Night was so famous: https://t.co/P8BvRGohvu
Your chance of being bitten by a poisonous snake is one in 70,000.
A woman’s chances of being attacked by a man are 1 in 3.
A fear of snakes is seen as understandable, but women are constantly told that our fear of men is “exaggerated.”
Recognising men, calling them men, and treating them as men is serious contempt and ridicule in Australia.
Public humiliation and financial ruination is the punishment.
But fantasising about having sex with Kylie M, telling everybody about your sex life with your wife, and joking about the 'melons' of the Japanese PM live on air from the official Prime Ministerial residence is fine though, isn't it @AlboMP.
Because women don't matter. We're just a sexual fantasy. Or a regular root. Or a sexist punchline.
Our PM is a sexist pig who reduces women to sexual chattel from the residence we provide him.
He's reduced our fight to restore our rights to a 'cultural issue'.
Subjecting women to public humiliation and financial penury for knowing what a man isn't a 'cultural issue' we shouldn't be experiencing in 2026.
Cultural issues don't end up in the High Court.
This is a political and legal war on women waged by the Prime Minister's Office.
This tree was alive before London and England even existed
Perhaps a Roman soldier out of their new town of Londinium set eyes on it
The oldest tree in London +2000 years - The Totteridge Yew 🌲
Ordered to pay $95000 for calling a man, a man. And now another man is suing a pole dancing studio owner for $30000 for being denied membership. Clown world.
Radio silence from the libfems who want to constantly scream about male violence against women, but can't even define what a woman is.
You cannot protect what you can't define.
I stand with these two brave women.