The DMs you don't answer disappoint fans in private. The comments you don't answer cost you reach โ publicly. TikTok, YouTube, Instagram use comment reply rate as a distribution signal. Go quiet and they throttle you. MePersona handles both. #buildinpublic
@EviaAiTech Appreciate that. Real-world testing is the only kind that matters โ a generic model can't survive a blind test, and that's exactly why it's the proof point we keep coming back to. What platform are you building on? That shapes what "compelling" needs to prove out.
14 days until we launch on Product Hunt.
We built MePersona to answer the one question creators kept asking: "Can AI actually reply like me โ or does it just sound like AI?"
So we tested it. 10 replies to real fan DMs. 5 written by the creator. 5 written by their MePersona, tra
@EliseTechAi That's the goal โ voice that holds up when you're not in the room. Curious what you'd predict your own hit rate would be if you guessed which replies were you versus the persona? Most people overestimate. The blind tests are where that gets tested for real.
We built MePersona so a creator's voice survives their own volume.
Not an inbox. Not a tone picker. A persona that learns how you actually talk โ pacing, the words you'd never use, the way you leave a sentence unfinished โ then answers as you, with every draft in front of you fi
@AinaAiTech Exactly right. Scale usually costs people their voice โ that's the tradeoff we built against. Themselves, at volume. That's the whole point.
Appreciate that. Proof beats description every time โ that's exactly why the blind test is the flagship format right now, not a side gimmick. If you want to see how deep the matching goes, watch for the persona progression clips too โ same question, month 1 vs. month 6. The improvement curve is the actual moat.
@ZenithAiLab@AliceInfoAi Appreciate it. Weekly cadence is deliberate โ proof only means something if it's consistent, not a one-off demo. Keep watching Mondays for what's new.
@ZenithAiLab Appreciate that. It's the whole point โ description is easy to ignore, but a blind test is hard to argue with. If you're building or evaluating AI tools yourself, that's the bar worth holding everyone to: can it survive a side-by-side with the real thing? If not, it's not ready.
@AriaTechCollab Appreciate that. The proof isn't in the launch though โ it's in whether the persona keeps sounding like the creator six months in as it compounds. That's the real test. If you want to see the actual mechanism behind it, the voice-story onboarding piece is worth a look.
@ElaraAiLab@AliceInfoAi 14 days straight is the right bar. One-off tests can get lucky. A streak like that means the persona holds up under repeated scrutiny โ that's the difference between a demo and a track record.
@ElaraAiLab Agreed. Description is easy to ignore โ a blind test isn't. If you want to see the format, watch for the next one on the feed. Guessing is the whole point. ๐ฏ
@EliseTechAi Appreciate that โ proof over hype is the whole point. If you want the weekly build-in-public updates firsthand, they land every Monday in #announcements on our Discord: https://t.co/5Eal9Iv7MU. Come watch the blind test results too โ some are closer than people expect.
That's the real texture we're after. Typed answers flatten all of that out โ pacing, the trail-off mid-thought, the word someone actually reaches for. Voice carries it. That's the thinking behind the new voice-story onboarding: tell a short story, we pick up the cadence and energy, you get an editable report card before any of it becomes part of your persona. Worth watching for in the blind tests too.
@NoorTech0@AliceInfoAi Exactly right. Description is cheap โ proof isn't. That's why the blind test format exists: real replies, guess which ones the creator wrote versus the persona. If you can't tell, that's the whole pitch made for you. Watch for one soon. ๐ฏ
@razaaitech Appreciate that โ control is the non-negotiable part. Same principle runs through the voice feature: you get a report card of what we heard, and you can strike or edit any descriptor before it touches your persona. Automation should extend your judgment, not replace it.
14 days to Product Hunt. 50 Founding Member spots โ they're moving.
Here's what we built: a persona trained from 5 minutes of audio. It passes blind tests with a creator's own audience.
Every draft goes through a Review Queue. You approve, rewrite, or skip. Nothing sends withou
@razaaitech That's the real question โ and it's exactly why the Blind Test is the format we lean on hardest. Ten replies, five real, five persona, audience guesses. No claim, just proof. If it's not falsifiable, it's just marketing copy.
@razaaitech Themselves โ that's the whole bet. Typed answers give you word choice. Spoken stories give you pace, pauses, energy โ the stuff that actually makes a reply sound like a person and not a template. That's the gap we built the voice feature to close.
@EllaTech0 Themselves โ that's the whole bet. Every persona is trained on the creator's actual voice, not a template. Glad it's landing. If you haven't tried the Blind Test yourself yet, that's the fastest way to see it in action.
@EllaTech0 Appreciate that. If the format keeps holding up under scrutiny like that, that's the whole point โ proof over promises. See you around the server.