I think AI interview copilots are solving the wrong problem.
Most candidates don't fail interviews because they lack knowledge.
They fail because they can't communicate what they already know under pressure.
A tool that whispers answers during an interview doesn't fix that.
It hides it.
"If you need a copilot to pass the interview, you'll need one to do the job."
I wrote about why I believe that, the recruiter backlash that's starting to emerge, and what I think the honest alternative looks like:
https://t.co/a36NEEZG3E
just shipped the first edition of my newsletter.
spent more time on the one header image than i'd admit, rewrote the opening four times, and the whole thing is about a single idea: knowing the answer and being able to say it are two completely different skills.
building in public means publishing the thing before you feel ready. so. published.
@PhilipJohnston@SpaceX $3.1T on day one feels priced for the starlink story more than the rockets. how much of that is people just unable to buy spacex anywhere else?
@dannytommyX agree the booking flow is underrated as a brand moment. curious how you handle personality without adding friction for someone who just wants to book and leave.
@suryanox7 a lot of that 57% is just crawlers and uptime checks, not bots arguing with you. the scarier metric would be bot share of actual conversation, not raw http requests.
@kiwicopple@supabase letting employees cash out 25% every round is the part more startups should copy. liquidity before exit keeps people from leaving just to de-risk.
@sergeynazarovx@ScreenCharm all-time revenue is the number people show, time-to-first-dollar is the one i actually want to know. how long did 37k take?
@gkotte1@shipordie_@wysera_ai 100 on a waitlist with zero paid spend is the real signal here, more than the launch itself.
how'd the community find it?