@sit_walk Not yet. How would you define an acceptable sample of such a thing? I think it has to be bad enough to be intolerable; anything less is unacceptably awful. Hey -- maybe it's a new type of Turing test!
@CarissaVeliz From an economic point of view, AI externalizes both the cost of information acquisition (by scraping IP from a co-opted web), and the cost of validation (because it cannot distinguish fact from fiction from hallucination).
@CarissaVeliz Also notable is that the metaverse is capriciously controlled and surreptitiously surveilled in ways that we would find entirely unacceptable in the natural world.
It is a gilded cage for the mind.
@sit_walk You obviously look like the Thornley who wrote, "EXAFS structures of technetium in BOWLS prepared under different redox conditions."
Seems some people just can't friggin' think, you know?
It's safe to assume that, when a billionaire spouts in public, it's strictly for his own amusement. Such excretions carry no useful information other than an insight into an unwell mind.
Simple expedient to temper the rise of an oligarchy: for every $10m of net worth, you must hire one well-paid minder whose job it is to monitor your actions and, when you attempt to communicate with the public, yell, "Shut the f*ck up!"
#oligarchy#EatTheRich
Just got email spam from an otherwise lovely restaurant because they used @Square as their payment system. Result: never ordering from them again. Blocking inbound & outbound from https://t.co/Va8p6cwcxd . Use them? Lose me.
@paulapoundstone Possible reasons:
1. It moves too quickly for them to get a fix on it.
2. They know where it's been.
3. They know that if they do, you'll use it as material for the rest of their lives.