Lukewarm take: we need to stop using mental health/therapy buzzwords in day to day life. Not everyone you dislike is a narcissist. Being sad doesn’t mean you’re depressed. There’s a resounding difference between being nervous and having anxiety. You’re not ADHD because you don’t like to sit still. You’re not autistic because you’re quirky. OCD doesn’t mean you’re organized. And for the love of all that is holy, not every situation that made you uncomfortable is “trauma”.
If I told you that you had to be somewhere at 7am to collect a cheque for a £1 million and if you were even 1 minute late you wouldn’t get it, you’d be there, in fact you’d probably get there early. You just don’t respect other people’s time enough which is a character flaw.
A man participated in an article in which he claims he breast fed his newborn child.
A breast feeding counsellor responded with disgust and alarm. Now she is being sued for villification by that man. Yesterday there was a hearing to determine whether evidence on the material harms of a man putting a hungry infant to his nipple is admissible as a defence to the villification claim.
Jasmine Sussex is showing tremendous bravery for not being silenced by trans activist lawfare. Good luck Jasmine!
https://t.co/WtrjEbTTbB
If Channel Nine weree going to sack @karlstefanovic for interviewing @TRobinsonNewEra because that is not the image Nine wants for their Today host, then consistency demands they also sack his co-host Sarah Abo.
She interviewed Nasser Mashni. A convicted violent kidnapper and terror supporter, who bashed a 15 year old child and has supported Hamas, repeatedly refusing to outright condemn Hamas' mass murder of Jews on October 7.
Nine should also sack every producer who set up the interview.
Or is that the image Nine wants?
Albanese in 2025: “I don’t negotiate with the Greens.”
2026: Negotiated with the Greens to pass his taxes.
Taylor: “When will you stop lying?”
Speaker didn’t allow the question.
🚨 Breaking: Labor cut a deal with the Greens to pass their budget tax changes.
Albanese lied claiming the Coalition rejected their tax cuts.
Fact: the Coalition offered a standalone tax cut bill. Labor blocked it to bundle them with their tax grabs and smear the Coalition.
I believe in Australians all working together towards the same goal under the same flag, regardless of skin colour, ethnicity or background.
That's what monoculturalism is - a country united by what we share rather than divided on our differences.
Don't believe the scare campaign - One Nation supports government-paid maternity leave. It just shouldn't be a cost that a struggling small business has to pay.
That's why One Nation also believes in income splitting, potentially saving families hundreds of thousands in taxes over the course of the child's life.
When asked about forming a Coalition with the Greens Richard Marles’ voice started to quiver, like he was going to cry
It’s looking increasingly likely that the only way Labor will be returned is with the Greens. Then the “Death to Australia” freaks will run the show
A vote for Labor is a vote for the vile Greens
Heaven help Australia
While we are doing our autopsies of Keir Starmer’s unimpressive premiership, I’d like to suggest he is a prime example of a certain personality type that causes us problems.
He has been a high achiever his whole life. From the 11+ onwards he passed tests and ascended every hierarchy he found himself in. This, I believe, shaped his worldview in a way that made him absolutely unsuited for the office.
For Starmer, you accept the rules of the system, you play the game, and when you win you get rewards. Number 10 was just the last objective that he earned by mechanically playing society like a video game - it was his by right for ticking all the boxes correctly.
His visible confusion and inability to grasp the job of actual leadership is, I think, a result of never having had to deal with the world beyond whichever social game he was playing at the time. Law is such a bounded game where a rigid, goal oriented thinker like Starmer can and did thrive.
A better leader would be someone who has some experience doing something which contacts base reality, where outcomes are not socially determined. Business, STEM, the military etc all fall into this category. Those people who spend their careers in the purely social feedback loops of law and politics do I think make poor leaders even if they excel at the process that gets them to the leadership.
Trans women are men. All of them. It is impossible for a woman to be a trans woman. What you propose means women losing their sex-based rights. Those are the rights under discussion.
If you want to campaign for trans-identified men to have their own spaces away from other men, have at it. But you don’t want that, which proves that your priority isn’t those men’s safety. What you want is for women to sacrifice their safety, privacy and dignity to validate men’s identities. You are, in short, a men’s rights activist who berates women for saying no to your fellow men.