@willo2_Poly I feel your pain, however…
If Polymarket was around years ago and you bet on Lance Armstrong winning Tour de France, and later overturned, how should that resolve, possibly years later? Reverse the decision?
@shtanga0x@willo2_Poly If Polymarket was around years ago and you bet on Lance Armstrong winning Tour de France, and later overturned, how should that resolve, possibly years later? Reverse the decision?
@bounceidc If Polymarket was around years ago and you bet on Lance Armstrong winning Tour de France, and later overturned, how should that resolve, possibly years later? Reverse the decision?
Many companies offer direct indexing. You pick your index, then can customize, screening to remove sectors or companies you don’t want to own. The balance is reinvested proportional. Usually sectors like fossil fuels for personal moral reasons or specific companies you believe are overvalued. Can also add automatic tax loss harvesting.
I agree the float will rise sharply, and the changing rules to speed inclusion in indexes, for an unprofitable company are worthy for thoughtful debate. My main point is the idea that trillions of index funds will be forced to quickly make disproportionally large purchases is wrong. Index purchases will be exactly proportional to the active float of every other company previously added to index. There has been a misguided idea that index purchases will overwhelm available supply.
@Fryz2394@ericjackson 1. You can buy up to 5% of company before disclosing.
2. Your own actions are not insider information. (Knowing what you are planning, prevents you from doing it?!?)
Obviously the markets couldn’t function otherwise.
FAANG- Valuation Mania
With Facebook (Meta) and Google (Alphabet) changing their names.
FAANG is now MAANA. If intel can continue its rebound, up 58% YTD, and join the club, we can complete the acronym, MANIA!