I am not one to judge others, Christianity or any religion for that matter. But it turns my stomach, the way you lean on and use Christianity to disguise the rot that lives inside of you. It’s like the lowest form of low. You are just a disgraceful human. You were the nasty chick at the bonfire doing unspeakable things. Your husband is a literal weasel. He looks like he smells. You both deserve each other. I just really feel bad for the children that have you leading them and teaching them how to do life. You’ve proven to be so bad at it. I hope none of the others have to suffer the worst of the consequences, like the other had.
It wasn’t to end sin. Actually, quite the contrary. It was so that we COULD sin. Private message me. I’m happy to educate you, at least to the best of my knowledge. I’m glad you’re asking questions though. Not sure if X is the platform to receive the best education, but a for effort.
For sure. But if you criticize a government. If you criticize a person. If you criticize someone who believes in any religion, that doesn’t mean you hate them on a deeper level. That just means you disagree with something they said, do or did. And that’s OK. So if a Jewish person likes the Patriots, and I like the Dolphins, we have different viewpoints I must be antisemitic, huh? Goofy world. VICTIMS 😜
@bjones306@CoryS44880@Rach4Patriarchy@RealCandaceO Wow. You’re really smart. I bet your friends and family are so proud of you. I know that I am! You win! And even better than that, you have my approval. Now go forth and conquer the world, my friend, you truly are an amazing specimen. I hope this helps you.
Hey look, he definitely lost but you are wrong with this post lol. I’m not trying to be mean either, but if you don’t understand that I do question your competence. He’s saying $50-$200 million in add revenue in relation to, Super Bowl ads. They were talking about how much money it cost to get ad space how much value you can attach to being in the national eye. So him spending the 300,000 to debate, Candace, brought so many eyes and clicks across Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube etc, that it is in essence, like paying for a Super Bowl ad.
Hmmm. I guess I can’t make a decision on that quite yet. I’d need to see it all, presented alongside of a timeline that points to him acting alone. Not sure where I stand yet. There’s a lot of misinformation, AI generated and tampered pictures and video circulating. I am suspicious of the narrative by the feds right now, though. That for me, is enough to be open minded to other possibilities.
It is irrelevant to me what the prompt was for either. All I’m stating, is that she has created a narrative of doubt that I find to be realistic and possible. I don’t care about any of the extra stuff. Liberals are so funny lol my only stance is there is plenty of doubt in the states narrative as it stands. If you don’t see that you are biased, and I feel bad for your lack of open-mindedness and self thinking. Letting your hatred and vitriol of someone else interfere with your critical thinking is one of the lowest forms of ignorance there is.
@CoryS44880@bjones306@Rach4Patriarchy@RealCandaceO Lol looks like someone didn’t watch the whole debate… I’m not 75 to 85% that he won the debate. I’m saying, Andrew stated he was 75 to 85%. Tyler was the lone shooter. Freaking doofus 🤣🤣🤣🤪
I tend to agree. I think anytime you’re a supporter when things like this happen, your biases take over. However, I did not go into this a true supporter of one or the other. I’m simply stating, I believe Candace has some valid points. Not valid evidence, but valid points that there is room for doubt and not one but a multitude of different pieces of submitted evidence. I’m not even saying that it’s all wrong, but in this day and age, we put a man on the moon? But we can’t get a clear picture of somebody? I don’t know, there’s some sketchy things going on and I’m open-minded both ways. I’m not firm in one stance or the other, rather I believe the state needs to own the burden of complete proof and provide solid evidence to put a man’s life on the line. I don’t see that so far. I’m not saying I see evidence the other way, but I certainly do not see the concrete evidence to support the states narrative.
It was never her goal to produce evidence. I don’t know why this is so hard for you to understand? She is simply saying there is room for doubt. There are gaps. There are inconsistencies. Grainy footage. Gaps in the timeline. Contaminated evidence for forensic and otherwise. Nobody is saying that Candace has created evidence. She has created a possible narrative based on inconsistencies. But her bigger and broader point is that maybe it is not as black-and-white, cut and dry as we think. Tyler Robinson acted alone, the end. I’m not even saying I agree with her 100% or she’s right, but I’m not ignorant enough or dumb enough to act as if there’s not question marks.