I've been using Hark this week and wrote up my experience. Claude, ChatGPT and Ollama are brilliant, but they're built around work, not around a life. Hark flips that: one never-ending conversation with real memory, plus an agent that actually gets things done, with your approval required before it signs in or pays for anything. Next I'm testing how far it carries into my client work. Full review: https://t.co/wFDKeZpye4
This new AI agent blew my mind
Hark is a proactive agent with a custom interface that completely transforms based on who you are
They gave me early access a week ago and I've really enjoyed using it
Here's everything you need to know about Hark:
By now I like hark pro very much. Feels different from usual chat. More like a real assistant. I’ll try and connect more to see where we can get. Current rating 8/10 due to security concerns. Whiteout these I’d rate it 10/10 at this moment (for personal use).
Aleph Alpha just released Kolibri, a 78B open-weight model built in Europe. Here's what you need to know.
Kolibri has 78 billion parameters, but only 3.46 billion are active per token. It supports up to 1M tokens of context. The weights are public under Apache 2.0, so anyone can run it on their own hardware. The German company launched it on October 3, German National Day.
The team built it fast. Work started in January. Nearly four months later they launched a first large-scale run, Kolibri Origin, a 30B-A3B model trained on 7.7T tokens. Kolibri scales that up to about 3x the data, about 2.5x the sparsity and 4x the trained context. Pre-training to release took under two months.
The team also reports on the model's strengths. They worked on German support in fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. Their RL setup runs 20K+ concurrent sandboxes per training run and 100K+ sandboxes overall. One outside write-up says Kolibri scores 96.9% on AIME. It says that beats every mixture-of-experts model tested, even ones about 3x bigger, and that only a dense model doing 8x the work does better.
Aleph Alpha also published a tech report of about 189 pages. It covers methods, results and limitations, and the team says it shares what worked so others pay less to try it.
Key numbers:
- 78B total parameters
- 3.46B active parameters
- Up to 1M tokens of context
- 24T training tokens, up from 7.7T
- 80B-A3.5B sparsity, up from 30B-A3B
- Under 2 months from pre-training to release
- 96.9% on AIME
- License: Apache 2.0
Kolibri is Aleph Alpha's first model release of this kind, with open weights, a full tech report and a German-English focus.
@stas_sorokin_ Grok would be great if you could do it. It's my "everything else" model that I also use on a daily base. It shows sometimes better results than Claude code (using Sonnet). Usually I use Grok to find improvements for the websites and to do an"audit".
Useful side-by-side, the model-vs-model landing page tests are exactly what I try to do for client sites. Do you run each model once with the identical prompt, or several times and pick a typical output? I find the variance between runs can be as big as the gap between models, so I am curious whether Grok would sit closer to Opus or Sonnet on the same brief.
That matches my experience: the moment you ask whether a machine can really do math, you end up asking what understanding is. When a model proves something, do you think the satisfying part, the insight into why it is true, survives if we only get the result?
I would also be curious whether you find explaining a proof to an AI sharpens your own view of it.
Agreed that organizational change is slower than the tech. From the consultancy side I see the bottleneck less in leaders understanding AI and more in the unglamorous workflow plumbing: who owns the output, how it gets checked, and where it plugs into existing tools. Do you see companies that move faster mostly because of a specific kind of first use case, or because someone senior personally uses the tools every day?
🚨 حدث تاريخي ينهي 30 عاماً من تاريخ الكمبيوتر الشخصي: NVIDIA تُجهز رسمياً على معمارية الحاسب التقليدية بضربة واحدة! 💻💥🧠
منذ 30 سنة وأجهزة الـ PC هي نفس المعاناة: معالج Intel أو AMD، كرت شاشة منفصل، ودعوات متواصلة ألا ينفجر الجهاز أو يتوقف عن العمل!
الليلة.. جينسن هوانغ وضع حدّاً لهذا العصر للأبد بإطلاق شريحة RTX Spark! ⚡️
🔥 الأرقام والمواصفات التي تزلزل الأسواق:
• ثورة المعمارية: لأول مرة من إنفيديا.. CPU و GPU وذاكرة رام (RAM) معاً على قطعة سيليكون واحدة بمعمارية ARM ودقة 3 نانومتر!
• قوة مرعبة: 1 Petaflop من قوة معالجة الذكاء الاصطناعي المحلي.. كل هذا داخل لاب توب بنحافة 14 ملليمتر فقط!
• أداء ألعاب مجنون: تشغيل ألعاب AAA على المسرح بسرعة +100 FPS وبدقة 1440p بدون كابل كهرباء وبدون أي حرارة أو هبوط بالأداء (No Throttling)!
💡 الرقم الذي يغير وجه التكنولوجيا للأبد:
تشغيل نماذج ذكاء اصطناعي ضخمة بحجم 120B Parameter محلياً بالكامل!
بدون إنترنت.. بدون سيرفرات سحابية.. بدون اشتراكات شهرية! الـ AI Agent الخاص بك يعيش داخل جهازك ويعمل 24 ساعة تحت سيطرتك المطلقة وحدك! 🔐
الـ PC لم يعد مجرد شاشة ولوحة مفاتيح.. أهلاً بكم في عصر محطات الذكاء الاصطناعي الشخصية! 🚀
احفظ المنشور وشاركه مع كل المهتمين بالتقنية والألعاب! 🧵👇
AI Agents = Fewer Tabs
The next big AI breakthrough probably won’t feel like AI. It won’t be a smarter chatbot.
A longer answer.
Or another impressive demo. It’ll feel like this: Fewer tabs.
Fewer copy-pastes.
Fewer handoffs.
Fewer things you have to remember. You’ll give something a goal … and come back to done. That’s when AI gets really interesting.