Good to see that the RSS debate is now attracting “legal luminaries” too.
I am ready to discuss, deliberate and debate this issue anytime, anywhere on law, Constitution, transparency and accountability.
And I sincerely hope this post targeting me by @JethmalaniM will not be billed to either the BJP or the RSS.
Mr. Mahesh, you say:
“A dynast indulged by inheritance does not become larger than the Constitution merely because he sits in a ministerial chair.”
Interesting pravachan coming from the son of Shri Ram Jethmalani.
A surname may open doors, but it does not automatically give weight to every argument. And certainly, invoking the Constitution while defending opacity does not make the argument constitutional.
Let me remind you of a basic distinction:
You are selected representative.
I am an elected public representative
Not once. Not twice. But, Thrice.
So, before lecturing me on constitutional morality, please answer the real question: why should any organisation of such scale, influence and public activity remain outside ordinary legal transparency?
Please get yourself appointed as the RSS designated legal representative and respond to our queries in my office if they allow you.
Also, this applies equally to all the “legal luminaries” writing editorials and delivering pravachans on TV.
PS: if you don’t mind me asking Mahesh ji, do your children:
- attend RSS shakhas
- spend time Gau Shalas
- drink Gau mutra
- Are they Gau or Dharam Rakshaks (at least part time)
If they aren’t doing it, are they also anti nationals like me?
BJP is saying that Dalits should not question RSS, why? Are Dalits not part of society, are Dalits not part of the Constitution?
If RSS is running such a bug organization in my state, they have to get registered or answer me under which you are operating.
— Priyank Kharge Ji to anti Dalit BJP
Elon Musk:”You get taxed on what you earn, you get taxed on what you buy, and you get taxed on what you own. And what does it get spent on? A bunch of stuff you don’t even agree with.
That’s why we need to reduce the size of government, spend less money and let the people keep a lot more of their hard-earned money.”
India’s IT ministry banned Telegram for one week because some users shared leaked exam questions.
This punishes 150M+ ordinary Telegram users in India — not the insiders who leaked the exam materials.
And the ban hasn't stopped anything. The leaks just moved to other apps.
Mr Bhagwat's logic that RSS doesn't need to register because it doesn't take government money is laughable. Will other organisations also be allowed to do the same?