Mike Boots 🇬🇧🇮🇱🇦🇲🇨🇾

Former non-ferrous metal stockholder, restaurateur, night club owner, security personnel provider. Father & Grandfather.

[Mike Boots 🇬🇧🇮🇱🇦🇲🇨🇾 @MickyBoots]

What Grok thinks of me, not too bad really 🤨

[Mike Boots 🇬🇧🇮🇱🇦🇲🇨🇾 @MickyBoots]

@Sabiha1278 400,000 is not enough

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I've been called out by @TahirAliMP in Parliament because I criticised his eager lobbying for the construction of an airport in Mirpur, Pakistan.

Let me repeat myself - I do not care about Pakistani airports.

British MPs should prioritise Britain over Pakistan.

EVERY TIME.

[Frank Stephens @justrightFrank]

This cop raped a 7 year old girl 3 times a week for 8 years.
He;
Threatened witnesses.
Pestered a 14 year old girl.
Abused another child and turned up drunk for work.
We all know who David Carrick is but no one knows who Mohammed Younis is?
Two Tier MSM?
https://t.co/oU2xLs7qam

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Because George Floyd's death could be made to serve the progressive narrative. It fitted the framework that the left had spent fifty years building. Institutional racism. Police brutality against Black people. White supremacy. Every element of the BLM ideological apparatus was designed for precisely that case. When Floyd died the machinery activated within hours. Starmer took the knee because the political cost of not doing so within that framework was higher than the political cost of doing so.

Henry Nowak's death cannot be made to serve that narrative. His killer used the progressive framework as the murder weapon. A racism accusation deployed against a dying white boy to manipulate the officers sent to save him. His case does not vindicate the ideology. It exposes it. Taking the knee for Henry would require Starmer to acknowledge that the training frameworks his party built, the Race Action Plans his Home Secretary advanced and the institutional capture his movement conducted over fifty years produced the officers who handcuffed an innocent boy while his killer chose his food in a police kitchen.

Starmer will never take the knee for Henry Nowak. Not because Henry was less innocent than Floyd. But because Henry's death is an indictment of everything Starmer stands for. Floyd's death was an opportunity. Henry's is a reckoning. That is the difference.

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

TROLLING US 🤯🤦🏻‍♂️

[Mike Boots 🇬🇧🇮🇱🇦🇲🇨🇾 @MickyBoots]

@Smirkley As thick as two short planks

[Right over Left Everytime @RightSide_Uk]

A British Army colonel has warned that civil war between Christians and Muslims in the UK is inevitable.
“The United Kingdom is heading towards civil war because the government fears stopping the Islamization of the country.”
This is not alarmism. It is the logical outcome of years of mass migration, grooming gang cover-ups, two-tier policing, attacks on British flags, and the deliberate suppression of native identity.
The establishment’s cowardice has created this crisis. The only way to avoid bloodshed is to halt Islamization now — secure the borders, deport criminals and failed asylum seekers, and restore British law and culture.
The warning has been given. Will it be heeded?

[Vivid.🇮🇱 @VividProwess]

Palestinian students at UNRWA schools:

“Stabbing Jews brings dignity to the Palestinians. We have to stab the Jews. They teach us that Jews are terrorists. I am ready to stab a jew and drive a car over them. I am ready to join ISIS.”

Does this seem like a normal society to you?

[Pat Condell @patcondell]

Burnham seems to be favourite to win Makerfield. After two years of relentlessly anti-British policies from this criminal Labour government, if the people of Makerfield elect him they deserve to have a house full of illegal migrants on their street, which is what will happen.

[Mike Boots 🇬🇧🇮🇱🇦🇲🇨🇾 @MickyBoots]

@RadioGenoa Fool

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I am a member of the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament and we have just released our findings on Britain’s broken asylum system. It is beyond damning.

Some extracts from our report…

“…Government departments still do not have a grip on how they will manage asylum as an end-to-end system, or a clear sense of what they are trying to achieve.”

“Major policy risks and operational changes have been pursued without a realistic grip on delivery risks, costs or system-wide impacts.”

“…no single point of accountability for outcomes or a governance structure for the end-to-end system.”

“…absence of a clear strategy, decisions around planning and resource allocation have been reactive and disjointed.”

“The Home Office was unable to show… that it has the commercial capabilities needed to manage asylum accommodation effectively.”

“…weaknesses in its ability to prevent excess profits accruing for contractors…”

“…no evidence that lessons from past mistakes are being used to clearly inform current actions.”

“Poor data quality and weak management information continue to prevent effective management…”

“…current data sharing limitations make it impossible to directly track individual cases through the entire asylum process.”

“The Home Office does not yet have a credible long-term strategy for asylum accommodation…”

“… there is little evidence the Home Office fully understands the impact of its approach on local services.”

“The government is at considerable risk of repeating past failures.”

But don’t worry, the government says it has a plan...

It says it has “learned a lot of lessons”.

And that it’s going to put 10,000 civil servants into what they call an “Asylum Group”.

Funded by us, of course.

How about improving data-linking systems?

The Ministry of Justice says it simply needs more of our money.

And what about ending the use of hotels and transferring to larger, “purpose-driven” sites?

“The Home Office’s own analysis suggests that large sites will cost more than hotels, as seen in previously costly attempts such as Wethersfield.”

The numbers…

£4.9 billion spent on the system each year, including:
£2.7 billion on asylum accommodation
£700 million on cash support
£600 million on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
Nearly £1 billion on casework, appeals, detention, and removal

All spent to produce between 50,000 or so refugees each year.

And of course, these costs don’t include what is then paid by us, the taxpayer, in Local Authority housing, welfare, childcare assistance, and advice and translation services once once they receive their refugee status and are no longer in the asylum system.

Want more?

At the time of the NAO report (December 2025), Home Office reported there were roughly 224,000 individuals still waiting in the system, excluding those awaiting an initial asylum decision.

Further, since April 2024, MoJ say the number of asylum seekers waiting for an appeal decision alone has trebled, from 27,000 to 70,000, with appeals taking nearly 60 weeks to be heard.

Who pays for them while they wait over a year for a decision?

Us.

And the tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers each year - what happens to them?

The Home Office isn’t sure.

It says it knows “where some of them are”, but the rest are “elsewhere in the country”, and that it is possible they “remain in the UK without detection”.

Don’t fear though, because the Home Office won’t guarantee that it will find them, only that it would “seek to find them”. Whatever the hell that means…

And to deal with the backlog of cases and appeals?

“Home Office relaxed its recruitment arrangements, resulting in newly recruited staff being ill-suited to making complex decisions on asylum cases, which in turn affected decision quality.”

The result?

“In a rolling twelve months to May 2025, 42% of sampled decisions had significant or fail errors.”

Astounding incompetence.

But there’s more good news...

The MoJ is recruiting even more over-paid salaried and fee-paid judges, as well as recruiting judges from other chambers to sit in asylum cases.

In other words, MoJ’s response is to spend more of our money and remove judges from other work.

This is because more asylum seekers “are now representing themselves and that this requires additional support from tribunal staff.”

“The system of monitoring failed asylum seekers needs a complete overhaul,” says the report.

I have a better idea. My own view?

Scrap the entire system altogether, and deport every single illegal migrant living in Britain.

And to those of you say that it’s impossible - to any MPs, public servants, or commentators who think I’m cherry-picking information, I implore you to read every word of the PAC report, every word of the NAO report, and to watch every minute of the 2.5 hour PAC meeting from earlier this year…

And then tell me that the system is working, and that’s it’s delivering value for money, and that it’s sustainable.

It isn’t. And it never will be.

It is an intentional, monumental catastrophe designed to cripple the nation economically, socially, and culturally.

A Restore Britain government will crush the entire asylum system as its first duty to the British people.

Deport them all.

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Oh look here’s a Labour MP spreading misinformation that Nigel Farage is a “danger to democracy”

Er … and then says misinformation needs to stop. She should start with herself.

Smearing political opponents as a danger to democracy is the actual danger to democracy 💣

[Malcolm Needs FBBTS @MalcolmNeeds54]

I see that the number of arrests after the Southampton Police/Henry Nowak protest has risen to FIVE and Starmer is almost incandescent with rage.
At Notting Hill Carnival in 2025, there were FIVE HUNDRED AND TWENTY EIGHT arrests, and he hardly said a word.
Two-Tier - as ever?

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

They are destroying TVs, laptops, antennas, satellites, and other electronic devices because they are haram and didn’t exist in Muhammad’s time. All while using their phones to film and post it online.

Stupidity knows no bounds.

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.

Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.

It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.

[Mike Boots 🇬🇧🇮🇱🇦🇲🇨🇾 @MickyBoots]

@patcondell Or, in any position of power/influence.

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

A Muslim woman screams at British police officers:

“We fought for this country! If you have any rights, it’s because we fought for them!”

Fun fact: More British Muslims volunteered to fight for ISIS than to serve in the UK army.

[Tee Rickey @OCRichardP]

"Life is hard...but it's harder when you're stupid."
~Sen. John Kennedy

[Mike Boots 🇬🇧🇮🇱🇦🇲🇨🇾 @MickyBoots]

@NotFarLeftAtAll @badtastemama As thick as two short planks

[Mike Boots 🇬🇧🇮🇱🇦🇲🇨🇾 @MickyBoots]

@peterrhague @MarkHiggie2 Did she ever learn anything in school ?