Horrible Harry!
Charles Reportedly No Longer in Contact with Harry After Feeling 'Bullied' by His Son's 'Tantrums'—'It's All So Horrid' - STYLECASTER https://t.co/3JNjOWmJ1D
@TheRoyal_TEA_ Looks like a briefcase Inspired no doubt by her objectifying times on Deal or no Deal
You can guarantee it’s a No Deal while the Markle is involved in it
@Tania_Esparza81 Doesn’t she just make u want to puke 🤮
Was she playing polo, was she scheduled to present the winners & was she invited on stage??
“NOT MY DUKE.” 👑
That’s the message coming from some residents of Sussex, who are questioning why Harry and Meghan continue to use titles tied to a county with which they’ve had remarkably little involvement.
We’re all wondering the same.
According to the Scottish Daily Express, the Sussexes have made just one official visit to Sussex as royals, in October 2018. One!
A Sussex resident put it plainly: “They’re not my Duke or Duchess… They are private citizens and should lose their titles.” Another said she resents that the couple are even named for the county.
To be fair, royal titles don’t require their holders to live in the places they represent. But that really isn’t the point here. The question being raised is: what meaningful connection have Harry and Meghan maintained with Sussex while continuing to prominently use its name?
That’s a fair question and the answer is, none!
@hellomag No, last year he chose to “honor”vets by wearing a poppy as he drunkenly leered at Kris Jenner’s tits! 😂
Plus he’ll NEVER be an official working royal ever again.
Why is Britain allowing these 2 lying skunks to live here? Why?
Inside Meghan Markle's England - 'fed up locals, pub fury and return to US on cards' - The Mirror https://t.co/tVWseONo6h