The working class rallies itself around the revolutionaries who have the clarity and discipline needed to provide good leadership. No matter how many people are in an organization, without a solid program or disciplined militants willing to uphold it, it’s all for nothing.
You cannot be a revolutionary if you do not love the working class. Anyone who claims to be a communist but hates the working class is just a narcissist who has been ostracized from their social environment and is ready to become a reactionary at the drop of a hat.
The Bolsheviks didn’t become revolutionary because they grew into a mass party. Rather, it grew because workers increasingly came over to an already established revolutionary program. Political clarity preceded numerical growth, not the reverse.
Most Western Maoists only read “On Practice” or the little red book.
But even though i do not consider Mao to be the best theorist, he wrote more than enough to show that he was actually very smart.
But no one reads this because the red book is better. You are not an illiterate peasant, you can actually read stuff. Do it.
>No Individual human body
>No Socio-economic classes
>No Money
>No State
Was the Human Instrumentality Project true Communization Theory praxis?
no healthcare. no vibrant middle class. crumbling infrastructure. grifters in every office. so all we have are tools and symbols of violence to flaunt that are antiquated useless to win wars but only useful to bomb poor third world countries. happy 250th