@BlackshepSusan The same thing happens with adverse effects from asthma meds, Montélukast particularly, but not exclusively. Even too much of a preventer inhaler will do it. You end up with anti-psychotics being pushed on you. (Thank God, I refused).
@psy_massondavid De rien. Pour beaucoup de femmes c'est un vrai problème en gynécologie. J'ai failli péter un cable il y a quelques années quand on m'a dit qu'il fallait être handicapée pour avoir droit à un frottis en autotest... Mais en gastrologie et chez le dentiste c'est difficile aussi.
@psy_massondavid Les TSA aussi peuvent amplifier la sensation douloureuse. Ou bien une personne avec un TSA peut avoir du mal à se faire examiner, ne pas supporter le toucher, et le médecin peut confondre cela avec de la douleur. Il y a un éventail de problèmes potentiels.
@BadreNicolas@klanigreen Agree. Except that one time I cried so hard about it that my tears bounced off the floor. It was not about "I don't have children", it was about, "I am a woman who does not want children. How did this come about?"
@BadreNicolas Good point. But there is also the fact that that desire does not arise for all women, and that is also something that comes up a lot in therapy. There can be a sort of ghost of what might have been, even in absentia of the desire to be a mother.
This article may be the most shameless and dangerous piece of disinformation I've read this year.
Genuinely sad to see a journalist throw away her career to boost one of the most dangerous campaigns of fraud in scientific history.
Quick fact checks:
1) The article claims EcoHealth Alliance was debarred by Trump's HHS, but it was done by Biden's HHS before Trump's inauguration.
2) The article claims that a lab origin of COVID is a conspiracy theory despite the fact that all US intel agencies, WHO, and the majority of polled virologists say it's a serious hypothesis requiring further data. FBI, CIA, DOE, and German intel all now favor lab origin. Even Andersen and Garry admit lab origin is a legitimate hypothesis when under oath (they should be brought back to Congress).
3) The article exclusively quotes scientists who were caught committing fraud on COVID origins. Andersen and Garry privately believed a lab origin was "so friggin likely" but published it was "not plausible" after meeting with the most powerful western funders of the lab. They were rewarded for this uniquely dangerous act of fraud via CREID.
4) Andersen attempted to delete early COVID seqs from a US preprint server "without leaving a trace" on behalf of Chinese researchers. Imo, this act of scientific sabotage elevates Andersen to the level of a serious threat to US national security and biosecurity. Between this action and the confirmed ghostwriting fraud, he should be permanently debarred from US taxpayer funds.
It's embarrassing that this was published in 2026. Disinformation to bolster threats to US national security and biosecurity is a serious matter @emilylmullin.
@TheGeoFight_com Still thinking about your "What if there is an actual volcano? " point. Disturbing, to say the least. Thank you for everything you are doing.
What happens if a massive volcanic eruption occurs while private companies are actively dimming the sun?
Seriously.
History already shows us that volcanic eruptions alone can cool the planet, disrupt rainfall, damage crops, and destabilize agriculture for years.
Now imagine layering millions of tons of reflective particles into the atmosphere ON TOP OF that.
What happens to global food production?
What happens to weather systems?
What happens if temperatures suddenly crash beyond what anyone predicted?
No corporation can control Earth’s atmosphere.
No private company should be allowed to experiment with the skies over humanity without public consent.
Yet Stardust Solutions is reportedly funded, operational, and preparing for atmospheric geoengineering experiments.
We do not consent.
Read the full breakdown and sign the petition to Stop Stardust at https://t.co/tzdhmXfZet
Join the fight. Donate. Share this everywhere.