@maxtoscano1@babyfleg Correct me if I'm wrong but you're basically saying that you don't think Bowers, specifically playing the TE position, will be anywhere near as valuable/impactful as Gronk, right? But you're not saying that Bowers can't be as impactful/productive as a player/offensive weapon
@maxtoscano1@babyfleg I think you're right in the sense that he'll never be the "presence" or play the same role as a Gronk but I think there's still a *chance he'll be as impactful/productive/valuable as Gronk. It's just too early to tell imo.
@babyfleg@maxtoscano1 Right? It's weird cause isn't this guy supposed to be like a "TE guru" or something? Just weird to make that type of claim two years into someone's career. Especially a top tier prospect like Bowers
@FantasyPros Yes. No point in playing dynasty imo if you're not trading or actively trying to trade. Aside from drafting (and winning), trading is what makes it enjoyable.
@VisionsDb @FFSnoog Nothing against snoog but he (and other content creators) seem to fall into this routine where it doesn't feel like they actually ask themselves if these trade scenarios are actually realistic lol cause 9/10 times, they're not.
@ISAAC4O8@WithersSF @CjamesFFB @DrJesseMorse The original post is the lobs guy claiming that aiyuk has serious knee concerns such as chronic knee instability and osteoarthritis. This is all about his knee lol. He prob didn't fight the voided guarantees/stopped showing up cause he doesn't want to be in SF anymore.
@WithersSF@ISAAC4O8 @CjamesFFB @DrJesseMorse That doesn't make any sense. Why wouldn't he fight against the voided injury guarantees if his knee is fucked? If anything, he should be fighting it MORE if his knee is severely damaged.
@ISAAC4O8 @CjamesFFB @DrJesseMorse It doesn't check out cause the 49ers voided his medical guarantees (I believe) last summer prob due to both parties wanting to part ways. If it was really a medical issue related to his knee then Aiyuk would've fought them voiding those guarantees. At least that's how I see it