✝️ 🇺🇸 Mike Compton 🇺🇸 ✝️

“Truth not Narratives
Education not Indoctrination
Justice not Retribution
Liberty not Tyranny”
God fearing, Liberty Loving, American✝️

[✝️ 🇺🇸 Mike Compton 🇺🇸 ✝️ @MikeCompton]

The word "hero" is used too often in today's society. It was an honor to meet @GenFlynn, a man who truly deserves to be called a hero. His talk was inspiring! As he says, "Local action equals national impact!" We, the people, must become involved in our counties and states!

[✝️ 🇺🇸 Mike Compton 🇺🇸 ✝️ @MikeCompton]

@MarrJurea @k8yanczer @ActforMissouri It is highly unlikely to even reduce it.

[Act for Missouri @ActforMissouri]

If you've been on social media this week, you've probably seen them: an ad promising Amendment 5 will "cut property taxes," and a meme claiming a judge "debunked" concerns about the Hancock Amendment.

Both are misleading. Both have been addressed by Missouri courts already. And both follow the same playbook — promise the benefits, hide the price.

We broke it all down, with the actual rulings, the amendment's own text, and a field guide for spotting this kind of messaging on any issue, from any side.

Read it here 👇
https://t.co/LIXtslosid
#moleg #actformissouri

[Amy M Castro @AmyMCastro1]

Missouri - let’s take the lead. Find Dr Frank at one of the stops in Missouri! https://t.co/82qDx3XQgp

[Sophia Shore @sophialshore]

“Despite a warning from Fitzpatrick before the 2026 legislative session… 2027 budget process resulted in an authorized increase, rather than a decrease, to General Revenue Fund (GRF) spending,”

Bottom line: your legislature continues to spend your tax dollars like drunken sailors. No more corporate welfare! No more special hand outs! No more selling out the great people of this state!

We should not even be in this place.

[Jake Jackson @realjakejacks]

After my Flock Camera Speech went viral, I decided to come up with a solution instead of just complaining online about it, so I drafted a resolution to prohibit Flock Cameras in Saint Charles. The Resolution is number 17-76, because 1776 is the answer to 1984 🇺🇸💯

[Jake Jackson @realjakejacks]

Proud to support @PhilPhiltourney and the rest of the USS Liberty survivors by getting his book!

[Act for Missouri @ActforMissouri]

State Representative Bryant Wolfin was our highest-rated House Member for the last two sessions! If we want to keep good people who will stand up for the Constitution and the People, we have to support them. If you can give, even if it's just a few bucks, please consider.

[Act for Missouri @ActforMissouri]

On August 4th, Missouri voters go back to the polls.

Before anyone asks for your vote again, remember January 2025.

Every Missouri House member who was there heard the same oath.
They heard the same choice.
They heard one path that defended centralized power in Jefferson City — and one path that called for power to be returned to the representatives, and through them, back to the people.

Then they voted.

Only 10 chose the path of reform.

If your representative was not one of those 10, then regardless of the excuses, the record is clear: they voted to empower the special interests, the leadership machine, and the uni-party power structure over the people of Missouri.

They may hope you forget.

Don’t.

Watch and share:
https://t.co/NuN5sQLlD6
#moleg #actformissouri

[Act for Missouri @ActforMissouri]

Going to be an interesting show to start the week!

[Ann Vandersteel™️ Renner for Governor of Florida @annvandersteel]

Tina Peters is FREE tomorrow!

June is TINA PETERS MONTH!
@realtinapeters

[Jake Jackson @realjakejacks]

Our nation needs men of character and spine to speak up and speak the truth boldly, loudly, and aggressively if necessary, even if others don’t like it or it goes against the grain. When a real man of character stands up and speaks, the world shakes, and cowardly men shudder in fear and anger because their egos aren’t a match. That is why I’m not liked by many.

[Jake Jackson @realjakejacks]

Article 1, section 15 of the Missouri Constitution: “That the people shall be secure in their persons, papers, homes, effects, and electronic communications and data, from unreasonable searches and seizures; and no warrant to search any place, or seize any person or thing, or access electronic data or communication, shall issue without describing the place to be searched, or the person or thing to be seized, or the data or communication to be accessed, as nearly as may be; nor without probable cause, supported by written oath or affirmation.”

Support my petition to ban Flock Cameras: https://t.co/5DjkJNitO3

[Act for Missouri @ActforMissouri]

Let’s get this done Missouri!

[Act for Missouri @ActforMissouri]

A respectful challenge to Christians supporting the new Amendment 3:

We are not asking whether you have prayed about it. We hope you have.
We are asking whether you can defend your vote from the written Word of God.

Not from polling.
Not from political strategy.
Not from “this is the best we can do.”
Not from “God laid it on my heart.”

**Chapter and verse.**

Let’s be clear: if the new Amendment 3 simply repealed Missouri’s terrible 2024 abortion amendment, we could support that. Repealing that evil would be a good and necessary thing.

But that is not where this amendment stops.

It goes on to write abortion exceptions into the Missouri Constitution — including rape, incest, fetal anomaly, and medical emergency. For rape and incest, it allows abortion up to 12 weeks.

That means the question before Christians is not merely:
“Is this better than what we have now?”

The question is:
**Does God permit civil law to protect some innocent children while leaving others legally available to be killed?**

Many supporters say, “This is the best we can do.”

But Christians should be very careful with that argument.

Scripture repeatedly warns us not to fear man more than God. The question is not whether the polling looks hard. The question is whether God has commanded us to do justice.

Over and over in Scripture, God places His people in fights too big for them so that they will know He is the Lord. He does not call His people to calculate obedience by visible odds. He calls them to obey.

If the child in the womb is an image-bearer of God, then we do not have authority to decide which innocent children receive legal protection and which ones become the price of political strategy.

Some supporters have appealed to Luke 15 — the shepherd who leaves the ninety-nine to rescue the one.

But that parable does not support sacrificing the one to protect the ninety-nine.

It teaches the opposite.

Jesus says the shepherd leaves the ninety-nine in the open country and goes after the one that is lost until he finds it. The Good Shepherd does not count the vulnerable one as an acceptable loss. He pursues the one. He rescues the one. He rejoices over the one.

If anything, Luke 15 condemns the logic behind Amendment 3.

Children conceived in rape or incest are being treated as the “acceptable loss” in order to politically protect others. Children diagnosed with a fetal anomaly are being treated as exceptions to justice. But they are not less human. They are not less innocent. They are not less made in the image of God.

And let’s be honest about the practical side too.
The claim is that this amendment is “better than nothing” and will save lives. But abortion pills are available by mail. Women can still travel to other states. And as written, the amendment itself does not require a police report, prosecution, conviction, or any clear verification standard before the rape or incest exception is used.

So we are being asked to compromise on innocent blood in exchange for a political promise that may not even deliver what supporters claim.

That is not a biblical standard.

God’s Word says, “You shall not murder.”
God’s Word says, “Rescue those who are being taken away to death.”
God’s Word says, “Open your mouth for the mute, for the rights of all who are destitute.”
God’s Word does not say, “Protect the unborn, except when the polling is difficult.”

So here is the question every Christian voter, pastor, lawmaker, and pro-life leader should be willing to answer:
**Where does Scripture authorize us to protect some innocent children while leaving others legally available to be killed?**

If we cannot defend that from Scripture, we should not defend it in law.

Repealing the 2024 abortion amendment would be good.

But replacing it with constitutional exceptions for the killing of innocent children is not justice.

Partial protection may be a political strategy.
Equal protection is Biblical justice.

The Good Shepherd did not sacrifice the one for the ninety-nine. He went after the one.

Missouri should do the same.

**Vote NO on the new Amendment 3. Demand total protection for every unborn child, from conception.**
https://t.co/XbWsvyTsK9
#moleg #actformissouri #AbolishAbortion

[Jake Jackson @realjakejacks]

Thank you everyone! I am overwhelmed with messages of support and accolades over my Flock Camera speech last night. I can’t thank everyone enough for liking and sharing this. I was one of two that stood up last night at the Council meeting, and now I’ve reached 35,000 people. The fight isn’t over. Stay tuned!

[The Robb Carter Show @TheRobbCarter]

People’s Lobby Missouri ‘s @realjakejacks speaking about the surveillance state being implemented. @PeoplesLobbyMo @ActforMissouri

[Act for Missouri @ActforMissouri]

For years, Missourians have been saying the same thing: it's too easy to permanently change our State Constitution. Stop letting out-of-state money drive radical amendments into our founding document.

That was the frustration. That was the call for reform.

So what did our GOP supermajority do with it? They used it against us.

Amendment 4 doesn't make it harder to amend the Constitution for everyone. It makes it nearly impossible for the PEOPLE — while the legislature keeps its same easy path. Simple majority. No extra hoops. Business as usual for Jefferson City.

Missourians wanted constitutional amendment reform. They got initiative petition elimination. Those are not the same thing.

And here's the part they don't want to talk about: if Democrats ever retake the General Assembly, they can still put gun control, abortion language, or anything else on the ballot through the legislature's path — with no district-by-district requirement. Amendment 4 doesn't protect the Constitution from radical change. It just decides who gets to make the changes. And the answer is: whoever controls Jefferson City.

The same supermajority that couldn't rein in spending, stop runaway property taxes, or deliver on conservative priorities for a decade somehow found the urgency to lock in their own power. They heard the people's frustration — and turned it into a power grab.

We believe it should be harder to amend our Constitution. For everyone. Including the legislature. This amendment doesn't do that.

We're a NO Vote on Amendment 4. Read or listen to find out why.

🔗 Read the full article: https://t.co/UV1J1NodCb

[Act for Missouri @ActforMissouri]

Is Missouri building a digital ghost town? 📷📷
Look at what’s happening in China right now. A recent MIT Technology Review investigation revealed that hundreds of AI data centers built during a massive, hype-driven rush are now sitting completely empty—with some estimates showing up to 80% of that new capacity going unused. Local governments chased the trend, threw subsidies at projects, and built massive infrastructure without actual, sustainable market demand.
Now look at Missouri.
Our state leaders and local political subdivisions are treating AI data centers like a modern gold rush. We just saw the announcement of a staggering $15 billion Google facility in Montgomery County, right next to an Amazon project already tangled up in citizen lawsuits over transparency and resource management.
But Missourians are pushing back hard. From the massive voter revolt in Festus—where residents just ousted half the city council at the ballot box over a controversial data center deal—to calls for permanent bans in St. Charles, communities are saying no to the intense strain these facilities place on our water, power grids, and tax structures.
Our politicians are calling this the "space race of our time." But if we don't slow down and listen to local communities, we risk sticking Missouri taxpayers with the fallout of a cooled tech bubble: massive, resource-draining concrete warehouses that stand empty.
We dive deep into this comparison, the hidden costs, and what it means for the future of our state's infrastructure in our latest article.
📷 Read "Code vs. Concrete" here: https://t.co/imoPDmiCbS
Let’s take China's empty infrastructure as a warning. Hype leaves a ghost town; real community impact lasts forever.
#moleg #actformissouri

[Sophia Shore @sophialshore]

Your worst sin is that you have destroyed and betrayed yourself for nothing.

Fyodor Dostoevsky

[AllAmericanGirl 🇺🇸❤️🇺🇸❤️🇺🇸 @catdeeann]

Data center debate heats up in Missouri https://t.co/fU6qEYuMBZ via @YouTube