@allenanalysis Additionally, I am happy the case was dismissed and anyone that willfully withheld evidence from the prosecution should in turn be prosecuted. The Olympian should also have his legal fees reimbursed
@allenanalysis Why do you lie? The US Attorney dropped charges, which is not the “throwing out” charges. The judge dismissed charges at the request of the prosecution….not hard to be honest.
@Sharman6642@allenanalysis The prosecution requested that it be dismissed because the department responsible for turning over evidence to prosecutors withheld evidence. Once prosecutors became aware they requested the dismissal
@backtotheuniver@allenanalysis Exactly, the prosecutor threw out the charges because one of the departments withheld evidence from the prosecution and when it was exposed the prosecutor dropped the charges.
@marny_g@allenanalysis Throwing out implies the judge is acting the request of the accused and dismissed is at the request of the prosecution, not the same message at all…same result but not the same message.
@maafa2001@allenanalysis Easy, one is the judge acting on behalf of the accused “throwing out” and the other is the judge acting at the request of the prosecution.
@kylegriffin1 A US Attorney works inside the Department of Justice, which presides under the Executive Branch, thus the Executive Branch has the authority to remove him. This has already been settled in recent SCOTUS Rulings.
@DemocraticWins 1997 was the last time Congress passed a budget on time and without continuing resolutions, so any member proposing a Constitutional Amendment is doing so for theater. First let’s see them do their most basic responsibility, a simple budget, in a proper manner.
@RightScopee B. What I have or anyone else isn’t negatively affected by Elon’s wealth but the 4,400 new millionaires thanks to SpaceX have been positively affected.