Fair. But I’m not comparing controversies. What I’m saying is, even if it were Rodgers, given his polarizing nature, the reaction to any of his comments would have also been responded to with outrage, and that’s simply because prime clearly wanted to ask controversial questions. That was their agenda. Therefore, it was a lose lose. I’d have preferred if they interviewed Jared Verse, and asked about the pressure of replacing Myles Garrett. But again, it’s clear what Prime was after.
@Louisavillain@lucy_rohden True. But it’s clear prime wanted to press Watson on this controversial topic. Given that truth, what controversial topics do you think they would have pressed Rodgers on?
@Br4dUppercrust@lucy_rohden Greatest football player ≠ great interview. You’re missing the point. Think deeper on this. Rodgers has his own controversies that elicit similar outrage. Try to consider the nuance, and counter to the point.
@thejoshuallenqb@lucy_rohden True. But he still has baggage that the public would have criticized with the same vitriol. He’s a polarizing person, and not for the best reasons.