@Talique188852@SabirIs58055710@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano Your point was Greenwood wasn’t charged. Utd also protected their asset. They kept his contract going, loaned him out sold him and included sell on clauses. They also went to bring him back but again the public made them change.
@Talique188852@SabirIs58055710@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano Oh and he met her, charges then get dropped and a few weeks later announce a baby together. I can get the crayons out and draw a pic to explain, but very consistent with the behaviour he’d been accused of.
@FUTURO_MUFC@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano 😂😂😂😂😂 hounded by the rest of the world, not by Utd! They kept him on the books, and sold him, with sell on clauses, knowing he’d been charged….you still held him to make money. Your fan base has no business discussing this subject
@mistertdot@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano Those fans have no business discussing this subject while sitting on a high horse. Well well informed before I posted. I probably wouldn’t try and be clever if I were you.
@mistertdot@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano First point. Never said we were right to stand by him, unless you can point to it. Read before you post. Second point, utd only loaned him, not sacked him (after public pressure) then sold and had a sell on clause. So they still get paid off a man eho was CHARGED.
@Kashiier@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano Again, I’m in no way defending Partey, but you have just defeated your own argument. He was not charged…..Say it slowly, He. Was. Not. Charged. Again Greenwood was charged. And why not rip his contract up instead of making moeny from him?
@reddevilsriot@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano See replies. Correct, not the same, Greenwood for formally charged. Partey not even named. Banished only after public pressure and after you made money from selling and having sell on clauses for him. Do you need a ladder to get off that high horse?
@Solo2United@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano Again, per my other replies. Greenwood was Charged, Partey not. Absolutely not a defence of his alleged behaviour. ‘Shipped off’, loaned, sold, sell on clause. Still making money from him. Good morals would have seen you cut his contract and make no money
@amakwe_c@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano You loaned himx sold him and included a sell on clause. Continued to make money from the guy AFTER he was charged with r*pe….not the win you think you have there fella
@Kashiier@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano One was not charged or named. One was. You didn’t exactly boot him out, you loaned him so he could play, get more value and sell him, have a sell on clause to get more from him. You are right, we are not the same, you continued to make money from a guy who was charged with rape
@SabirIs58055710@SimplyUtd@FabrizioRomano AND, if they had massive integrity, they would have cancelled his contract, they didn’t, they loaned him out and sold him with a sell on clause. As horrendous as it is, clubs will do what they can to protect the value of their assets before what is morally right