It’s amazing how many people on this platform have clearly never watched a real negotiation with a terrorist regime or any terrorist entity for that matter. This isn’t sunshine and rainbows. It’s pressure, consequences, and making it unmistakably clear that if the Iranian regime won’t change their ways, they highly risk being ended.
Let’s get something straight, because this keeps getting butchered, the civilization he is talking about ending is the Islamist regime, the assholes that took over 47 years ago and literally ruined the original Persian civilization in Iran that no one in the west seems to ever show empathy for. That distinction shouldn’t be this hard. And no, they shouldn’t be forced to be subservient to terrorists for another 50 years because you with 50,000 followers on some social media echo chamber said so.
While some rush to defend a failed terrorist state, that same regime has been hanging teenagers this whole past week. I’ve seen zero concern over that, they’ve also been sending 12 year olds to be cannon fodder. Spare me the outrage.
And to those immediately spiraling into “this means nuclear war,” please chill and relax a little. All this literally is ending a future nuclear threat. Not every hard-line equals global catastrophe. That’s not how this works. You’ve grown so used to watching terrorist pandering that you don’t even recognize what resolve looks like. The regime are paper tigers let them fold or make a choice that will lead to their ultimate demise.
As Winston Churchill put it, “We shall show mercy, but we shall not ask for it.”
@IlhanMN It's kinda cute that you think you understand the Constitution when yoyr actions say otherwise. Proving once again that voters never send their best to Washington. 🤷♀️
it's clear that the foundation for every media argument is a child's ploy. When told the basic laws of life -- like, how these actions will reduce violent crime, they respond with - and only with -"but why?"
Us: we really could use cooperation from local enforcement to get these felons.
them: "but why?"
Us: because that eliminates the risk of violent and tragic confrontations, unleashed by organized agitators.
them: "but why?"
Us: because if there is no cooperation, and no local police presence - you get horrible incidents like you've seen in the past week - incidents that don't occur in cities that cooperate.
them: "but why?"
us: Well, without the info pertaining to specific illegals, and a police presence to separate agitators from ICE, you get these tragic incidents.
them: "but why?"
us: well, in order to reduce crime by illegals in this country, you have to arrest them and deport them. but instead they're being held from us, and released without any oversight. And once they are back on the streets, they are free to commit more violent acts against citizens. This is what the agitators are agitating for.
Them: "but why?"
Us: Because you're all fucking idiots, and we're done with your stupid game.
Chaps, there's a reason these demonstrators are using whistles, horns, and making so much noise in all the video clips you are watching.
They don't do these when protesting climate change or LGBTQ rights.
Those sudden, impulsive noises trigger the acoustic startle response. It's a rapid, involuntary reaction mediated by the brainstem, involving muscle tension, elevated heart rate, and adrenaline release.
That repetitive exposure from them fatigues neural pathways but sustains heightened arousal, diverting cognitive resources from higher-order tasks to basic threat monitoring.
It is an acute stressor, activating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and sympathetic nervous system, which releases cortisol and adrenaline.
Long exposure to this stuff impairs prefrontal cortex function critical for decision making.
Pair this with the sheer annoyance, these tactics are a low-tech escalation of protest disruption, rooted in documented physiological responses to noise.
In layman's terms, they're putting these officers on edge and triggering them to act. Pretti and Good was exactly what they wanted. It's usually someone else who ends up dying and not the instigator.
This is a great example.
Watch the guy at the rear strike an officer against the head with an object. These officers, already on edge, are very likely to react to something like that. When someone ends up getting hurt, they're all innocent.
These events aren't random.
These are organised tactics. 80% of the people protesting aren't aware that they're being used by their own team as cannon fodder to generate outrage.
@PhilHollowayEsq You should see the kids who come work for me. I caught one of them trying to read a quarter to see what the value of it was. Fun fact: they can't read an analog clock or read cursive. 🫤
@RubenGallego You need to be put in check "Senator". You're part of the corruption, the promoting violence and creating the atmosphere that gets people killed. Sit down.