mmanu @[email protected]

#GravitiseurEntropicien #PhyzFond'amentaliste, (prêtre ?) manouvrier, lost in supertranslation beyond Καρκίνος

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

Je me sens très mmanouvrier.

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

Les uns liront peu & s'abandonneront à des recherches qui seront nouvelles ou qu'ils prendront pour telles ; les autres, manouvriers incapables de rien produire, s'occuperont à feuilleter jour & nuit ces volumes, & à en séparer ce qu'ils jugeront digne d'être recueilli & conservé

[Jim Williams @space_jim1]

BEST CAPTION WINS!🏆

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

@SchreiberUrs Do you know if it will be possible to watch it online?

[Graham Van Goffrier @notoriousgvg]

As someone looking to break into string pheno in the next phase of my research career, this is a gold mine and I strongly recommend ⛏️

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

Not long enough. What have I done just before X-mas?

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

How long will I resist before I download it ?

[Patrick Koppenburg 🐧 @PKoppenburg]

50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics -
567 pages and 4783 references occupying about 160 additional pages. https://t.co/kUWjum4k1s

Bon appétit
#ft

[Ahmed Eid Almheiri @AlmheiriAE]

Mark your calendars for this Jan 10: @NYUADInstitute is hosting a theoretical physics public event with talks by @CumrunV from @Harvard and Juan Maldacena & Nima Arkani-Hamed from @the_IAS + discussion moderated by ME! This is an unmissable event, register!https://t.co/jSbHb1VuIa

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

@ahron_maline Now I'm not fully convinced that "something like that must apply in general" but that would be great. So maybe the IR and the local physics aren't independent in the presence of gravity...

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

#EdWitten

What that man can do with little pieces of fundamental physics wisdom scattered across 50 years of litterature, is just absolutely unbelievable.

https://t.co/MHkVcqGPKl

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

@ahron_maline If by "the problem of time" you mean "the problem of finding a factorization law for an amplitude in the bulk" I would say yes in aAdS.

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

@ahron_maline You should also check [23].

These 2 papers contributed significantly to the origin of my tweet: they are the intriguing (to me) but not very well known recent papers that Ed seems to know everything about.

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

@ahron_maline Yes. You are right. (See ref. [28] for a more direct link with holography).

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

@abramakal a theory with anomalies.

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

There's another wonder out there, written by another wonderman, #CumrunVafa:

https://t.co/nNbFNonojt

These 250 pages lectures are the closest you can get from a modern textbook on #QuantumGravity, including all the string theoretic background, up to the swampland program.

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

@abramakal which also is a theory of everything.

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

@abramakal a consistent one.

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

The focus on the landscape is written by Monica Jinwoo Kang, with additional material from Nathan Benjamin Agmon. The focus on the swampland is written by Alek Bedroya. I did not read these yet, but I'll keep you informed.

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

The clarity of Cumrun's explanations, always going right to the point by the shortest path and the fluidity of his arguments are the driving forces of this masterpiece.

[Tolga Domurcukgul @TolgaDomurcukg1]

de Sitter: I've just found a new solution to your field equations.
Einstein: I don't care, you are in the swampland.

[mmanu @[email protected] @mmanuF]

@TolgaDomurcukg1 the usual since 50 years.