Before Blord put up that billboard, letโs start from the beginning.
A self acclaimed activist publicly called out Blordโs brand, labeled him a cheat and a thief, and told the public not to patronize him.
That is a direct attack on someoneโs business and reputation. By law, that falls under libel and defamation.
How do you damage someoneโs business in the name of activism?
If your goal is to make things cheaper for the common man,
why not start with things people actually use every day, electricity, airtime, food, cement etc?
He knows very well he canโt drag bigger brands like that. If he did, there would be serious consequences.
There was even a time he dragged a small brand and got locked up. What if Blord had taken that same route? He didnโt. That shows restraint.
Before judging Blord reaction, look at what led to it.
If someone publicly calls your business a scam and tells people to avoid you, your first reaction would likely be legal action.
But Blord didnโt do that.
Both sides have said and done provocative things.
But if we are being honest, the person who first attacked a business publicly and tried to damage it would be the one facing legal consequences first.
There is a saying that says โDonโt start what you canโt finishโ because they are people ready to go lower!
Blord was ready to go lower with the activist, which wasnโt the right actions he should have taken.
When you want to judge things, always start from the genesis and what led to it.
I will always speak fact because Iโm not here on the internet to kiss peoples nyash!
This app, you have to bring someone or group down to striveโฆโฆ
see what that guy is doing to Abazz
Same thing lobistar did to punters
Same thing Jay did to feminists
This App is a jungle.