I'm going to try something different here on the page.
We will be reading a book together as I post a chapter a day for everyone to read.
The book we will be reading is called Jesuit Hollywood, written by Shaun Willcock.
Important Notice (found on page 2)
The author has no objection whatsoever to anyone reproducing this
book in printed form for free distribution, provided it is reproduced in
full, including the cover, without being altered or edited in any way. His desire is for this book to be as widely distributed as possible. However,
anyone wanting to print the book for sale must obtain permission from
the author.
I do not make money from my Twitter posts, and nothing posted from this book is tampered with in any way.
If this goes well, I will be doing more books in the future.
Replies will be turned off for this so it doesn't take away from the book.
Supporting Christian Zionism is the same as supporting the Vatican.
Defending a nation or people that killed and rejected Christ is disgusting.
Placing themselves over Christ for being special is no different than a Catholic vicar.
🤮
Christian Zionism was birthed out of Jesuit Ideology called dispensationalism- the idea that God has separate plans for Israel and the Church and that the Church is just a pause in God's “real plan” for Israel.
This was conceptualized by Francisco Ribera in the late 1500s and then it was taken, twisted and popularized by scofield calling it Christian Zionism with his help from Samuel Untermeyer (Zionist Lawyer), the Oxford press (Jesuit Ties) and Protestants sympathetic too Romes long game.
The fact still remains that we are no different from them they are not special, and we are all part of the same seed through Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
They broke their covenant with God for the mysteries of Babylon... all of this is explained in the Bible if you people actually read it. Instead of using one verse told to you by an occultist as clickbait to your narrative.
Clearly, not, which is why he gave his son. This was never an argument to begin with.
God offered them New Jerusalem after this world is judged and destroyed through his son.
But they rejected it because they wanted something tangible, not spiritual.
Classic Gnosticism: “I want it now, not later.”
The real argument here is this:
The claim that “hating Israel is a sin and brings God’s wrath” is not scriptural.
Israel is not different from us, and they can either have faith in Jesus like the rest of us or be destroyed like the rest of the pagans.
especially when it says, "the Lord rejoices at their destruction."
All of this is their choice and trying to elevate them over Christ based on some covenant that was broken by them and fulfilled by Christ. Is some real Christian Zionist dispensationalism (jesuit backed, by the way) that leads to the anti christ.
The very thing that is supposed to make your skin crawl.
If Israel wants change, they should blame the tribe of Judah, repent, and cleanse their land of paganism.
They are not special while bowing to Babylonian esotericism.
Just like Catholics shouldn’t be revered for dressing idolatry in crosses.
And if a true nation of God was smart, they would distant themselves from these type idolaters. Not follow them, fund them, and certainly not by worshipping their status.
The land promise was fulfilled, though, and Israel repeated the rejection cycle. The rest I agree with, 🤣
Joshua 21:43–45 (AKJV):
43 And the Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein.
Leviticus 18:25–28 (AKJV):
25 And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.
26 Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you:
27 (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled;)
28 That the land spew not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spewed out the nations that were before you.
Deuteronomy 28:63–64 (AKJV):
63 And it shall come to pass, that as the Lord rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the Lord will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it.
64 And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone.
Pretty clear on why they do not fully occupy that land over there and wouldn't be if it weren't for the UN and their Babylonian masters.
Romans 4:13 (AKJV):
For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith.
Galatians 3:7 (AKJV):
Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.
Galatians 3:28-29 (AKJV):
There is neither Jew nor Greek… for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.
The covenant was on the premise of if Israel followed the Lord and was obedient.
Genesis 17:1–2 (AKJV)
And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the Lord appeared to Abram, and said unto him,
I am the Almighty God; walk before me, and be thou perfect.
And I will make my covenant between me and thee, and will multiply thee exceedingly.
Jeremiah 11:3–4 (AKJV)
Cursed be the man that obeyeth not the words of this covenant,
Which I commanded your fathers in the day that I brought them forth out of the land of Egypt… saying, Obey my voice, and do them, according to all which I command you:
so shall ye be my people, and I will be your God:
2 Chronicles 15:1–2 (AKJV):
And the Spirit of God came upon Azariah the son of Oded:
And he went out to meet Asa, and said unto him,
The Lord is with you, while ye be with him;
and if ye seek him, he will be found of you; but if ye forsake him, he will forsake you.
By answering Abrahamic covenant to that question, you essentially forsaked the covenant by canceling out the Messiah using a covenant that was fulfilled by Christ himself. Making a hypocrite out of God when he gave you his Son like the rest of us.
Once again, we can circle back to
Romans 11:20 (AKJV):
Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
Christian Zionism is of the occult. We are all the same under the blanket of Jesus Christ of Nazareth according to the scriptures.
Israel, as a nation, rejects Christ and believes their Messiah hasn't come yet.
Adventually leading to their anti- christ. Who they think he is their Messiah. Leading into again how their will only be twelve thousand from each tribe saved.
If the covenant was in place and God completed a blood salvation doctrine, it would read all of Israel was saved... instead, it's only the ones in faith that are saved from tribulation and judgment.
John 8:39 (AKJV):
If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
Galatians 3:16 (AKJV):
Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
Gensis 12:3 was fulfilled by Christ..
(One of the many reasons why the Jews killed Jesus and then rejected him.)
The true seed of Abraham isn’t a nation it’s Jesus. If you’re not in Him, the covenant doesn’t apply.
This goes back to
Romans 11:20 (AKJV):
Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
Blessing a Christ-rejecting nation will not earn any favor points. Despite what scofield thought.
And a nation that worships Baal and the babylonian mysteries will not be saved and brought into the kingdom accept through Jesus Christ of Nazareth like the rest of us. That covenant was squandered by Isreal, and God rejected it with his son.
I’m not boasting—I’m rightly dividing.
Boasting is saying “I deserve this.”
I’m saying none of us do—Jew or Gentile.
The natural branches were broken off because of unbelief (Romans 11:20), not because anyone boasted.
And Paul didn’t rebuke truth-telling—he rebuked arrogance that forgets grace.*
I’m not replacing the Jews. I’m recognizing that without the blood of Christ, no one is in.
The true root is Christ, not bloodline. That’s the tree we’re all either grafted into or cut off from.
If calling out covenant-breaking, Christ-rejecting Israel is boasting… Then what do you call rejecting the very Messiah who made the tree worth grafting into?
I’ve read Romans 11. It speaks of a remnant, not a national pardon. The branches were broken off because of unbelief, and only those who believe—Jew or Gentile—are grafted back in. Christ took the Kingdom from the faithless and gave it to those who walk in truth.
The truth is Isreal betrayed God not once but multiple times. God forgave, them sure, but it is stated over and over again how Isreal will be cut off, hated, and the reason why that is justified.
There is a reason only 144k will be called out of Isreal at the end.
Jews do not get a pass unless they have the blood of Christ on them, just like us Gentiles. Anything outside of that is esotirc occultism according to the Bible. Bloodline salvation doesn't work with God, and that is classic zionism.
The tribe of Judah was Isreals downfall in the sight of God. The term jew means you are from the tribe of judah. Judah caused isreal to sin and later took over the tribes and became a nation, which is why everyone calls themselves a jew these days.
Hating the tribe of Judah and its state should be part of the norm.
I don't agree with the idiot you are arguing with, but let's not try to make it out to be sin....
Ezekiel 36: 17-22 (kjv)
Son of man, when the house of Israel dwelt in their own land, they defiled it by their own way and by their doings: their way was before me as the uncleanness of a removed woman.
18 Wherefore I poured my fury upon them for the blood that they had shed upon the land, and for their idols wherewith they had polluted it:
19 And I scattered them among the heathen, and they were dispersed through the countries: according to their way and according to their doings I judged them.
20 And when they entered unto the heathen, whither they went, they profaned my holy name, when they said to them, These are the people of the Lord, and are gone forth out of his land.
21 But I had pity for mine holy name, which the house of Israel had profaned among the heathen, whither they went.
22 Therefore say unto the house of Israel, thus saith the Lord God; I do not this for your sakes, O house of Israel, but for mine holy name's sake, which ye have profaned among the heathen, whither ye went.
@JoseVictorHer10@TdotJdot2@BrockRiddickIFB@IfindRetards The internet runs on underwater cables...
Seems like the chinese have artificially inseminated you already.
And making it through this age should be your largest concern.
The term Christian started as a derogatory term first used in Antioch and was coined by Roman and Greek pagans to mock Jesus' followers, meaning "little christs" or followers of Jesus.
Followers of "The Way" sounds better than some derogatory term that was switched to a positive by a pagan Bishop named Ignatius of Antioch. 🤮
Catholics claim Jesus founded the church and entrusted it to Peter.
Just so we are clear, Rome killed Jesus and Peter.
Constantine loved his Sol Invictus Worship in shaping the Catholic Church
But somehow, we are supposed to believe they are Christian and not Pagan... 🤮
@stonewallz These accounts and the people following them are lapping up (revised memoradum reports).
Saw one that was revised and signed in 98'
The government slop is real today. Haha