Biofuel blending is okay
But imposing it all of a sudden is NOT.
Pros - Tackle import burdens
Cons - Common Citizens have to pay the price .
How ??
#ethanolblending#biofuel
Impact of E20 FUEL
On INDIAN VEHICLES AND CONSUMERS
A major nationwide study conducted by consumer platform LocalCircles highlights the severe on-ground impact felt by pre-2023 vehicle owners:
1.) Drop in Fuel Efficiency : 50% (1 in 2) of older petrol vehicle owners report a significant, noticeable drop in mileage since E20 became the default fuel.
2.) Mechanical Failures : 29% (3 in 10) have faced unusual engine wear, hard cold starts, or damaged fuel lines, injectors, and carburetors.
3.) Unexpected Financial Burden : 52% of older vehicle owners have had to spend between ₹5,000 and ₹25,000+ in unexpected fuel and repair costs.
Conclusion : 55% of respondents stated they want the government to bring back regular, ethanol-free (E0) or E10 petrol, with many (Rich ) willing to pay a premium to protect their vehicles.
#oil #petrol #e20 #ethanolblending
TMC associates did so wrong in their times that public himself taking care of all those atrocities.
This lady (TMC) allegedly used to send white sarees to those who refuses to accommodate as per TMC .
Now those same public giving it back.
You can only imagine the deep seated anger against the #TMC under #mamtabanerjee .
#bengal #kolkata
I congratulate @narendramodi honourable Prime Minister of India on his 12 years of Service.
If the @BJP4India had ruled India for 70 years with the same ideology it has today, instead of @INCIndia , India would be on par with China.
Both countries started their journeys at almost the same time, but different leadership philosophies led to different outcomes.
This is my reason tell us yours ??
What One philosophy #Nehru ji missed ? 👇
Had India rejected early diplomatic idealism in 1947 in favor of raw realpolitik, the establishment of an indigenous Military-Industrial Complex would have fundamentally altered the nation's comprehensive power through following compounding forces:
Defense R&D:
It is never just about weapons, it is the ultimate incubator for cutting-edge civilian technology.
The Foundry of Innovation:
Forcing indigenous production in the 1950s and 60s would have accelerated breakthroughs in precision engineering, advanced metallurgy, electronics, and computing decades ahead of schedule.
The Supply Chain Ecosystem:
Meeting strict military standards would have birthed a massive, high-tech domestic manufacturing ecosystem, transforming India from a consumer of technology into a global industrial pioneer.
What #modi ji would have picked ? 👇
Hard Power :
The Currency of Reliability In geopolitics, strategic autonomy is impossible without self-reliance. True reliability is built on capabilities, not alignment.
Absolute Strategic Autonomy: Eliminating heavy import dependency early on would have insulated India’s foreign policy from foreign leverage, supply-chain cutoffs, or spare-parts sanctions during critical geopolitical crises.
Asymmetric Regional Leverage: Transitioning from a defense importer to a major exporter would have made India the primary security anchor for the region. Nations align with a state that can guarantee their security through a robust, independent defense industrial base.
Conclusion :
By delaying a defense-first industrial strategy, India missed decades of compounding economic and technological growth. A visionary focus on hard power from day one would have built an economy anchored by industrial strength, ensuring that India was a dominant, self-reliant global superpower today.
#atmanirbhar was needed then .
@dhruv_rathee Corruption hai ISI wala bhi sath dega uske sath mil jayen ??
Pura pakistan sath de rha current govt ko girane me Pakistani ban jaye ?
https://t.co/lbPQIZRAeH
Desh ko 7 tukdon me baantne k liye tyar hai .
Name - Unknown
Profession- Advocate Delhi high court
Ideology - Cockroach Janta party
@barandbench@LiveLawIndia can you identify this advocate?
@SpokespersonMoD@HMOIndia
Deep seated happiness on dividing the country is quite visible on his face.
#cjp_पार्टी
Correction :
“Jawaharlal Nehru became Prime Minister of India on August 15, 1947 by sidelining Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose who was unanimously elected due to Mohan Das Karamchand Gandhi who threatened to separate himself if his ego is not satisfied - the likes of which have rarely been seen in the world. Over the next five years, modern India came into being.”
https://t.co/eDoX0SeZDJ
I congratulate @narendramodi honourable Prime Minister of India on his 12 years of Service.
If the @BJP4India had ruled India for 70 years with the same ideology it has today, instead of @INCIndia , India would be on par with China.
Both countries started their journeys at almost the same time, but different leadership philosophies led to different outcomes.
This is my reason tell us yours ??
What One philosophy #Nehru ji missed ? 👇
Had India rejected early diplomatic idealism in 1947 in favor of raw realpolitik, the establishment of an indigenous Military-Industrial Complex would have fundamentally altered the nation's comprehensive power through following compounding forces:
Defense R&D:
It is never just about weapons, it is the ultimate incubator for cutting-edge civilian technology.
The Foundry of Innovation:
Forcing indigenous production in the 1950s and 60s would have accelerated breakthroughs in precision engineering, advanced metallurgy, electronics, and computing decades ahead of schedule.
The Supply Chain Ecosystem:
Meeting strict military standards would have birthed a massive, high-tech domestic manufacturing ecosystem, transforming India from a consumer of technology into a global industrial pioneer.
What #modi ji would have picked ? 👇
Hard Power :
The Currency of Reliability In geopolitics, strategic autonomy is impossible without self-reliance. True reliability is built on capabilities, not alignment.
Absolute Strategic Autonomy: Eliminating heavy import dependency early on would have insulated India’s foreign policy from foreign leverage, supply-chain cutoffs, or spare-parts sanctions during critical geopolitical crises.
Asymmetric Regional Leverage: Transitioning from a defense importer to a major exporter would have made India the primary security anchor for the region. Nations align with a state that can guarantee their security through a robust, independent defense industrial base.
Conclusion :
By delaying a defense-first industrial strategy, India missed decades of compounding economic and technological growth. A visionary focus on hard power from day one would have built an economy anchored by industrial strength, ensuring that India was a dominant, self-reliant global superpower today.
#atmanirbhar was needed then .
I congratulate @narendramodi honourable Prime Minister of India on his 12 years of Service.
If the @BJP4India had ruled India for 70 years with the same ideology it has today, instead of @INCIndia , India would be on par with China.
Both countries started their journeys at almost the same time, but different leadership philosophies led to different outcomes.
This is my reason tell us yours ??
What One philosophy #Nehru ji missed ? 👇
Had India rejected early diplomatic idealism in 1947 in favor of raw realpolitik, the establishment of an indigenous Military-Industrial Complex would have fundamentally altered the nation's comprehensive power through following compounding forces:
Defense R&D:
It is never just about weapons, it is the ultimate incubator for cutting-edge civilian technology.
The Foundry of Innovation:
Forcing indigenous production in the 1950s and 60s would have accelerated breakthroughs in precision engineering, advanced metallurgy, electronics, and computing decades ahead of schedule.
The Supply Chain Ecosystem:
Meeting strict military standards would have birthed a massive, high-tech domestic manufacturing ecosystem, transforming India from a consumer of technology into a global industrial pioneer.
What #modi ji would have picked ? 👇
Hard Power :
The Currency of Reliability In geopolitics, strategic autonomy is impossible without self-reliance. True reliability is built on capabilities, not alignment.
Absolute Strategic Autonomy: Eliminating heavy import dependency early on would have insulated India’s foreign policy from foreign leverage, supply-chain cutoffs, or spare-parts sanctions during critical geopolitical crises.
Asymmetric Regional Leverage: Transitioning from a defense importer to a major exporter would have made India the primary security anchor for the region. Nations align with a state that can guarantee their security through a robust, independent defense industrial base.
Conclusion :
By delaying a defense-first industrial strategy, India missed decades of compounding economic and technological growth. A visionary focus on hard power from day one would have built an economy anchored by industrial strength, ensuring that India was a dominant, self-reliant global superpower today.
#atmanirbhar was needed then .
I congratulate @narendramodi honourable Prime Minister of India on his 12 years of Service.
If the @BJP4India had ruled India for 70 years with the same ideology it has today, instead of @INCIndia , India would be on par with China.
Both countries started their journeys at almost the same time, but different leadership philosophies led to different outcomes.
This is my reason tell us yours ??
What One philosophy #Nehru ji missed ? 👇
Had India rejected early diplomatic idealism in 1947 in favor of raw realpolitik, the establishment of an indigenous Military-Industrial Complex would have fundamentally altered the nation's comprehensive power through following compounding forces:
Defense R&D:
It is never just about weapons, it is the ultimate incubator for cutting-edge civilian technology.
The Foundry of Innovation:
Forcing indigenous production in the 1950s and 60s would have accelerated breakthroughs in precision engineering, advanced metallurgy, electronics, and computing decades ahead of schedule.
The Supply Chain Ecosystem:
Meeting strict military standards would have birthed a massive, high-tech domestic manufacturing ecosystem, transforming India from a consumer of technology into a global industrial pioneer.
What #modi ji would have picked ? 👇
Hard Power :
The Currency of Reliability In geopolitics, strategic autonomy is impossible without self-reliance. True reliability is built on capabilities, not alignment.
Absolute Strategic Autonomy: Eliminating heavy import dependency early on would have insulated India’s foreign policy from foreign leverage, supply-chain cutoffs, or spare-parts sanctions during critical geopolitical crises.
Asymmetric Regional Leverage: Transitioning from a defense importer to a major exporter would have made India the primary security anchor for the region. Nations align with a state that can guarantee their security through a robust, independent defense industrial base.
Conclusion :
By delaying a defense-first industrial strategy, India missed decades of compounding economic and technological growth. A visionary focus on hard power from day one would have built an economy anchored by industrial strength, ensuring that India was a dominant, self-reliant global superpower today.
#atmanirbhar was needed then .
I congratulate @narendramodi honourable Prime Minister of India on his 12 years of Service.
If the @BJP4India had ruled India for 70 years with the same ideology it has today, instead of @INCIndia , India would be on par with China.
Both countries started their journeys at almost the same time, but different leadership philosophies led to different outcomes.
This is my reason tell us yours ??
What One philosophy #Nehru ji missed ? 👇
Had India rejected early diplomatic idealism in 1947 in favor of raw realpolitik, the establishment of an indigenous Military-Industrial Complex would have fundamentally altered the nation's comprehensive power through following compounding forces:
Defense R&D:
It is never just about weapons, it is the ultimate incubator for cutting-edge civilian technology.
The Foundry of Innovation:
Forcing indigenous production in the 1950s and 60s would have accelerated breakthroughs in precision engineering, advanced metallurgy, electronics, and computing decades ahead of schedule.
The Supply Chain Ecosystem:
Meeting strict military standards would have birthed a massive, high-tech domestic manufacturing ecosystem, transforming India from a consumer of technology into a global industrial pioneer.
What #modi ji would have picked ? 👇
Hard Power :
The Currency of Reliability In geopolitics, strategic autonomy is impossible without self-reliance. True reliability is built on capabilities, not alignment.
Absolute Strategic Autonomy: Eliminating heavy import dependency early on would have insulated India’s foreign policy from foreign leverage, supply-chain cutoffs, or spare-parts sanctions during critical geopolitical crises.
Asymmetric Regional Leverage: Transitioning from a defense importer to a major exporter would have made India the primary security anchor for the region. Nations align with a state that can guarantee their security through a robust, independent defense industrial base.
Conclusion :
By delaying a defense-first industrial strategy, India missed decades of compounding economic and technological growth. A visionary focus on hard power from day one would have built an economy anchored by industrial strength, ensuring that India was a dominant, self-reliant global superpower today.
#atmanirbhar was needed then .
70 years of #congress couldn’t do it because it lacked a vision.
One thing that you liked in these 12 years of #modiji tenure as Hon PM.
For me it’s Defence sector (Hard power)
#rahulgandhi#modi#bjp
@vonderleyen@TajinderBagga@narendramodi “With you, India not only landed on the moon, it is shooting for the stars”
What a line
With you, India not only landed on the moon, it is shooting for the stars
I congratulate @narendramodi honourable Prime Minister of India on his 12 years of Service.
If the @BJP4India had ruled India for 70 years with the same ideology it has today, instead of @INCIndia , India would be on par with China.
Both countries started their journeys at almost the same time, but different leadership philosophies led to different outcomes.
This is my reason tell us yours ??
What One philosophy #Nehru ji missed ? 👇
Had India rejected early diplomatic idealism in 1947 in favor of raw realpolitik, the establishment of an indigenous Military-Industrial Complex would have fundamentally altered the nation's comprehensive power through following compounding forces:
Defense R&D:
It is never just about weapons, it is the ultimate incubator for cutting-edge civilian technology.
The Foundry of Innovation:
Forcing indigenous production in the 1950s and 60s would have accelerated breakthroughs in precision engineering, advanced metallurgy, electronics, and computing decades ahead of schedule.
The Supply Chain Ecosystem:
Meeting strict military standards would have birthed a massive, high-tech domestic manufacturing ecosystem, transforming India from a consumer of technology into a global industrial pioneer.
What #modi ji would have picked ? 👇
Hard Power :
The Currency of Reliability In geopolitics, strategic autonomy is impossible without self-reliance. True reliability is built on capabilities, not alignment.
Absolute Strategic Autonomy: Eliminating heavy import dependency early on would have insulated India’s foreign policy from foreign leverage, supply-chain cutoffs, or spare-parts sanctions during critical geopolitical crises.
Asymmetric Regional Leverage: Transitioning from a defense importer to a major exporter would have made India the primary security anchor for the region. Nations align with a state that can guarantee their security through a robust, independent defense industrial base.
Conclusion :
By delaying a defense-first industrial strategy, India missed decades of compounding economic and technological growth. A visionary focus on hard power from day one would have built an economy anchored by industrial strength, ensuring that India was a dominant, self-reliant global superpower today.
#atmanirbhar was needed then .
@DrAMSinghvi In that case you can’t call it “Democratically elected Prime minister”
Before constitution that’s 26/01/1950 Nehru ji was not unanimously chosen leader , he was forced upon India by Mohan Das Karamchand Gandhi .
https://t.co/xYFRgoSGB9
I congratulate @narendramodi honourable Prime Minister of India on his 12 years of Service.
If the @BJP4India had ruled India for 70 years with the same ideology it has today, instead of @INCIndia , India would be on par with China.
Both countries started their journeys at almost the same time, but different leadership philosophies led to different outcomes.
This is my reason tell us yours ??
What One philosophy #Nehru ji missed ? 👇
Had India rejected early diplomatic idealism in 1947 in favor of raw realpolitik, the establishment of an indigenous Military-Industrial Complex would have fundamentally altered the nation's comprehensive power through following compounding forces:
Defense R&D:
It is never just about weapons, it is the ultimate incubator for cutting-edge civilian technology.
The Foundry of Innovation:
Forcing indigenous production in the 1950s and 60s would have accelerated breakthroughs in precision engineering, advanced metallurgy, electronics, and computing decades ahead of schedule.
The Supply Chain Ecosystem:
Meeting strict military standards would have birthed a massive, high-tech domestic manufacturing ecosystem, transforming India from a consumer of technology into a global industrial pioneer.
What #modi ji would have picked ? 👇
Hard Power :
The Currency of Reliability In geopolitics, strategic autonomy is impossible without self-reliance. True reliability is built on capabilities, not alignment.
Absolute Strategic Autonomy: Eliminating heavy import dependency early on would have insulated India’s foreign policy from foreign leverage, supply-chain cutoffs, or spare-parts sanctions during critical geopolitical crises.
Asymmetric Regional Leverage: Transitioning from a defense importer to a major exporter would have made India the primary security anchor for the region. Nations align with a state that can guarantee their security through a robust, independent defense industrial base.
Conclusion :
By delaying a defense-first industrial strategy, India missed decades of compounding economic and technological growth. A visionary focus on hard power from day one would have built an economy anchored by industrial strength, ensuring that India was a dominant, self-reliant global superpower today.
#atmanirbhar was needed then .
You are spot on .
There’s much more going on .
Who knows after few years Vehicles Fitness certificate can be reduced to 10 years only instead of 15 ?
As it’s already known that vehicles of BS VI engines (2023) too getting affected by E20 leave alone E30 and isobutane …
Eeeeee matha kharab sala 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
https://t.co/YX5AP7E2h2
Impact of E20 FUEL
On INDIAN VEHICLES AND CONSUMERS
A major nationwide study conducted by consumer platform LocalCircles highlights the severe on-ground impact felt by pre-2023 vehicle owners:
1.) Drop in Fuel Efficiency : 50% (1 in 2) of older petrol vehicle owners report a significant, noticeable drop in mileage since E20 became the default fuel.
2.) Mechanical Failures : 29% (3 in 10) have faced unusual engine wear, hard cold starts, or damaged fuel lines, injectors, and carburetors.
3.) Unexpected Financial Burden : 52% of older vehicle owners have had to spend between ₹5,000 and ₹25,000+ in unexpected fuel and repair costs.
Conclusion : 55% of respondents stated they want the government to bring back regular, ethanol-free (E0) or E10 petrol, with many (Rich ) willing to pay a premium to protect their vehicles.
#oil #petrol #e20 #ethanolblending
Note : Abusive language is from someone who’s making the video.
The frustration felt by everyday citizens stems from how rapidly the rules changed, leaving the existing vehicular ecosystem very little time to naturally phase out.
2018 (The Original Baseline):
The National Policy on Biofuels establishes a target of reaching 20% ethanol blending (E20) by the year 2030, giving automakers and consumers a comfortable 12-year window to adapt.
June 2021 (The Timeline Accelerated):
Seeking to save foreign exchange on oil imports, the central government aggressively advances the E20 deadline by five years—moving it up to 2025-26.
April 2023 (The Manufacturing Mandate):
The government mandates that all new vehicles sold in India must be materially compatible with E20 fuel. Manufacturers begin using upgraded rust-proof fuel tanks, robust rubber compounds, and adjusted ECUs.
Early 2025 (Full Nationwide E20 Rollout):
India achieves its 20% ethanol-blending target ahead of schedule. E20 becomes the standard grade at almost all fuel stations across the country, effectively phasing out regular E10 fuel.
September 2025 (Legal Challenges Dismissed):
The Supreme Court of India dismisses a public interest litigation (PIL) requesting the mandatory continued availability of ethanol-free (E0) petrol at pumps, ruling that consumer preference cannot dictate national energy policies.
May 2026 (Push Beyond E20):
The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) notifies standard IS 19850:2026 to govern even higher blends (E22 to E30).
Concurrently, mass consumer data highlights that half of older vehicle owners are facing acute financial strain due to accelerated vehicle aging and falling fuel economy.
The Burden on the Common Man :
For the middle-class Indian, purchasing a car or a two-wheeler is a long-term investment, not a disposable commodity to be replaced every 3 to 4 years.
Because E20 has become the mandatory standard grade at the pumps, owners of pre-2023 vehicles are placed in an unfair bottleneck. They must either pay a steep premium for high-octane premium fuels (which often feature lower ethanol percentages) or continue using E20 while absorbing an invisible "tax" comprised of reduced mileage and early mechanical failures.
While the policy successfully saves the country billions in oil imports, it has shifted a notable portion of that financial weight straight onto the shoulders of everyday motorists.
@jmohan1070 Article 50 says separation of powers
SC will not interfere in legislatures actions .
In this case SC already said it
https://t.co/2CKtLp99hL
Impact of E20 FUEL
On INDIAN VEHICLES AND CONSUMERS
A major nationwide study conducted by consumer platform LocalCircles highlights the severe on-ground impact felt by pre-2023 vehicle owners:
1.) Drop in Fuel Efficiency : 50% (1 in 2) of older petrol vehicle owners report a significant, noticeable drop in mileage since E20 became the default fuel.
2.) Mechanical Failures : 29% (3 in 10) have faced unusual engine wear, hard cold starts, or damaged fuel lines, injectors, and carburetors.
3.) Unexpected Financial Burden : 52% of older vehicle owners have had to spend between ₹5,000 and ₹25,000+ in unexpected fuel and repair costs.
Conclusion : 55% of respondents stated they want the government to bring back regular, ethanol-free (E0) or E10 petrol, with many (Rich ) willing to pay a premium to protect their vehicles.
#oil #petrol #e20 #ethanolblending
Impact of E20 FUEL
On INDIAN VEHICLES AND CONSUMERS
A major nationwide study conducted by consumer platform LocalCircles highlights the severe on-ground impact felt by pre-2023 vehicle owners:
1.) Drop in Fuel Efficiency : 50% (1 in 2) of older petrol vehicle owners report a significant, noticeable drop in mileage since E20 became the default fuel.
2.) Mechanical Failures : 29% (3 in 10) have faced unusual engine wear, hard cold starts, or damaged fuel lines, injectors, and carburetors.
3.) Unexpected Financial Burden : 52% of older vehicle owners have had to spend between ₹5,000 and ₹25,000+ in unexpected fuel and repair costs.
Conclusion : 55% of respondents stated they want the government to bring back regular, ethanol-free (E0) or E10 petrol, with many (Rich ) willing to pay a premium to protect their vehicles.
#oil #petrol #e20 #ethanolblending