Hey @akirathedon, I'm still waiting for my Meaningwave vinyl I ordered in April. I have emailed your team and still no response. Please let me know what I can do about this, it's been forever...
@Lauren_Southern Would enjoy maybe setting a Skype meeting or having in a chat. Let me know if you need any help with your work here. Thinking of coming to the US soon, as well. If things keep going the way they're going.
@Lauren_Southern Hey Lauren. I just saw your videos about South Africa. I've been watching your videos for a while now and your guest spots on #LouderwithCrowder@scrowder If you're interested I can send you some links about recent articles posted in local news, etc. Let me know.
@Mkhize_vela@EFFSouthAfrica People already have the right that the EFF are proposing - now they just want to take away the rights of 'certain' other people.
I hope this makes it clear just how invasive this is to the rights of the people of our beautiful country.
@Mkhize_vela@EFFSouthAfrica (c) the nature and extent of the limitation;
(d) the relation between the limitation and its purpose; and
(e) less restrictive means to achieve the purpose."
@Mkhize_vela@EFFSouthAfrica limitation is reasonable and justifiable in an open
and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom, taking into
account all relevant factors, including—
(a) the nature of the right;
(b) the importance of the purpose of the limitation;
@Mkhize_vela@EFFSouthAfrica section is in accordance with the provisions of section 36(1)."
Section 36 - the Limitation of Rights, which is what this ammendment will do for current farmers. The rights in the Bill of Rights may be limited only in terms of law of general application to the extent that the...
@Mkhize_vela@EFFSouthAfrica The current paragraph 8: No provision of this section may impede the state from taking legislative and other measures to achieve land, water and related reform, in order to redress the results of past racial discrimination, provided that any departure from the provisions of this
@Mkhize_vela@EFFSouthAfrica That is very important to understand, this is what makes it fair to both parties. But by removing this section, it becomes a case of revenge and basically violating someone's constitutional rights.
@Mkhize_vela@EFFSouthAfrica to equitable redress." Basically what that means, is if land was taken from you after 1913, you have the right to claim it and the current owner be compensated, or you can be compensated for it.
@Mkhize_vela@EFFSouthAfrica Paragraph 7 that they want to remove explains - "A person or community dispossessed of property after 19 June 1913 as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices is entitled, to the extent provided by an
Act of Parliament, either to restitution of that property or
@Mkhize_vela@EFFSouthAfrica Paragraph 6: "A person or community whose tenure of land is legally insecure as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices is entitled, to the extent provided by an Act of Parliament, either to tenure which is legally secure or to comparable redress."