@pjexplained Kanpur me ssc ki taiyari karta tha..room owner bc roz gutkha mangwati thi subha shaam apne liye..aur apne papa ki pension nikalwane mere sath bheja karti thi..mujhe padhna hota tha par naa nahi kar paata tha.. mere jaise na jane kitne honge😣
@pjexplained Although as a kid I enjoyed the 2003 one more and I also find it darker. Especially the scene when the father and son were captured together.
@pjexplained I remember mai apne mmy ke sath 2003 wali Hulk dekh raha tha DVD Player me,Bhaai saab poori movie me meri fati padi thi ki koi Kissing scene ya intimate scene naa aaye warna mujhe ghar se bahar fenk denge. Par thank God wo Movie Pure Clean thi....
I suspect it is time to explain "Umpire's Call" again. After the ball strikes the pad, what you see is a projection of where the ball might have been, it isn't the actual ball because that has met an obstruction. If more than 50% of the ball is projected to hit the stumps, you can be 100% sure it will. But if less than 50% of the ball is projected to hit the stumps, the current accuracy levels cannot state with 100% certainty that the ball would have hit the stumps. Hence, you go back to the Umpire's original decision because you cannot be certain enough to overturn his call. It is a very good and fair method. As cameras get better and the projected path more certain, we could reach a day when you can be certain that even if the projected path shows a ball merely clipping the stumps, it would in reality have hit them.