Tin Pot Dictator

[Dante Rossi @tvc1five]

TRUTH ✅
⬇️⬇️

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

Unbelievable.
Was the Globe and Mail hoping we wouldn’t notice they changed their headline?
I think that’s an admission to just how bad the first one was. The one highlighted in green is the newly revised headline.

[Dallas Brodie @Dallas_Brodie]

Federal Liberal Attorney General @SeanFraserMP has refused to approve the prosecution of Charlotte Kates, director of Samidoun, a listed terrorist organization.

I filed the private prosecution after BC NDP Attorney General Niki Sharma chose not to act, despite the Vancouver Police recommending charges.

Why are Canada's Attorneys General protecting terrorist leaders from prosecution?

[Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 @ezralevant]

Or you could write the headline this way:

"Will Donald Trump save freedom of speech in Canada?"

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

🇨🇦 Canada didn’t run out of oil.
It made oil shameful.

Canada didn’t run out of land.
It made building impossible.

Canada didn’t run out of workers.
It made hiring unaffordable.

Canada didn’t run out of money.
It redistributed until nothing was left to invest.

This is what managed decline looks like from the inside. 🇨🇦📉

#cdnpoli #Canada

[Joe Warmington @joe_warmington]

Respectfully— Const.’s Tarun Bali and Marc Pinizzotto didn’t “lose their lives” and they won’t be able find their lives again. They were both murdered.

[Cory Morgan @CoryBMorgan]

I will continue to follow the rules as a third-party advertiser in this referendum.

I have to admit though, it feels a little pointless jumping through all the hoops while Thomas Lukaszuk can apparently ignore them with impunity.

[Lee Humphrey @tleehumphrey]

We already have a law on the books making the use of, or importing products made from slave labour illegal.

Team Carney is already ignoring that law by accepting vehicles made in China by BYD who use aluminum in their EV’s mined by Uyghur slave labour.

So why should we trust this @liberal_party gov to create a new law that they’ll likely just ignore too?

[Jon Alberta Patriot @JonFromAlberta]

I just finished watching this (2005) CBC documentary about the 1995 Quebec referendum.

It’s fascinating history, especially for Albertans.

Two things stood out.

First, around the 25-minute mark, Quebec separatists are shown building relationships with France and reaching out to the United States before the referendum. They were seeking recognition and discussing future economic relationships in the event Quebec voted to become independent.

CBC presents it as a matter of fact.

No panic.

No accusations of treason.

No outrage.

Just a recognition that if a region is considering independence, its leaders will naturally want to know what recognition, trade, and diplomatic relations might look like afterward.

Today, when Albertans have similar conversations with Americans, many of the same people immediately scream “traitor.”

Why?

What exactly is the difference?

Second, around the 50-minute mark, several political leaders discuss how important it is that a referendum question be clear and understandable.

That struck me because we’re seeing many of the same arguments in Alberta today.

Democracy works best when voters know exactly what they’re voting for.

Not when questions are engineered to create confusion.

Not when the goal is to muddy the waters.

Not when politicians try to manufacture a result.

History matters

And if you support Alberta independence, you should study Quebec.

Canada came far closer to breaking apart than many people realize.

For generations, Quebec maintained a strong identity, a distinct culture, and a vision for its future that often differed from the rest of the country.

English Canada understood that Quebec was different.

Yet when Albertans say we have our own culture, our own priorities, our own economic interests, and our own vision for the future, we’re told to stop asking questions and fall in line.

This documentary is worth watching; and I am nostalgic for when CBC had a semblance of journalistic integrity.

https://t.co/frbQ7yRHkn

[Chris Ryan @Watchdog_MP]

🔥 TREASON! 🍁

LCol (Ret’d) David Redman is dead right.

As a retired Military Police Warrant Officer who served on Air Marshal protective details for Prime Ministers and Governors General, I’ve seen what real threats to Canada look like and deliberate mass immigration with zero vetting is one of them.

Importing over a million people a year, many un-screened for criminality or loyalty, while our own citizens can’t find housing or safe streets? That’s not “compassion.” That’s betrayal for votes.

No background checks. No loyalty to Canada required. No regard for the consequences.

This isn’t incompetence anymore, it’s treason against the Canadian people.

Canada First means secure borders and citizens come first. Full stop.
#cdnpoli #CanadaFirst #SecureTheBorder #Treason

[RCMP Alberta @RCMPAlberta]

#CYH? RCMP in #LakeLouise seek info. May 28, vandalism and theft of 2 plaques at the Castle Mountain Internment Camp Memorial. Call 310-RCMP with any info.

[Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 @ezralevant]

Omigod David Eby is a moron.

He says Omar Artan, the Somali antisemite, is a "refugee".

No, he's not a refugee. He's a referee.

That's a different word.

And then Eby makes up a back story about Artan overcoming "incredible hardships and persecutions" as a refugee.

Moron.

[Albertan Beech 🌾 @albertanbeech]

I’m still trying to figure out how Alberta cannot apparently sustain itself if it separates, but it’s already sustaining all of Canada

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

Bill C-8 gives Liberal MPs the power to delete you from the internet.

No judge.
No trial.
No due process.

Just a politician deciding you’re a threat.

In 2026. In Canada.🚨

This isn’t safety legislation.
It’s a censorship bill with a friendly name. 🇨🇦🚨

#CdnPoli #BillC8 #FreeSpeech

[Marc Nixon @MarcNixon24]

According to the CTV panel, Canada’s problems are somehow Pierre Poilievre’s and Donald Trump’s fault

Interesting theory.

The people making the decisions aren’t responsible for the results.

That’s not analysis.

That’s political damage control.

[Sam Cooper @scoopercooper]

Read story in next post along with this question - no question in my view Carney’s government is knowingly engaging in negligence. Frankly diaspora groups should be bringing actions and raising the UK Home Office report that points to Chinese mafia tasked to corrupt MPs.

[Rob Anderson @FreeAlbertaRob]

I’m all for folks pointing out the potential risks of Alberta separating. That’s a healthy part of the debate.

But this whole “the separation debate is killing investment” argument is complete BS. Every economic indicator says the exact opposite. Every. Single. One.

Muzzling important discussions is foolish. Have a free and open debate and trust Albertans to make the right decision.

[Lisa @YoungStreete]

Canada has gone from having one of the wealthiest middle classes IN THE WORLD (reported in 2014), to relying on food banks and government rebates just to put food on the table.

This is what the Liberals, under Justin Trudeau, and now Mark Carney, have done to Canada.

Every Canadians should be livid. Demanding change. Why are they not?

#LiberalsDestroyingCanada

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

🇨🇦🚨Former top soldier warns against China pivot.

Because the military understands what Carney doesn’t:

🇨🇳 China is an intelligence threat
🇨🇳 China is a cyber threat
🇨🇳 China has interfered in Canadian elections

You don’t pivot toward a country actively working against you. 🇨🇦

#CdnPoli #China

[Shane Wenzel @ShaneWenzel]

It is fascinating to watch how the narrative shifts depending on who is in the chair. Back when the Harper government was in office, any dip or fiscal struggle was treated by the commentariat as a fundamental failure of his economic philosophy. Columnists like Andrew Coyne were quick to hold the Conservatives to the fire, criticizing deviations from fiscal discipline as a complete abandonment of their principles.
Fast forward to today, and suddenly the discourse is all about technical this and unforeseen that. We have gone from holding leaders to a high standard of market driven results to giving them a pass on the semantics.

The math of a recession does not change based on the party in power. If it was a crisis back then because of policy choices, why is it just a technical footnote now? We deserve a consistent yardstick. If you are going to be a critic, be one, but stop moving the goalposts depending on who is holding the ball. We are tired of the spin. Lets get back to some real, objective economic reality.