MY CONCLUSION B4 CLOSINGS:
**I DID CNN PRE-DEBATE, BUT THEN WATCHED SOLO, AND BEFORE I HEAR ANYONE ELSE’S OPINION, HERE IS MY OWN….
1 SHE PERFORMED BETTER BETWEEN THE 2.
2 EARLY NERVOUSNESS BUT SHE WARMED TO THE TASK AS NIGHT WORE ON AND TOOK THE CASE TO HIM.
3 SHE EXHIBITED NECESSARY DEPTH AS WAS HER CHALLENGE WHERE HER LAUNCH HAS BEEN SHIELDED.
4 FROM THE FIRST QUESTION ON “ARE YOU BETTER OFF THAN 4 YEARS AGO”, HE MISSED MANY OPPORTUNITIES TO PROSECUTE HIS CASE ABOUT THE BIDEN/HARRIS RECORD.
4.5 EXAMPLE…HE NEVER WORKED IN HIS STRONGEST CASE – INFLATION/ECONOMY.
5 HE REMAINED MORE MEASURED THAN USUAL, NEVER REALLY LOOKED AT HER. BUT NO WARMTH
5.5 HIS AGE WAS NOT A FACTOR – HE WAS APPROPRIATELY FOCUSSED, NO SR MOMENTS
6 BUT HE SAID THINGS THAT WILL GIVE FACT CHECKERS A FIELD DAY, IE. MIGRANTS EATING PETS AND ABORTIONS PERFORMED AT 9 MOS, WHERE???
7 SHE NEEDED TO DEFINE HERSELF WHERE 28% TOLD NYT/SIENA THAT THEY NEED TO KNOW MORE ABOUT HER, AND SHE DID.
8 PRE-DEBATE, NEARLY HALF BELIEVED SHE IS TOO LIBERAL..NOTHING TONIGHT REINFORCED THOSE CONCERNS AND TRUMP DID NOT MAKE THAT CASE
9 SHE WON THE DEBATE – BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THE NEEDLE MOVED TONIGHT - PEOPLE WILL SEE WHAT THEY WANTED TO SEE
10 THERE WAS NOT A SINGLE, KNOCKOUT MOMENT…NO ONE MEMORABLE LINE
11 MODERATORS DID DECENT JOB – TOUGH, DIRECT, LET THE CANDIDATES DECIDE THE OUTCOME, DID NOT OVERSTEP THEIR BOUNDS. COVERED LOTS OF GROUND.
##
Former President Donald Trump claimed during Tuesday night's presidential debate that Haitian immigrants are "eating the dogs" and pets in Springfield, Ohio. CBS News Confirmed found this statement to be False. Here's why. https://t.co/9JQX0qtauZ