Just a quick one on the Clancy trial.
I think it’s another energy harvesting psyop and it’s working because it’s keeping the normies entertained and arguing.
It’s almost identical to a case in Ireland from 2020. A mother of 3, also a paediatric nurse strangled her 3 kids while her husband was at work. He showed up just as it was all over and acted very strangely ever since - courting the media and organising fund raisers within days 💰
She was found not guilty by reason of insanity as she had postpartum, was on a cocktail of SSRI’s and had visited a hospital a week earlier and wasn’t admitted. Exact same story.
Both incidents happened on the same date:
Morley: 24th Jan 2020
Clancy: 24th Jan 2023
Both women were nurses.
Both husbands seem suspicious.
Both countries divided on who’s to blame.
Both sets of kids were 2 boys and 1 girl and had the same initials:
Morley: Conor, Darragh and Carla
(CDC)
Clancy: Cora, Dawson and Callan
(CDC)
PART ONE:
Can we talk about how Dr. Paul Zeizel has effectively become the face of Lindsay Clancy’s alleged psychosis?
Seriously.
Because the more you look into his background, the more wild the choice of expert becomes.
————————————————
Sooo quick recap- Zeizel never treated Lindsay before the children died. He arrived afterward, at the request of his buddy and her defense attorney, Kevin Reddington. This was 11 days after the killings, reportedly becoming the first visitor allowed to see her after ‘Red’ got a court order. 🤔
(Because that makes sense.)
He has since visited her roughly 60 times. 🤔
During Zeizel’s second visit, Lindsay used his personal cellphone to call Patrick. Zeizel says he listened on speakerphone while Lindsay told Patrick she had heard a male voice ordering her to kill the children and then herself.😐
That was two weeks after alleged killings.
And according to the trial reporting, Lindsay and Zeizel are among the only witnesses who have testified that she claimed she was hearing voices at the time of the killings. Her medical records before the murders contain no report to her providers of a voice telling her to kill herself. Zeizel conceded that under cross examination.
Which is kind of insane in itself.
So who is this guy…?
I’ve seen people reading his résumé like a list of reasons to trust him.
Meanwhile I’m over here, like “Holy fuck!”
Homeboy:
➟ Combat psychologist embedded with U.S. special forces in Afghanistan?
Wut?
➟ “International Experience” including Afghanistan, Cambodia and Thailand….
➟ Extensive forensic witness experience…
➟ Government, military and law enforcement involvement
➟ Department of Defense and Department of State
➟ DEA and other law enforcement connections
➟ A professional history intersecting with the Afghanistan contracting apparatus, including DynCorp (massive U.S. government contractor involved in Afghan police training, security, logistics and counternarcotics operations)
And this appears to be a family deeply embedded in adjacent fields.
His twin brother Jeffrey works in first responder mental health, resilience and crisis support, publicly describing decades of work around police, firefighters and DEA agents. Other relatives shown in the material I’ve seen has careers touching cybersecurity, threat intelligence and related security work.Some have been in big gross trouble as well..
That family network is a trip because these are fields built around mental health, intelligence, security, threat assessment, law enforcement and institutional crisis response.
Also, there’s Zeizel’s previous testimony.
In the Carlos Asencio homicide case, Zeizel supported an insanity defense after Asencio reportedly told him that voices commanded him to kill his former girlfriend and himself. Earlier clinical evidence raised at trial reportedly showed Asencio denying hallucinations.
So we’ve got multiple post offense evaluations. Multiple alleged command voices central to homicide defenses.
This guys methodology, prior testimony and institutional relationships aren’t even up for discussion.
They def should be.
@EricLDaugh Demons are more believable than Lindsay Clancy hearing a voice.. only once.. while she sent her husband on errands.. but not while she returned his phone call in between killing her kids..
@LagerthaMuadDib@1254tot1324 The Nanny, she had a nanny, a stay at home husband, several therapists, parents, in-laws and an entire drug dispenser in her cabinets. She is a selfish entitled murder.
At this point, the Lindsay Clancy case reads like a psyop to me.
Watching the trial only deepened my suspicion. The evidence, testimony, Patrick’s behaviour, both fundraising networks, the nonprofit that followed and the institutional interests surrounding postpartum mental health have left me questioning the story at its most basic level.
I’m not even convinced the children existed in the first place. That is how little confidence I now have in what has been presented. I question Lindsay’s identity, the marriage as presented, the timeline involving Patrick’s current wife and whether the people surrounding this case have relationships and affiliations the public hasn’t been told about.
Then ask what this narrative produces. And how many people are involved with ties to the following-
➟ More psychiatric screening and surveillance of mothers
➟ More medication and specialized maternal mental health infrastructure
➟ More nonprofit and research funding
➟ More institutional authority to intervene in families
➟ A cultural image of postpartum women as unstable and potentially dangerous
Zoom out further and the social effect is division. Men distrust women. Women distrust men. Marriage becomes undesirable. Children become liabilities. Families weaken and institutions assume more of the authority families once held themselves.
Strong families create loyalty, protection and independence. Atomized people are far easier to govern.
So I’m less interested in being told what to believe and far more interested in who gets funded, who gains authority, what policies follow and how many supposedly unrelated players ultimately benefit.
Because this story has holes.