@TheTigersBurner@Reddit_FCS Its not just about the last couple years. EVERY season since 1978 is factored in the calculation. Though more recent seasons to carry more weight.
@jamesaldrich25@FCSFansNation@Reddit_FCS How good a team has been (on average) the last 5 years is 41.5% of the calculation. The 10 years before that is 27.7%, the 15 years before that is 18.5%, and the 17 years before that is 12.3%
Updated FCS expectations tier list following the 2024 season.
Tiers show what general level of expectations can reasonably be had for each program going forward (and NOT for just next season) based on how good they have been in the past.
https://t.co/8vvcgeNvpw
@pstreat3@Reddit_FCS UT Martin has been a fringe T-25 team on average the last 5 years, but every era before that their average finish was outside the top 50. In fact most of the time they were averaging outside the top 75.
@Reddit_FCS Thanks for sharing the new version!
This time I also included a chart showing exactly how the different tiers are broken up based on equivalent weighted average finish.
Back in May, a fan over in /r/FCS proposed an FCS tier list for expectations of the subdivision moving forward.
And now that fan (/u/MT_Nate, aka @MT_NateP) is back with an update!
https://t.co/kXzRhK7JF7
@Brad64549130@Reddit_FCS The tier names are more just a way of classifying the tiers and not explicitly about the playoffs.
I thought about only including teams from conferences that play in the FCS playoffs, but the Ivies and HBCU's both receive votes in the FCS rankings so I analyzed them as well.
@bed__wards@Reddit_FCS They are the team I expect to "overachieve" the most according to the graphic.
The graphic is based solely on past results (to keep my biases out as much as possible) and they just don't have the history of success (2 winning seasons since rejoining FCS)... yet.
@skramerwrites@Reddit_FCS Idaho is the team I most expect to exceed what I calculated. They just haven't had the history of success yet (2 winning seasons since rejoining FCS) for the formula to have them higher on the list.
@JDWilliams23@Reddit_FCS I by no means expect it to be perfectly accurate.
It's really based on the old adage that "the best predictor of future behavior isย past behavior".
Another way to think about it is how good programs can be reasonably expected to be based on how good they've been before.