Mubarak Ibrahim Kani

UMYU Law student
| Future attorney |
| Justice enthusiast |

Studying law, changing lives
Aspiring lawyer with a passion for justice

Football lover💙
CFC 💙

[Mubarak Ibrahim Kani @MubarakKani]

May Allah make us among the righteous one

[Mubarak Ibrahim Kani @MubarakKani]

@MarufMuhammed4 Life is full of ups and downs
But the struggle will pay
Sir Check ur DM

[Rio @RioPresh]

I don go collect number again, like say i fit keep up the chat with her more than 2days

[MS Ingawa @MSIngawa]

If Messi likes let him miss penalty today and do own goal join I dont kiya😂😂

As far as Audu Kuri that came back against Uzbekistan is back to Portugal😂😂

I just downloaded 2022 World Cup 4k pictures and keep them on standby just in case😎

[AGBO OBINNAYA @AgboObinnaya]

It doesn't matter how "saturated" law seems to be. If God called you to be a lawyer, then there is room for you.

[𝙲𝙴𝙽𝚃🐬 @only1centt]

who get N1800 I wan purchase tangled carbohydrate and fried protein.

[fortune yongosi @fortuneyongosi8]

"Hey, can I see you today?"
I don't know…you are the owner of your eyes

[Ja Leto @_falsi1ke]

And if I ever needed help and you came through for me, please don't be afraid to wake me up even at 3am when you need help.

[OCHE💔 @Dan_baba04]

I tell this trenches babe say I dey feel cold
She say make I go near fire 🔥

no yawa, na when she need sub I go tell her make she go near subzero😂

[Pelumi @Msliterarylover]

Do you guys remember when we read Lonely Days, Native Son, Blood of a Stranger, Faceless, and Othello in secondary school?
Good old days

[Mubarak Ibrahim Kani @MubarakKani]

@ovedjerory I wanna be like you where do I start from

[ilymjsyk @g4na_xo]

I still dey face the repercussions for the spaghetti and turkey I buy last week

[Pharaoh👳🏾‍♂️👑 @MrMekzy_]

You’re free to choose but you’re not free from the consequences of your choice.

[Rukayya, ANIPR 🤭 @hayateey1]

Never abandon anyone that sticks with you at your lowest.

[HOTTamale 🫥 @Phertydalhrt]

Allahumma, help me speak the truth with wisdom, stand for justice with courage, and treat others with kindness. Amin 🤲🏾

[Iruoghene Wonders @_heisiruoo_]

please be humble!! even if you're an engineer, doctor or accountant... you're still a normal person, not an lawyer.

[ilence @Hilenceee]

Financial struggles have turned me into a bad son, a bad boyfriend, a bad brother and a bad friend.

[𝑴𝑵🪜 @mn_almustapha]

People are Mad sha. How can you start a breakup message with "Fa Inna mal usri Yusrah” (Verily with hardship comes ease.) And you think you'll make Heaven😭

[Tobechi Ogazi, Esq. @TobechiOgazi]

An Investigating Police Officer is not an eyewitness to the crime. His evidence is admissible when he tells the court what he personally did during the investigation. Once he begins to prove the truth of what others told him after the crime, that evidence may amount to hearsay unless those persons testify. The distinction matters. It can determine whether a conviction stands or falls.

See: Halilu v. Kano State (2026) LPELR 83907 (SC).

[Aspiring Billionaire SAN⚖️ @UsmanAbidemiEsq]

In Adebo v. Governor of Oyo State (2026) 6 NWLR (Pt. 2038), Supreme Court held that Section 28 of the Land Use Act does not require the government to specify the particular public purpose for the revocation of a land in the notice of revocation. Thus, once credible evidence establishes that the revocation was genuinely for overriding public interest and due process was followed, the omission of the specific purpose from the notice does not invalidate the revocation.

Lawyers on the TL, don’t you think this law should be amended to require that the government expressly state the purpose of every revocation in the notice for revocation served on affected citizens?

In my opinion, such a requirement would promote transparency and public confidence in the exercise of compulsory acquisition powers. We have heard cases of government taking over lands compulsorily without any specific reason. As it stands now, government can revoke land and later think about what it will use the land for. This will be justified by the current provision of section 28 of the Land Use Act.

A more balanced approach in my opinion would require the government not only to disclose the specific public purpose for the acquisition but also to implement that purpose within a prescribed timeframe. Where the land is not utilized within that period, the original holder should be entitled to apply for its reallocation or receive other appropriate remedies.

Thank you.
Usman A. Lanase Esq.
25-06-2026.