the Munchables exploit has been planned since deploy.
Munchables is a dangerously upgradeable proxy, and it has been upgraded.
Instead of upgrading from a benign implementation to a malicious one, they did the reverse here
1/🧵
End of an era. I've long since felt like an imposter. Holding punks, and potentially NFTs a whole hostage by not elevating 7804 in the way he deserves.
After over a year of looking around I feel I've found the right buyer with the right vision to appropriately elevate this asset
Today marks the 3rd anniversary since the birth of my first-ever art collection, LetsWalk. So, I'd like to take this opportunity to reflect on this particular collection.
This morning @cryptopunks 3100 sold for 4500 ETH ($16M) which is massive, but this punk has an interesting and sometimes scandalous story around it, so I thought I'd take a moment to talk about some of the stand out moments 3100 has experienced over the last (almost) 7 years.
Lets start at the beginning. @straybits claimed the @v1punks token of 3100 (along with most of the other aliens) on June 10th, 2017. This was within the first 24 hours after @larvalabs released Cryptopunks. The claim, of course, was free.
A few days later on June 23rd @straybits was airdropped the updated @cryptopunks token for 3100 which he sold a couple weeks later for 8 ETH (just over $2k at the time). The buyer would hold 3100 until March 11, 2021 when they would accept a bid for 4200 ETH ($7.58M) which was the highest Cryptopunk sale ever at the time. That anon buyer is the one who sold it this morning, all that history can be seen here:
https://t.co/GIhLyrh0R2
All that is exciting, but things get a little crazy after that.
In June 2021, a few months after the 4200 ETH sale, an artist named Ryder Ripps would mint a copy of 3100 on @foundation and publish a (now deleted) explanation saying this was a conceptual piece questioning what it is you own when you buy an NFT. This would sell a few days later for just over 2 ETH, check out that bid history:
https://t.co/leJ3lErzKA
Just after the sale Larva Labs served Foundation a DMCA takedown notice and they delisted his 3100 copy. Ripps would then mint and sell the DMCA notice for just over 1 ETH. It's currently for sale for 3.99 ETH.
https://t.co/H5xHY6a1KQ
Ripps would appeal the DMCA, and his 3100 copy token would be reinstated a few weeks later. This was long before the RR/BAYC drama which would later ensue, though it might have been the spark of the idea, and it was directly related to controversy at the time within the Cryptopunks community about who owned the IP to the punks that would eventually lead to @punk4156 selling his Cryptopunk ape and launching @nounsdao in effort to promote CC0.
https://t.co/zyUoe5nYf9
I recognize that in light of everything that would happen after this with Ripps and Yuga this bit of the story is something some people don't like, but historically I do think it contributed to Larva Labs selling Cryptopunks to Yuga Labs the following year, and is therefor an important part of the story of 3100, and some of the legacy that the new buyer just inherited. I wrote about some of this back when it happened
https://t.co/fEI1Lvy9J9
But that's not all!
In January 2022 @frankNFT_eth would release a wrapper allowing the bugged originally claimed Cryptopunks to be sold safely. @straybits still owned the V1 token, and when he started wrapping them an OTC deal was reached with fellow punk claimer and legendary collector Mr703 for the V1 version of 3100, which he held quietly until wrapping it in Nov 2023.
https://t.co/oqLtAjuKqg
Anyone who has followed my writings on this knows I'm an advocate for pairing up V1/V2 Cryptopunk tokens. These were "born together" so to speak and are both important parts of the story, and I think the most ideal solution is that they remain together in the same wallet owned by the same person whenever possible. These two tokens have been separated since July 2017, I think it would be incredibly exciting to see them reunited in this next cycle. What a cool chapter that would be to add to the story.
I'm hoping we learn who the buyer of 3100 is, and excited to see where this leads next. 🍿
So you are saying you will have written a smart contract on a ZK L2 which will check for a construction permit being issued , which in turn will create and send me an NFT that unlocks and delivers 250k in USDC when the oracle checks property and utility records and determines that house has been completed ?
The smart contract will continuously check for construction permits and create a new NFT for each incremental unit to be built ? Correct ?
We will use a multi sig wallet so that we both are protected.
Deal ?