Three days ago a gunman opened fire outside Venture-N, a Tucson gay bar. Two men dead. The shooter dead. Police now call it a targeted hate crime. He had a list of LGBTQ businesses on him.
You probably even didn’t heard about it.
Because the shooter wasn’t the approved villain. He WASN’T a white Christian nationalist. He was Ousman Ceesay, 44, a Muslim immigrant born in The Gambia. He confronted two men in the parking lot and started shooting.
One of the victims was Cameron Davis Capara, a well-known local photographer and left- wing political activist who spent years documenting pro-Palestine marches, anti-ICE actions, anti-Trump, anti-fascism rallies, and anti-capitalist “No Kings” circles. The other was Vincent Anthony Siqueiros.
Both were killed where they stood.
Police didn’t rush out a mugshot package. Some coverage danced around the shooter’s background. National cameras never really showed up. No wall-to-wall specials. No Democratic officials lining up at podiums to denounce homophobia and demand action. The story dropped fast.
That’s the tell. When the facts don’t fit the script, the outrage machine stays quiet. Two men get murdered outside a gay bar, the killer leaves a target list, and the same people who never miss a chance to lecture the country about hate suddenly have nothing to say.
If that doesn’t show you how selective the media and the virtue-signal crowd really are, nothing will.
🚨 UNBELIEVABLE: Darline Graham CANNOT answer a single basic policy question!
When asked about an abortion ban, she literally said: “I don’t know, I’d have to think about that.”
She is completely UNQUALIFIED to serve. South Carolina deserves better! 🗳️🇺🇸
@thomasbsauer you mean the wives that insist they are not asleep, even when they're eyes are closed? and then make you watch the whole thing over gain the next night?
fun fact nobody asked for: at 11:15 UTC today the sun shines on 99% of the world's population simultaneously. 8 billion people, one sunbeam. anyway good morning
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.
@ChrisMartzWX Still waiting for my house 1 mile inland to become oceanfront. my strategy doesn't seem to be working. Are you speaking at any events, or just relaxing?
🚨 PLEASE! CHINA IS A 77-YEAR-OLD PARASITE WEARING A 5,000-YEAR-OLD MASK: WHY THE CCP’S “ANCIENT” NARRATIVE IS THE BIGGEST CON JOB IN HISTORY! ☠️🤥
🕰️ The Historical Shell Game
The above headline cuts right through the carefully crafted propaganda of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Xi Jinping playing the “5,000 years” card is a masterful exercise in historical appropriation—it is an attempt to cloak a modern, radical, and fundamentally destructive political entity in the mantle of an ancient civilization.
🎭 The Fallacy of Continuity
The CCP is essentially a parasite that has latched onto the host of Chinese civilization. The distinction between “China” as a cultural/historical entity and the “CCP” as a governing apparatus is not just technical; it is existential:
• The Cultural Erasure: During the Cultural
Revolution, the CCP did more to destroy 5,000
years of Chinese history—temples, traditions,
intellectual lineage, and family structures—than
any foreign invader ever did. They treat the history
they claim to embody as something to purge or
rewrite to serve current ideological goals.
• The Modern State: The current regime is a
product of 20th-century Marxism-Leninism,
imported from Europe and adapted through the
lens of total state control. To conflate the CCP’s
77-year existence (since 1949) with 5,000 years
of history is a gaslighting tactic designed to
project an image of inevitability and permanence.
🧠 Strategic Utility of the “Ancient” Myth
Why does Xi lean so heavily into this narrative? It serves two primary, cynical functions:
1. Legitimacy in the Face of Instability
Because the CCP lacks a democratic mandate, it must derive its legitimacy from somewhere else. By claiming to be the sole stewards of an ancient, unbroken civilization, they position themselves as the “natural” government. This forces the narrative that opposing the Party is opposing China itself. It is the ultimate tool for domestic suppression.
2. Psychological Warfare against the West
When they contrast their “5,000 years” with America’s “250 years,” they are weaponizing a sense of historical inferiority against the American psyche. They want to project the image of a patient, sage, and eternal force, while painting the U.S. as a brash, temporary, and historically illiterate teenager. It is a psychological play designed to intimidate and to convince Western observers that China is a historical constant that will outlast any specific American administration.
📉 The Reality of the “New” China
The reality is that the CCP has created a nation that, in many ways, is more “modern” and “disrupted” than the West. They have traded their historical foundations for:
• Surveillance Capitalism: A society more densely
monitored and controlled than anything the Qing
Dynasty could have imagined.
• Rapid Urbanization: A forced, synthetic
transformation of the landscape that has severed
most of the population from the very roots they
claim to represent.
Xi Jinping knows that the U.S. is a young nation, but he also knows that America’s 250 years have been defined by a flexible, self-correcting system that can out-innovate and out-produce a rigid, aging bureaucracy. The “5,000 years” argument is just a distraction from the fact that, in the current ideological war, the CCP is a relatively young, fragile, and highly stressed experiment, headed toward financial ruin. A financial house of cards.
INSIDE BASEBALL: Xi Jinping believes AI will be China’s savior, but he needs the U.S. to survive long enough for China to steal the winning AI’s intellectual property.
📽️ https://t.co/fqImllAM0r
#TheGreatCCPDeception #HistoryIsNotTheParty #WakeUpWest #5000YearsOfLies #ExposeTheRegime #EndThePropaganda #SovereigntyOrSubjugation #TheAgeOfTruth