@aaliyahvtuber_ Hello. Can't stand alcohol or the taste. It needs to be at least fruity and sweet. Otherwise... no. I don't really drink to begin with, unless its coffee/chocolate milk.
@Azulafeetlover@Helldivers_NOW Remarkably effective in its lethality, which is also its primary weakness. I only ever dare bring it when I know I have open spaces, and a LOT of chaff to deal with, like bugs and voteless.
@corafortin The answer is simple in enough in our roots: "An Englishman's home is his castle".
You break into my house, I give zero fucks why you are there, you getting the universal warning, and nothing more: https://t.co/vpWDvSH0ob
@sabamaliktmhg "I do desire that we were better strangers." You can thank Shakespeare for that one.
Also "You are more foul than all the worms in the nile."
In a stand up fight of purely the air platform vs.
Hornet comes in a win. It's more agile and has far more system, that are more capable than the old Tomcat.
In an attrition war... Hornet still wins. The Tomcat was primarily built as a "Fleet Defender", which was the navy's term for interceptor role. While it could do *more* with modern systems, it still was designed for one job. The Hornet's more flexible mission systems, profile, weapons and so on, allows it to engage many more targets in a given combat area, *per airframe* vs the Tomcat.
Finally: Maintenance. Lets face it, as cool as those wings are, the Tommy is a hanger princess in many respects vs the Hornet. Lots more moving parts on those wings (especially the hinged hardpoints) than on the Hornet.
All that said. The Tomcat is still a very iconic aircraft that will be beloved by many, despite her days in the skies long over (at least for combat).