Dexplorer

Nothing But Decentralized Explorer/Father of JellyCats

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@Elektroveniks lol

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

The funniest post I’ve seen today was this one.
Thanks for making my day.
A team that destroyed one of the biggest communities out of greed, lack of transparency, and refusal to admit failure is now giving opinions about Web3 communities.
lol

[Mikhail/EL @Elektroveniks]

There is a hidden structure behind most successful communities you see out here today and 95% of plunging communities didn't fail because people just lost interest.

They failed because there was never a structure to hold that interest in the first place.

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@PortaltoBitcoin Stop posting meaningless data, and if you actually have a product after all these years, then deliver it. The price chart of your token looks more like a slow rug project than a functional one. Enough.

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@PortaltoBitcoin GM GM slow rugers

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@PortaltoBitcoin "If the product is real, even a simple screen recording plus on-chain transaction would settle everything. After six years, the lack of proof is not FUD, it’s a valid concern"

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@DanielKlaumann1 @srsh_os @Pact_Swap @PortaltoBitcoin P.S. You might want to share those unsourced posts you publish just to boost Portal’s weak page engagement in a more suitable community, though I’m guessing you don’t even know what that mean

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@DanielKlaumann1 @srsh_os @Pact_Swap @PortaltoBitcoin There’s no sign of this at all. What you’re basing this claim on is honestly surprising, and even if it were true, it seems that Portal hasn’t been able to live up to its own perfectionist ideas.

[Portal @PortaltoBitcoin]

SOL ↔ ETH swapped so far through the latest Portal demo flow.
No wrappers. No custodial bridges.
Just native settlement.

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@Unique_crisG Founders

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

When you and your buddies at the gym decide to launch a crypto project just because “there’s money in crypto”
$PTB

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@PortaltoBitcoin written in the kindergarten of Portal to Bitcoin

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@onyx_1805 @PortaltoBitcoin @csentropy I hope so

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@onyx_1805 @PortaltoBitcoin https://t.co/tmZh4QLVF8

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

When you and your buddies at the gym decide to launch a crypto project just because “there’s money in crypto”
$PTB

[Onyx_18 @onyx_1805]

What Actually Happened With $PTB?

I’ve been part of the @PortaltoBitcoin community for over a year now. I’ve stayed active, followed every update, and watched the entire journey unfold. And honestly, it’s time to talk about what’s been happening behind the scenes because the situation around $PTB has gone from confusing to deeply concerning.

The token is already down ~95% from its ATH right after TGE. That alone raises questions. But when you combine the price crash with years of development delays, unanswered questions, missing tokens, and on-chain proof of coordinated dumping, it becomes impossible to ignore what’s going on.

• 6 Years of Development… For What Exactly?

$PTB was originally meant to launch in 2024. Yet we’re nearly in 2026, and the product still isn’t ready. We’ve heard “very soon” for so long that it barely carries meaning anymore.

Aurelia testnet was supposed to run for only 3 months before TGE and mainnet launch. Instead, over a year passed with no real progress. No solid proof of working BTC ↔ ETH swaps. No working demo of SOL swaps, even after adding it to the whitepaper. Everything is still labeled as “internal testing” with zero public evidence.

If the product is real, even a simple screen recording plus on-chain transaction would settle everything. After six years, the lack of proof is not FUD it’s a valid concern.

• The Telegram Incident

The official Portal Telegram group was deleted by the team, claiming it was due to “spam” and “FUD.” But those who were active know the truth: it was full of investors asking valid questions about TGE, conversion ratios, DEX progress, and repeated missed deadlines.

Instead of addressing concerns, the team shut the channel down entirely. Cutting communication never builds trust it destroys it.

• Now Let's Talk About The $PTB Dump Because This Part Is Impossible To Ignore

Nearly 140M PTB (~$900k) was dumped through a cluster of 41 wallets within just 2 days on BSC. And these wallets were not random community holders.

Every single wallet followed the same pattern:

* Freshly created
* Funded with BNB by the same two wallets
* Received PTB from the same main wallet
* Routed tokens through an additional “hop” wallet
* And then sent everything to a Binance deposit address

This is not organic selling. This is not airdrop farmers. This is coordinated dumping.

The main distribution wallet behind all 41 wallets:
0xf731E69cA9798E3f6fb6C62C883B791D8Ac77b3C

And the timing makes it far worse: this entire dump happened just 2 days before the second airdrop claim, which the team conveniently delayed afterward. Clean coincidence? The community doesn’t believe that at all.

• The Community Wallet Problem , Where Did The Tokens Go?

The official “Community Wallet” listed on GitHub:
0x0C84e3697029987FBe61186199f376e555937179

This wallet originally held around 900 million PTB - roughly 10.7% of the entire supply. But just 6 days after TGE, the wallet was almost completely empty. Tokens were moved to multiple wallets and slowly dumped.

You cannot blame this on the airdrop because:

* HUB + Kaito airdrop total = 125M PTB
* Community wallet originally = 900M PTB

So where are the missing ~775M PTB tokens?

No announcement. No report. No explanation.

• The Airdrop Allocation Issue

The team promised:

* 2.1% for HUB users → 176M PTB
* 0.0645% for each Kaito season

But only ~70M PTB was actually distributed to HUB users and it was fully vested, which wasn’t clearly communicated. So again, where is the remaining 100M+ PTB from the HUB allocation?

Questions The Team MUST Answer

Question 1 - Why 6 Years of Delays?
What has actually been built? If swaps work internally, show:

* A real screen recording
* An on-chain swap
* A mainnet demo (which you claim has been live for 2 months)

After six years, there should be proof not promises.

Question 2 - How Did The Token Crash 95%?
Retail holders do not have enough supply to cause this kind of crash. Only team-controlled or foundation wallets hold enough volume to nuke the chart.

Stop blaming CEXs and market makers. No exchange can control your wallets and dump your tokens. If CEXs dumped $PTB, prove it. Show the wallets. Show the transfers.

Question 3 - What Happened to the Community Wallet?
It held 900M PTB. Airdrops used only 125M. Where is the rest? A project cannot call itself “community-first” while draining the entire community allocation.

Question 4 - Where Are The Team Buybacks?
You said the team is buying tokens. If so, show the wallets. Show the buys. Show the accumulation. In crypto, everything is on-chain.

Question 5 - Why Isn’t The Team Serious About Basic Operations?
The vesting dashboard could’ve been fixed anytime in 3 months. Instead, the team waited until the last moment. Now the page has been broken for almost 24 hours, and when the community asks questions, you call it FUD. No this frustration is caused by your lack of urgency.

This isn’t hate. This isn’t FUD.

These are real questions from real supporters who stood with this project for years.

If Portal is real - show the evidence.
If the tech works - show the proof.
If the team is confident - be transparent.

We expect real answers - not excuses.

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@PortaltoBitcoin I have no doubt you’re going to create something revolutionary, but it seems you still need more time, and especially more changes in your marketing...
Can't wait for product

[Portal @PortaltoBitcoin]

https://t.co/yiNye0ccN8

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@PortaltoBitcoin @CaseyBowman_BTC Let's make native Bitcoin Scalable with BitScaler

[Portal @PortaltoBitcoin]

Behind every ‘instant BTC swap’ is a lot of hard engineering.

@CaseyBowman_BTC , lead dev of BitScaler at Portal, showing exactly how channel factories and sub-channels make it possible.

[Dexplorer @NBDexplorer]

@PortaltoBitcoin Not your keys not your coins
Let's go