@Airdrops_one@NEARProtocol Great questions. Near are trying lots of things. First attempts are often assisted. Many won’t work out. A few might be big. More transparency would be useful
@Airdrops_one@NEARProtocol I feel we are in the same boat. High confidence in team, tam and mission. But always checking to see if it maps to reality. Keep up the good work. 🙏
In previous cycles it was actually consensus among those who did basic research that ETH would lead two cycles ago and SOL would lead last cycle. The tricky bit is not gettin distracted. It’s obvs $ZEC and $NEAR this time but v hard to sit on your hands.
Helius CEO @mert has joined the NEAR Foundation Council, NEAR Foundation’s governing body.
An early NEAR Intents user and leading voice on privacy, Mert brings an operator’s view to how NEAR builds and grows.
“For crypto to win, we need connected, unstoppable liquidity at planetary scale. A market of markets. Neither Solana, Zcash, or Bitcoin can win on their own, we must work together. And NEAR is how."
https://t.co/BG9gKqDKIU
@MoneyPrinter0x I would caution against this lens with the following example. I went deep on Kaspa and the tech was objectively better than other PoW chains. But without adoption it doesn’t matter. Near and SOL are the only teams that are exceptional at both IMO.
@chonkyy69 Fully agree. Just checked the daily active addresses on defillama. What a coincidence that it’s pumping on an illiquid weekend before an unlock.
Feels like someone is trying to fill a big fund with $NEAR and don’t really care about the perfect entry. They realise that anything under $10B is a bargain.
Every time I check $NEAR price I can’t believe how cheap it is. Honestly should be top 5. Ppl shilling $strk recently on fake quantum claims have failed to use both products. There is a massive gap.
Prices went a lot lower than I expected yesterday because I assumed there were enough rational KOLs in the space. Turns out there are about 5 and the rest can’t even do basic research. Anyway higher.