Objectively, you may have grounds to argue that Putin is not our ally John, and you are entitled to voice that view. But it is both inappropriate & irresponsible to claim that the Head of State, whom you (along with other MPs) mandated to represent SA in all official capacities (including foreign policy) is not acting on behalf of the nation. In fact, your statement implies that YOU are the voice of SAns on this matter, which is factually incorrect & misleading. As part kf the GNU, you share the responsibility for collective governance. If you disagree with the direction of foreign policy, put your argument forward, but stick to the merits even when you lose the debate. Publicly discrediting your own President’s mandate crosses a line and undermines the integrity of the gov in which you serve. Whatever you say now carries some weight because you are a Minister, so when you publicly challenge him in such a manner, especially on foreign policy, you undermine his authority AND weaken SA’s position internationally. His peers on the BRICS and global stage MUST take him seriously, so when you publicly cast doubt his mandate, it reflects poorly on the entire country. If he appears weak, we all appear weak as a nation and become the laughing stock of the world because he’s our face🤷🏽♀️ Yes, we can disagree with him here, but we must present a united front when we are outside and rally behind him.
🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
The rule that deals with interest on a debt called the induplum rule says that interest cannot be more than 100% of the capital debt meaning that if the debt is P2000 interest if the debt is not paid will continue until it reaches P2000 then it stops, if they pay P100 it 1/4