Congressman Steve Cohen has introduced six articles of impeachment against Chief Justice John Roberts.
The charges include allowing the Court to become a partisan weapon, placing the president above the law, endorsing a corrupt campaign finance system, and failing to recuse himself while his wife collected millions recruiting attorneys for law firms with cases before the Court.
Chief Justice Roberts has led the Court to the breaking point, with perceived political bias, arbitrary and unexplained rulings, and continually ruling for the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor and the broader citizenry.
See the six articles of impeachment and take action here: https://t.co/ovf6CucS24
#FightTheRight
The sitting president of the United States had to pay $5 million to a woman he raped and defamed, and not one person in his entire cult of a party is calling for his resignation.
Not one.
🚨BREAKING: In Las Vegas, ICE agents illegally entered a flooring business’s private property without a warrant, refused to leave when the owner demanded they get off his property, and then threatened to tase him.
In the video, the business owner repeatedly tells the agents to leave. But, instead of leaving, one agent arrogantly responds that they’ll leave “when we’re done.”
That’s not how the Constitution works.
If law enforcement doesn’t have a valid judicial warrant, they can’t force their way onto private commercial property in order to conduct a search… and they certainly don’t get to ignore the property owner’s demand for them to leave.
As the agents are finally walking away, one agent turns around and starts threatening the owner, and his employees.
The owner immediately asks, “Are you threatening us? Are you going to shoot us?”
That’s when the agent puts his hand on his taser… and pulls it out.
The agent tries to say he is giving them a “warning.”
Brandishing a weapon to intimidate someone, who is standing on their own property demanding that government agents leave, is the definition of a constitutional violation.
Which is exactly why the Fourth Amendment exists… to protect people from unreasonable government searches and seizures.
And when someone verbally tells government officials to leave their property, that speech is also protected by the First Amendment.
So, pulling a taser on the owner, while standing on HIS private property, as he tells you to leave, is not a “warning”… it is a threat.
Government agents don’t get to invent authority they don’t have. They don’t get to threaten people, especially while standing on private property. And they don’t get to ignore the Constitution because they think no one will hold them accountable.
If they actually had a warrant, they would’ve shown it.
Instead, they left.
🚨Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker
drops a NUKE on Donald Trump:
“It really is ironic…on the eve of the 250th anniversary of our country, a man sits in the WH who is everything that the founders feared … An uncontrollable, narcissistic, authoritarian president who acts like a king.
There’s a reason for Clarence Thomas’s blatant, in-your-face corruption. That piece of shit knows he’ll never be held accountable. And let’s not forget that his terrorist wife was a key organizer of January 6. Anita Hill tried to warn us all.
🚨 BREAKING: The House has PASSED @RepThomasMassie’s resolution to FORCE the release of names of Congressmen who used the Congressional slush fund to pay out for sexuaI misconduct settlements, 420-0
These are TAXPAYER DOLLARS being used to PAY OFF accusers.
And it’s all about to be public.
The Committee on Ethics must now preserve and public release all relevant records.
Trump sued the BBC to prove he DIDN'T send the mob to the Capitol.
To win, he has to hand over his Jan 6 phone logs and diaries.
You see the problem.
https://t.co/VIJAkLX9jx
The same politicians who spent years demanding answers about Hunter Biden’s finances should have no issue holding the Trump family to that very same standard.
If reports that Barron Trump is worth $150 million at just 20 years old are true, then Congress should be asking the exact same questions it asked about Hunter Biden. Where did the money come from? What business generated it? Who was involved? Were family connections, political influence, or foreign ties part of the equation?
Those are not unreasonable questions. They are the very standard Republicans established.
They launched investigations, issued subpoenas, and spent years putting a president’s family member under the microscope. If that was justified then, the same principle should apply now.
If Hunter Biden’s finances deserved years of scrutiny, then reported wealth tied to the Trump family deserves the same level of examination.
The standard should be the same for everyone. Fair is fair.