Poslední měsíc mě nebylo moc vidět. Na konci loňského roku jsem našel stopu peněz, které tečou do Česka na ruské vlivové operace a od té doby jsem byl zahrabaný hluboko v rejstřících, hledal v uličkách Londýna, naháněl různé bílé koně na Slovensku, v Chorvatsku nebo Srbsku.
Teď přicházím s první částí toho, co se mi povedlo dosledovat a myslím, že je to jeden z nejpolopatičtějších popisů toho, jak tečou a distribuují se peníze na ruské vlivové operace v našem regionu.
Začíná to na Seychellách, teče přes Británii, Slovensko až k nám do největších dezinfo webů. Hrozně zajímavá je tam role bílých koní - často lidé, kteří jsou více či méně na dně, ale pro Rusko představují ideální kořist.
Myslím si, že někteří z nich ani pořádně nevěděli, v čem vlastně jeli. Potřeba jsou hlavně jejich firmy a účty. Když mi do telefonu říkali, že ničeho takového nejsou součástí, tak trochu věřím, že si to fakt i mysleli.
Tenhle materiál je podle mě důležitý i v tom, že třeba v jednom případě to zničilo rodinu, ale ta vůbec netušila, v čem vlastně ten člověk jede. Budu rád, když to zasdílíte i dál, z hlediska fungování ruských operací v Česku je to za mě klíčové.
První díl v následujícím příspěvku👇
For all those who asked, here is a clip of @havivrettiggur responding to masked protesters interrupting his lecture at Haverford College on February 1, 2026. Enjoy and learn.
Češi v bleskové sbírce @DarPutinovi vybrali 50 milionů na generátory a další vybavení pro masivní výpadky proudu. Sbírka pokračuje dál. Nezůstalo utajeno důležitým představitelům kulturního života.
„Před pěti lety mi lidé po vyslechnutí mé úvahy říkali, že jsem exot. Před rokem už říkali, že se to stane jen možná. Uvidíme, co budou říkat za rok,“ říká k následující úvaze investor a majitel mimo jiné Dukla Praha Matěj Turek.
https://t.co/Sf4eXxe0cI
In New Zealand, native Māoris protest against Islamic immigration and destroy the jihadist flag while performing the traditional Haka.
“New Zealand is Christian. Muslims are not welcome here!”
Na hrdinu z australské pláže Ahmeda al Ahmeda se během 24 hodin vybralo už milion a čtvrt dolarů.
V nemocnici, kde leží ve vážném stavu, ho navštívil premiér. Ahmed je podle Guardianu muslim, Australan původem ze syrského Idlíbu, odkud se odstěhoval v roce 2006. Je mu 43 let, je otcem dvou malých dívek a vlastní obchod s ovocem.
Na Bondi Beach byl na kávě s kamarádem, když viděl co se děje. Když střelec vystřílel zásobník, využil příležitosti a vrhl se na něj. Sílu mu prý dal Bůh. Druhý střelec ho zasáhl nejméně čtyřikrát do ramene. Je po první operaci, má bolesti a čekají ho další dvě až tři.
Podle jeho rodičů, kteří se ze Sýrii přistěhovali do Austrálie teprve před několika měsíci, by Ahmed ochránil každého bez ohledu na národnost či vyznání.
I read Amnesty’s report. The findings are serious. The organization still isn’t.
Amnesty has finally published a detailed account of the atrocities of Oct. 7. It confirms that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups carried out deliberate mass murder, torture, hostage taking and sexual violence. It goes further than any previous Amnesty document and classifies these actions as crimes against humanity, including extermination. The evidence is overwhelming and the legal conclusion is correct.
None of this restores Amnesty’s credibility. The report opens by returning to Amnesty’s political narrative about Israel before it even describes a single Hamas crime. That choice signals priority. Shape the reader first. Cushion the findings. Reframe the context. This is not what a neutral fact-finding body does when documenting one of the worst mass atrocities against civilians in the region in decades.
The most important finding, extermination, appears deep inside the text (pp. 18–19 and 151) instead of standing at the forefront of the Executive Summary. To my knowledge, this is the first time Amnesty has ever accused a Palestinian armed group of a crime against humanity of extermination. Amnesty knows how significant this is. It also knows how politically inconvenient it is for a movement that spent two years casting doubt on survivor testimony and minimizing the scale of the violence. Burying the central crime reveals Amnesty’s discomfort with stating it plainly.
Amnesty also acknowledges that its own evidence collection was severely limited. It lacked access to most survivors of sexual violence. Witnesses were reluctant to speak to an organization that had already cast doubt on them. These limitations only highlight how irresponsible Amnesty was when it spent two years questioning survivor accounts. The problem is Amnesty’s double standard, not the survivors who refused to engage with an organization that had belittled their testimonies for nearly two years.
Survivors, therapists and first responders have been consistent since the earliest days. Amnesty was not. It demanded verification. It treated reports with suspicion. It amplified doubt. And now it uses its own investigative failures as a way to narrow and hedge its own findings.
The report further acknowledges that Hamas leadership intended attacks on civilians and hostages. The patterns are explicit. Coordinated killings. Systematic abductions. Messaging from senior figures. Yet Amnesty cushions these findings with language designed to preserve a political narrative of spontaneity and chaos. The evidence contradicts that narrative, but the organization cannot let it go. Phrases like “Israel’s prolonged occupation,” “apartheid” and “blockade” function as contextual mitigation for the perpetrators.
The structure of the report tells the rest of the story. Political framing dominates the front. The most damning material is placed later. On p. 8 of the Executive Summary, before recounting a single Hamas crime, Amnesty repeats its own 2024 conclusion that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. This ensures that supporters can cite the opening while ignoring the findings that follow. That is advocacy. That is intentional.
Even in the conclusion, a section that could have been dedicated exclusively to accountability for Oct. 7, Amnesty has to pivot back to its accusations against Israel and calls for pressure, sanctions and international action. The report becomes a pretext to restate its general political program. A credible human rights body separates findings from advocacy. Amnesty blends them.
Amnesty did not suddenly become rigorous. It was cornered. The evidence was too strong, the testimonies too many, the footage too clear. It may have finally documented some of these atrocities, but it did nothing to repair its credibility.
https://t.co/tM6fEPJ99T
The BBC refused to air this. Islamic Relief knew this propaganda existed and used it to steal donations. This is children’s food that Hamas, the Palestinian Muslim Brotherhood, hid so kids would starve, the world would cry, and Israel would be blamed. A manufactured famine. A weaponized hunger. @CAIRNational knew.And they stayed silent, because Gaza’s tragedy became their golden ticket to spread influence in America and turn millions into hostages of Hamas propaganda.
@Ilhan knows too. She won’t condemn it, just as she never condemned the filth of marrying her own brother or standing with the Iranian regime against the brave women of Iran.
This is the reality:
Those who screamed “genocide” and “starvation” at Israel were the very people orchestrating it, hiding food, filming hunger, and building a narrative of lies.
I’m not here defending Israel.
I’m telling you the truth: the Muslim Brotherhood made you a prisoner of their propaganda. They used your anger, your compassion, and your lack of information to turn you against your own universities, your own streets, your Jewish neighbours. They created a global riot while they were starving children.
And today, the Muslim Brotherhood led army in Sudan is repeating the same crime, starving 5 million people, with 200,000 children expected to die by the end of the year.
So the question is simple:
How many will finally condemn this filth? How many will admit they were manipulated by the very monsters who let children die for a headline?
UPDATE:
• For the first time ever at the UN, Germany, Italy, Czechia, Latvia & Bulgaria withheld support for renewing UNRWA's mandate, a “remarkable political shift.”
• Naples, Florence, Turin freeze awards for Francesca Albanese after she endorsed violent attacks
• & more ▶️
During the worst of the days of the hunger crisis in Gaza in the past six months, Hamas deliberately hid literal tons of infant formula and nutritional shakes for children by storing them in clandestine warehouses belonging to the Gaza Ministry of Health.
The goal, as I said then, was to worsen the hunger crisis and initiate a disaster as part of the terror group’s famine narrative in a desperate effort to stop Israel’s onslaught against Gaza and force the return of the UN’s aid distribution mechanism, and away from the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Now, activists in the Strip are documenting the waste and deliberate disposal of tons of infant formula, nutritional children’s shake, and children’s powdered milk, which Hamas had hoarded away, given the saturation of the coastal enclave with humanitarian aid after the ceasefire two months ago.
When countless other Palestinian activists and I from Gaza said this back in July, August, and September, we were villainized, attacked, threatened, and made into pariahs by the “pro-Palestine” industrial complex and activist mafias, even though for Gazans, the evidence was so clearly apparent before our eyes. What those in the West continue to fail to understand is that there is no being pro-Palestine without also having a serious vigilance against Hamas’s continued manipulation of international public opinion to hide behind the Strip's civilian population's suffering, something that the terrorist organization’s own actions have led to and created.
Never allow yourself to be a useful idiot in Hamas’s propaganda. You can have compassion for the real suffering of the Palestinian civilians of Gaza, and demand Israeli action to facilitate aid entry into the coastal enclave, while still holding Hamas accountable for its part in causing a hunger and starvation crisis in the first place.
Bývalý rukojmí Omer Šem Tov popisuje, co mu členové Hamásu říkali o svých skutečných záměrech:
„O území se přede mnou nikdy nezmínili. Vždycky opakovali, že jde o náboženství. A že jejich cíl je jasný – až zabijí Židy v Izraeli, vydají se do celého světa, aby zabíjeli Židy a křesťany.“
Tohle není nijak překvapivé. Hamás není národně-osvobozenecké hnutí bojující proti okupaci. Nejde mu o Palestince – ty zneužívá k získávání humanitární pomoci, k propagandě, jako lidské štíty i jako nástroj války.
Hamás je džihádistická organizace. Jeho cílem je vraždit Židy a zničit Izrael. Říkají to zcela otevřeně. A je to přímo napsané v jejich chartě.
Přesto si někteří západní aktivisté myslí, že Hamásu rozumějí lépe než on sám sobě.
-------------
Former hostage Omer Shem Tov describes what Hamas members told him about their true intentions:
“They never mentioned territory to me. They always repeated that it’s about religion. And that their goal is clear — once they kill the Jews in Israel, they will go around the world to kill Jews and Christians.”
None of this is surprising. Hamas is not a national liberation movement fighting against occupation. It does not care about Palestinians — it exploits them to obtain humanitarian aid, for propaganda, as human shields, and as tools of war.
Hamas is a jihadist organization. Its goal is to murder Jews and destroy Israel. They say it openly. It is written directly in their charter.
And yet some Western activists still believe they understand Hamas better than Hamas does.
👇
Sudanese people don’t have influencers making viral campaigns.
Sudanese people don’t have campus protests chanting their names.
Sudanese people don’t have celebrities posting black-and-white selfies pretending to care.
Sudanese people don’t have millions marching in Western capitals demanding justice.
Sudanese people don’t have trending hashtags screaming “genocide” on their behalf.
Sudanese people don’t have international commissions obsessively investigating every bullet.
Sudanese people don’t have NGOs publishing hourly reports about their suffering.
Sudanese people don’t have journalists flying in to document the mass rapes, slavery, and burning villages.
Sudanese people don’t have angry TikTok activists crying into their iPhones.
Sudanese people don’t have student unions shutting down universities in solidarity with them.
Sudanese people don’t have boycotts, sanctions, or global outrage as entire towns are wiped out.
Sudanese people don’t have moral lectures from the world’s “human-rights defenders.”
Sudanese people don’t have Western politicians pretending to be heartbroken for votes.
Sudanese people don’t have anyone threatening to “shut the world down” until the killings stop.
Sudanese people don’t have global movements screaming for their freedom while mass graves fill up.
Sudanese people don’t have any of that.
They only have a real genocide, real massacres, and a world that simply doesn’t care.