其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血

西方選民的貧困，在於他们支持抽自己血的福利制度。停止福利制度，他们就会摆脱贫困。福利所依赖是的赤字和税，就是选民自己的血。抽取到选民的血后，食税阶级喝掉大部分血，赏给选民喝小部分的血，就是福利。但选民认为喝到血里面别人的血更多，就开心的被食税阶级抽血，选民被抽血抽的赢弱不禁，却开心的认为喝到了別人的血，傻逼呵呵的选民。

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

选民的傻逼之处在于，大多数选民是懒惰成性的傻逼，只喜欢骗子的诺言：你可以不劳而获，你可以不劳而获，我们团结一致，一起搜刮别人的财富。

[Handre @Handre]

Socialism is impossible. Read that again.

Here is why:

1. Ludwig von Mises and the Calculation Problem; then 2. Friedrich Hayek and the Knowledge Problem.

They are distinct, and it's important to understand the difference.

Mises fired first. In his 1920 paper "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth," he drove a stake through the heart of central planning by showing that rational economic calculation is impossible without private ownership of the means of production. Prices are not arbitrary numbers. They are signals generated by actual bids and offers between property owners who face real profit and loss. Strip away private property, and you strip away the bidding process. Strip away the bidding process, and prices become bureaucratic guesses. A Soviet planner deciding how much steel to allocate between rail construction and tractor manufacturing has no genuine price for steel because no one is buying or selling it freely. He is flying blind. The problem is structural, not administrative. Hire smarter planners, give them faster computers; it changes nothing. The information cannot exist without the market process that generates it.

Communists read this and realized Mises was right. They found a roundabout way to keep going. They would simply use prices from Western capitalist countries.

Then Hayek hit them with his 1945 essay "The Use of Knowledge in Society." His target was subtly different. Hayek accepted that prices aggregate information. His contribution was to identify what kind of information markets process: local, dispersed, tacit knowledge that no central authority can collect. A warehouse manager in Düsseldorf knows that his particular supplier is three weeks behind schedule. A farmer in Kansas knows the soil conditions on his specific plot after last month's frost. A textile merchant in Lyon knows which dyes his buyers currently prefer. None of this knowledge is written down anywhere. Much of it the people holding it cannot fully articulate. It lives in habits, relationships, and on-the-ground experience accumulated over years. No survey, no commissar's report, no algorithm extracts it reliably. You cannot copy it from one country to another.

Mises showed that central planners lack the mechanism to generate rational prices. Hayek showed that even if planners somehow had prices, they still could not possess the ground-level knowledge those prices encode. Mises's problem kills socialist calculation at the structural level. Hayek's problem kills it at the epistemological level. The two arguments are complementary, stacked on top of each other like floors of a building.

The Soviet Union ran this entire experiment in full. Central planners in Moscow set over 20 million prices by the late Soviet period. Shortages and surpluses coexisted everywhere. Bread rotted in one city while another city's bread lines stretched around the block. Planners were not uniquely corrupt or stupid. They were operating inside an institutional structure that made rational allocation geometrically impossible, exactly as Mises predicted in 1920 and exactly as Hayek's epistemology explained in 1945.

Every government price control, every production quota, every centralized allocation scheme you live under today repeats this mistake at a smaller scale. The mechanism fails whether the commodity is steel, housing, or healthcare. The scale changes; the logic does not.

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

@Handre 占人口50%的人，能力弱的，唯一特点，就是不愿意听对他们不利的，而真理对他们不利。你越讲，真理。他们就恨不得你去死。世界的癌症，不是骗子，而是占人口50%的低能人。

[Estado Mínimo @xestadominimo]

“El socialismo es la ilusión de que alguien puede administrar mejor tu vida que tú mismo.”

- Antonio Escohotado -

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

@xestadominimo @A_K_A_Piexl 占人口50%的选民，恰恰难以管好自己，并嫉妒别人。所以。他们是社会主义的死忠粉。

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

@SirHijoDPuta @miguelcgangel 你这逻辑不清楚。左派政客、政党、媒体，就是民主党、就是建制派、就是社会主义、伊斯兰主义。他们是利益一致的同盟者。他们不会自己人反自己人的。

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

其实，不是商人的选民。都是傻逼。商人给你们丫的提供就业、提供工资。你们却仇恨商人。对通过赤字和加税，搜刮商人和你们自己的食税阶级，却他妈逼感激涕零的，认为商人缴税多，解气。傻逼的选民

[Olgierd Olo Jedlina @KingSajz2022]

To nie może być prawdą, na pewno tak nie jest! Prawda? 😉

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

@KingSajz2022 只要国家有赤字，则整个食税阶级，都是盗窃犯。除非财政赤字清零！米莱是对的，必需清零财政赤字，无论选民认为应该怎么花税是对的，怎么花税是错的。选民傻逼呵呵，总是要管税怎么花，而不管赤字！傻逼的选民。世界的癌症，就是多数选民的傻逼呵呵。

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

@KateriSeraphina 赞美你。由于愚蠢的选民占比，超过50%。所以，我已经绝望了。

[Kateri Seraphina @KateriSeraphina]

Lorsqu'on a demandé à Tchekhov quelle était la nature des sociétés défaillantes, il a répondu :
"Dans les sociétés défaillantes, il y a mille sots pour chaque esprit éclairé, et mille paroles grossières pour chaque mot conscient. La majorité reste toujours ignorante, et l'homme raisonnable est constamment vaincu. Si vous voyez des sujets futiles dominer les discussions dans une société, et les sots occuper le devant de la scène, alors vous êtes en présence d'une société très défaillante.
Par exemple, les chansons et les paroles vides de sens trouvent des millions de gens pour danser et les répéter, et le chanteur devient célèbre, connu et aimé. Au point que les gens prennent son avis sur les questions de la société et de la vie.
Quant aux écrivains et aux auteurs, personne ne les connaît et personne ne leur accorde de valeur ou de poids. La plupart des gens aiment la futilité et l'anesthésie. Quelqu'un qui nous anesthésie pour nous éloigner de nos pensées, et quelqu'un qui nous fait rire avec des futilités, est meilleur que quelqu'un qui nous réveille à la réalité et nous fait mal en disant la vérité. C'est pourquoi la démocratie ne convient pas aux sociétés ignorantes, car c'est la majorité ignorante qui décidera de votre destin." Le monde littéraire.

[James Quan @JamesQUAN10]

重磅！10月6日，德国联邦情报局局长汉宁因为被中国情报机构收买而被捕！

https://t.co/pu6jm6bzel

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

@ChinaTruth 老大，请你你抨击我们澳洲的食税阶级，扩大赤字赤字、增加税负吧。图形文字区人类跟你我没关系的。

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

@brivael 你这个弱智，用公共资金这个词！明明是税款！你他妈逼的别瞎逼。学学米莱，首先不允许赤字，赤字出现，立即停薪，造成赤字，就是盗窃。你傻逼，就跟你丫的能用好税款似的！傻逼。记住，不能赤字，不能你认为该如何永税就如何用税，你个傻逼。

[BroBro🇦🇺🏇🏻 @realRick_AUS]

Pauline Hanson has spent 30 years in the shithouse,

She’s been relentlessly attacked and she’s been jailed

Now,

She’s leading the political debate in Australia and every major political party is absolutely terrified of losing their jobs to her

🤌

[Restore Australia @JohnOBrien101]

Could I ask everyone to stop worrying about how Gina spends her money and worry more about how the Government spends yours?
Thanks

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

@EconomiaMises @hirot1954 @JMilei 可是，50%的选民，本身就是傻和坏！所以，绝望！

[其实造成选民贫困的原因是选民自己。他们选择的扩大福利，就持续扩大了赤字增加税负，透支啦自己的血 @NextTheoNote]

@senatorbabet 对！消减一半的食税阶级岗位。他们取税尽锱铢，花税入泥沙！可选民大多数是喜欢福利的傻逼逼。我很绝望。

[Q The Storm Rider @Q_TheStormRider]

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump takes huge VICTORY LAP after the climate change "experts" at the United Nations announce they were WRONG

"GOOD RIDDANCE! After 15 years of Dumocrats promising that “Climate Change” is going to destroy the Planet, the United Nations TOP Climate Committee just admitted that its own projections (RCP8.5) were WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!"

"For far too long Climate Activism has been used by Dumocrats to scare Americans, push horrible Energy Polices, and fund BILLIONS into their bogus research programs."

"Unlike the Dumocrats, who use Climate Alarmism nonsense to push their GREEN NEW SCAM, my Administration will always be based on TRUTH, SCIENCE, and FACT! President DONALD J. TRUMP"

This was one huge FRAUD.

Never fund the green scams again! 🔥

[Diego Angulo @AmoaHamlet]

Entendamos de una vez esto:

Milei no está donde está para calmar los miedos de la gente con mentiras que consuelen.

Está para decirte la verdad.

Aunque duela. Aunque sea cruda. Aunque destruya todas esas fantasías que llevan años diciéndote para no enfrentar la realidad.

Milei no te promete que salir del desastre será fácil. Te dice exactamente lo que pasará: si se ha destruido durante décadas los incentivos, las instituciones y las cuentas públicas, reconstruirlo va a costar.

Ahí está una de las grandes diferencias con el peronismo parasitario.

El peronista te vende el paraíso.

Te promete igualdad, abundancia y justicia sin explicarte en ningún momento cómo llegar ahí.

Milei, desde el primer día, te dijo que no existe una solución mágica para décadas de malas políticas.

Te dijo que tendrás que atravesar el doloroso proceso de corregir los errores.

Porque una cosa es aliviar un síntoma (como hacen los zurdos) y otra muy distinta es curar la enfermedad (como está haciendo Milei).

Habrá que trabajar, ahorrar, invertir, producir y esperar.

Eso no es crueldad. Es respeto hacia ti, porque no te está tomando el pelo, te dice la verdad.

Crueldad es mentirle a una sociedad durante años para comprar su aplauso mientras el problema se hace cada vez más grande.

La política infantil de los zurdos promete: “No tendrás que sacrificar nada”.

La política responsable de Milei te dice: “Esto es lo que ocurre, esta es la solución y este es el precio de esa solución”.

La decisión está en tus manos.

FIN.

[西蒙•冯•弗雷德里希•胥库兹Simon Von Friedrich Xurcuz @Zealots2022]

卡尔·马克思的整个福音可以归结为一句简短的话： “恨那些比你过得更好的人”

亨利·黑兹利特