@MMTLabour Oh my days you really are submarine door aren't you. It's an equivalence you moron. North Korea supplies Russia Britain supplies Ukraine. Special limited 3 day military operation da comrade.
Someone very similar to you gave up Anne Frank. Weak subservient traitor
@LynnBraben Shocked how many people have no idea of the origins of the Palestinian/Israeli war. Not surprising really when msm promotes the lie it was Israel what done it!. See how fucking stupid you sound when you swap Palestine for Ukraine and Israel for Russia
@MMTLabour Tell us the last time a North Korean was killed on North Korean soil by a Ukrainian rocket.
Then you can tell us the last time a russian died on russian soil by British novichock or British polonium.
Again, absolute ๐คก
@DrNostromo And what was Ukraine a part of during that war? Second only to Russia in numbers and a casualty rate on par per capita. Not quite sure what you're trying to get at
@meljomur And why did he impose martial law?
Perhaps if he hadn't you could have 'free Ukraine on your header as well. Or would that be different to Palestine?
@0Calamity Because appeasement worked ever so well in the 1930's. Wonder why you call it the Ukraine war with no mention of the country that invaded it
Hypocrite Dubai Barbie Isabel Oakeshott moved to the Middle East 2 years ago & still doesnโt speak the language. Yet her & Richard Tice throw a bitch attack at people coming to the UK who donโt speak English ๐คทโโ๏ธ
@DollyArmy2000@rustypar5 Nope,we associate the word to the only regime to ever launch a chemical weapons attack on ๐ฌ๐ง soil killing ๐ฌ๐ง citizens you silly sausage ๐
@Rickgaffer@orlaminihane Funny how you think we should send in the army over rubber dinghy s crossing our border but not if you're Ukrainian and tanks are crossing their border.
Far right fringe talking exactly the same as the far left fringe. Wonder how that came about.
The problem with discourse now is that an individual who has a strong opinion about a particular subject is treated as having equal value in a discussion with somebody who has factual knowledge of that subject.
Take the discussion between. A former head of The world trade organisation and a Brexit supporting Tory MP as an example: the bloke who knew everything there is to know about the WTO explained calmly and logically why Britain would find it very difficult to trade on WTO rules alone, with evidence of how the organisation actually works, and Tory just said, well I don't agree, we need to be more optimistic. Because apparently feelings are just as valid as actual facts.
That debate was years ago, but the desire to give Creedence to views that are based on complete another nonsense is indeed deeply damaging.
And of course, I'm not claiming to be an expert on everything, and there are many things I simply don't have an opinion on because I don't know enough.
We need to make knowledge cool again.
@narindertweets@bestcanton7 The last few days have been a real eye opener as to who some people really are.
If you bothered to look before assuming ๐ had your back just 5days ago and also frequently talking about racism, what happens when you profile someone as "them", you know, the others.