@JCDoubleTaxed@ExpatriationLaw@DoubleTaxation@USCitizenAbroad@CitizenshipTax Presumably the 1yr carry back / 10yr carry forward would cause it to match up to your eventual capital gains when you sell.
There’s no realistic way to avoid significant selling to cover taxes, which some of the critics claim to be an ECHR violation.
@ExpatriationLaw@DoubleTaxation@USCitizenAbroad@CitizenshipTax Box 3 (investments & savings) is taxed to hell under the new rules.
Personal Box 2 (dividends/distributions from a company you own more than 5% of) & corporate taxes remain favorable.
The people passing this tax know them & their donors don’t need to pay it.
@ParvizMalakouti They can’t fathom a world in which their jurisdiction has limits.
It’s like the (laughable) Dutch register of unwanted nationalities, intended as an alternative to renunciation for nationalities that don’t permit that.
@IRS_MEDIC@palladium12345@TaxFairUSAbroad@SolomonYue@SenRandPaul@RandPaul@RepLaHood Hate the game, not the players.
We’re all entitled to think scoring is stupid & the root of many problems in America, but it’s the rule that legislation dies by.
I’d rather play stupid games & give this a chance of passage than die on the wrong hill.
@IRS_MEDIC@palladium12345@TaxFairUSAbroad@SolomonYue@SenRandPaul “You catch more flies with honey” holds true here.
We need leads on both the House & Senate sides in order for this bill to move, so @RandPaul alongside @RepLaHood is far better than “in place of”.
There are also legitimate reasons why the bill hasn’t been reintroduced yet.
@ExpatriationLaw@ACAVoice It’s refreshing to be getting a terse summary of the bill/statutory text that’s identifying why overseas Americans are likely *not* directly in scope.
Always a risk that the implementing regs are flawed, but that’s a bridge to cross when the time comes.
@adrianpandev @ExoloringPhil Guy in the photo—the LaHood RBT bill was one of the major topics of conversation this week.
Ending CBT is very much the North Star.
@AttyStevenBrown@ParvizMalakouti We worked with Luigi Paiano a few years back for ours. Giovanni di Ruggiero has been posting pretty publicly about some of the angles for challenge, so he might also be worth looking into.
@AttyStevenBrown@ParvizMalakouti If you’re willing to roll the dice on (comparatively low) legal fees a bit, the immigration lawyers & opposition parties think this is going to be extremely vulnerable to legal challenges.
Could very well be the same as the oft-discussed “1948 cases”.
@ParvizMalakouti@AnnaBower Yeah, the expedited discovery order had a bunch of named depositions & two “of choice”.
Presumably for those, they’d want to go up the food chain instead of shaking down an intern